Esquidaz
12-03-2004, 04:48
The misunderstood wedge formation
There were three major victory (or defeat, if you were on the other side) in history.
The first one is well known, the Hannibal encirclement of Roman army at Cannae. This battle is why we talked so much about flanks in this forum.
The second one is the Battle of Agincourt between Henry V and Charles VI, where the powerfull French knight was defeated by the "correct" type of weapon, longbows. This forum also talked much about this rock-paper-scissor theory.
The third one, that established Napoleon as a military genius, was the Battle of Austerlitz, which I will talk a little longer.
The wedge formation is seldom mentioned in this forum, and when it was, usually with negative tone, ".. want to kill your bad general? Give his unit wedge formation and charge right into the enemy ...". There, you have the wedge formation usefulness yet a wrongly applied one ~;)
But refer to the Battle of Austerlitz, and you will see how it could be a usefull weapon in some battle situations.
Napoleon marched into the battle with an army that both lesser in quality and quantity, yet he emerged victorious. He could not beat his opponent as Hannibal. By then, every general in Europe already aware the peril of encirclement, so there were no way they (Prussian and Austrian) will fall to the same trap. And he cannot use Henry V advantage, too. Their weapon type and doctrine were just about the same.
So Napoleon devised a plan that would draw one part of unexpecting Austro-Prussian army to one side, and when he saw a gap in between, just a few hundred meters, he sent his center to wedge it, and broke them into two.
The advantage of doing this is there were four Austro-Prussian flanks against French three. That enabled the French army to move more freely to encircle and crush one part of their opponent, then moved the winning part to sweep the other part.
And that is how wedge formation should be applied (and I think that is what the designer had in their mind when offering this formation). To charge BETWEEN enemy units, not right into it. The delicate part is to decide which kind of unit to be used as the wedge.
There were three major victory (or defeat, if you were on the other side) in history.
The first one is well known, the Hannibal encirclement of Roman army at Cannae. This battle is why we talked so much about flanks in this forum.
The second one is the Battle of Agincourt between Henry V and Charles VI, where the powerfull French knight was defeated by the "correct" type of weapon, longbows. This forum also talked much about this rock-paper-scissor theory.
The third one, that established Napoleon as a military genius, was the Battle of Austerlitz, which I will talk a little longer.
The wedge formation is seldom mentioned in this forum, and when it was, usually with negative tone, ".. want to kill your bad general? Give his unit wedge formation and charge right into the enemy ...". There, you have the wedge formation usefulness yet a wrongly applied one ~;)
But refer to the Battle of Austerlitz, and you will see how it could be a usefull weapon in some battle situations.
Napoleon marched into the battle with an army that both lesser in quality and quantity, yet he emerged victorious. He could not beat his opponent as Hannibal. By then, every general in Europe already aware the peril of encirclement, so there were no way they (Prussian and Austrian) will fall to the same trap. And he cannot use Henry V advantage, too. Their weapon type and doctrine were just about the same.
So Napoleon devised a plan that would draw one part of unexpecting Austro-Prussian army to one side, and when he saw a gap in between, just a few hundred meters, he sent his center to wedge it, and broke them into two.
The advantage of doing this is there were four Austro-Prussian flanks against French three. That enabled the French army to move more freely to encircle and crush one part of their opponent, then moved the winning part to sweep the other part.
And that is how wedge formation should be applied (and I think that is what the designer had in their mind when offering this formation). To charge BETWEEN enemy units, not right into it. The delicate part is to decide which kind of unit to be used as the wedge.