Soulforged
08-19-2005, 07:01
Here is the http://www.nuevamayoria.com/ES/INVESTIGACIONES/defensa/050809.html for those of you who read spanish.
Text by Ignacio J. Osacar (Coordinator of the Comission of Defense of the CENM)
Any way i will translate some parts of importance:
"Some effectives have imformed of the presence of 400 northamerican privates en Paraguay and in someway it sugest that is an advance to the instalation of a base with geopolitical signification in South America. This would be the result of bilateral agreements signed in the current year with the finallity of making excersice (i don't know if this is translated correctly, in the text it's "ejercitaciones" it refers to economics excersices) and bilateral exchange. It's sayed that the base would be located in Mariscal Estigarribia..."
"For it proximity it may be an attempt from the United States to take control of the natural resources of the zone, like oil and bolivian gas, the water source on Guaranie's land and the trafic on the Triple Frontier (Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina). Knowing the recent political and social situation on Bolivia, the scarce fronteir control of the surrounding countries, the endemic smugling of all kind of mercancies -also narcotics- with the complicity or pasivity of the neighboring nations and with an scenario of poberty and maginality; it allows to see that in a middle term this activities will increase and for instance they will influence the regional estability. If we include in this scene the presence, permanent, transitory or temporary, of terrorists, it is expected that some anticipated measure was taken with the objective of ensuring a controllable future."
"In 2003, the Commander of the NATO, General James said:"...there exists great zones not ruled, that are potential santuaries for the terrorists of the world and for the future traders of all types of elements, wich we try to fight...". This reflextion is not only circunscribed to the european or Islamic terrorism nor to the narcotraficants, it appears to be more ample. He added: "...we've an oportunity to set an strategic presence, if necessary an operational presence, faster than before. For instance, is reasonably expected that we analize the settlements of any bases to ensure that we will do things right in the future...". The General continues:"...anything we do, any proposes we've made, is to do things more agile for the forces that with have...", then he clearify "...the direction of any type of adjustment in our forces is to dispose of a greater strategic effect...".
This will indicate the general politics for all northamerican forces available in USA territory and in the rest of the world.
"The United States have Uniffied Commands, wich depends directly of the president, with jurisdictional responsability world wide, and even in outer space."
"This are the Central Command, to manage all hostile operations in the rest of the world (actually their forces operate in Irak and Afganistan); the European Command, wich extention is given by the name and relates to the NATO; the Pacific Command, wich includes all the ocean, the isles and the Far East; the South Command, with responsability from Bravo River to the Antartida included the Caribe; the Command of Special Forces, with global jurisdiction; the Command of Administration of Military Traffic, wich manages all the mediums of transportations, aerial, naval and ground of the Defense; the Space Command, with jurisdiction on all outer space, including the medium of strategic defense and, finally, the North Command, with the mission of strategic defense of USA. It's very clear that the northamerican strategical plan does not leaves any spot uncovered, foresighting the employment of all the mediums in all moments and depending on the turn of events that affect their interests and those of their allies."
"The topic of the military bases of USA is old and goes back to begginings of the XX centurym when USA inspered by it's "manifested destiny" decided to take control all over the places considered by them as vitals for their interests. This strategical actitud is the continuation of one employed by Britain, for many centuries, with the occupation of the interoceanic paths to ensure it's commerce."
-He makes a series of clearifications and mentions and then he says this: "There's no much information about what are the factors of negotiation for each case with the objective to get consent of the countries in question (some near Irak), we apreciate that it goes from voluntary and enthusiastic cooperation, to a more militaric opression in other cases."
"Tough there's no information conffirmed in actuality, because of the viculations and history beetween this countries, wich form the Organization of Caribbean States of the East...they could provide irrestrict coopetation to USA for operations from their territories and in fact they materialize an arrow aiming geograficaly to Venezuela.".
"In the case of Australia, traditionaly they have cooperated with fullness with the USA forces, giving unlimited access to their instalations and the execution of unilateral and bilateral armies."
"Respect of the troops in Paraguay, the nothamerican military sources consulted deny that's a permanent force, but it's the result of bilateral agreements for exercises and exchange and that this troops will not extend their activities beyond a limited time."
"Tough the authorities in Paraguay granted the soldiers in it's territory an juridic immunity without precedents, thing that never happened in any other country. They'll have the same condition given to diplomatics administratives functionaries. We've to clearify that the agreement ends in December of 2006 and is of prorrogable caracter."
-He then follows with some more assumptions and deductions.
Well i've posted this so everybody who wants is informed of the recent movements of USA in all the world, but specially here. Also i've mentioned sometimes the case of the petition of USA to make something similar here, so here it's a current example.
I don't like to make predictions in this, but one thing is certain USA haves power in all the world, an it appears that their new way to make diplomacy is throught employments of military bases. Personally i think that it's too much power of response to one single country, but make your own guesses.
Text by Ignacio J. Osacar (Coordinator of the Comission of Defense of the CENM)
Any way i will translate some parts of importance:
"Some effectives have imformed of the presence of 400 northamerican privates en Paraguay and in someway it sugest that is an advance to the instalation of a base with geopolitical signification in South America. This would be the result of bilateral agreements signed in the current year with the finallity of making excersice (i don't know if this is translated correctly, in the text it's "ejercitaciones" it refers to economics excersices) and bilateral exchange. It's sayed that the base would be located in Mariscal Estigarribia..."
"For it proximity it may be an attempt from the United States to take control of the natural resources of the zone, like oil and bolivian gas, the water source on Guaranie's land and the trafic on the Triple Frontier (Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina). Knowing the recent political and social situation on Bolivia, the scarce fronteir control of the surrounding countries, the endemic smugling of all kind of mercancies -also narcotics- with the complicity or pasivity of the neighboring nations and with an scenario of poberty and maginality; it allows to see that in a middle term this activities will increase and for instance they will influence the regional estability. If we include in this scene the presence, permanent, transitory or temporary, of terrorists, it is expected that some anticipated measure was taken with the objective of ensuring a controllable future."
"In 2003, the Commander of the NATO, General James said:"...there exists great zones not ruled, that are potential santuaries for the terrorists of the world and for the future traders of all types of elements, wich we try to fight...". This reflextion is not only circunscribed to the european or Islamic terrorism nor to the narcotraficants, it appears to be more ample. He added: "...we've an oportunity to set an strategic presence, if necessary an operational presence, faster than before. For instance, is reasonably expected that we analize the settlements of any bases to ensure that we will do things right in the future...". The General continues:"...anything we do, any proposes we've made, is to do things more agile for the forces that with have...", then he clearify "...the direction of any type of adjustment in our forces is to dispose of a greater strategic effect...".
This will indicate the general politics for all northamerican forces available in USA territory and in the rest of the world.
"The United States have Uniffied Commands, wich depends directly of the president, with jurisdictional responsability world wide, and even in outer space."
"This are the Central Command, to manage all hostile operations in the rest of the world (actually their forces operate in Irak and Afganistan); the European Command, wich extention is given by the name and relates to the NATO; the Pacific Command, wich includes all the ocean, the isles and the Far East; the South Command, with responsability from Bravo River to the Antartida included the Caribe; the Command of Special Forces, with global jurisdiction; the Command of Administration of Military Traffic, wich manages all the mediums of transportations, aerial, naval and ground of the Defense; the Space Command, with jurisdiction on all outer space, including the medium of strategic defense and, finally, the North Command, with the mission of strategic defense of USA. It's very clear that the northamerican strategical plan does not leaves any spot uncovered, foresighting the employment of all the mediums in all moments and depending on the turn of events that affect their interests and those of their allies."
"The topic of the military bases of USA is old and goes back to begginings of the XX centurym when USA inspered by it's "manifested destiny" decided to take control all over the places considered by them as vitals for their interests. This strategical actitud is the continuation of one employed by Britain, for many centuries, with the occupation of the interoceanic paths to ensure it's commerce."
-He makes a series of clearifications and mentions and then he says this: "There's no much information about what are the factors of negotiation for each case with the objective to get consent of the countries in question (some near Irak), we apreciate that it goes from voluntary and enthusiastic cooperation, to a more militaric opression in other cases."
"Tough there's no information conffirmed in actuality, because of the viculations and history beetween this countries, wich form the Organization of Caribbean States of the East...they could provide irrestrict coopetation to USA for operations from their territories and in fact they materialize an arrow aiming geograficaly to Venezuela.".
"In the case of Australia, traditionaly they have cooperated with fullness with the USA forces, giving unlimited access to their instalations and the execution of unilateral and bilateral armies."
"Respect of the troops in Paraguay, the nothamerican military sources consulted deny that's a permanent force, but it's the result of bilateral agreements for exercises and exchange and that this troops will not extend their activities beyond a limited time."
"Tough the authorities in Paraguay granted the soldiers in it's territory an juridic immunity without precedents, thing that never happened in any other country. They'll have the same condition given to diplomatics administratives functionaries. We've to clearify that the agreement ends in December of 2006 and is of prorrogable caracter."
-He then follows with some more assumptions and deductions.
Well i've posted this so everybody who wants is informed of the recent movements of USA in all the world, but specially here. Also i've mentioned sometimes the case of the petition of USA to make something similar here, so here it's a current example.
I don't like to make predictions in this, but one thing is certain USA haves power in all the world, an it appears that their new way to make diplomacy is throught employments of military bases. Personally i think that it's too much power of response to one single country, but make your own guesses.