PDA

View Full Version : who was better Justiantian or Charlagmane?


Strike For The South
10-18-2005, 23:10
post who and why I need :help:
Alexanderofmacedon
10-18-2005, 23:14
Your homework? Sad...~;)
lars573
10-19-2005, 03:13
Charlemagne. Why cause his name can be made fun of so greatly. Chuckles the best Charlie the spiffy, it goes on and on.
Gregoshi
10-19-2005, 03:51
Will you give us a gold star too if you get one on your homework? It must be history class homework night.:book:
Mouzafphaerre
10-19-2005, 04:14
.
They're incomparable. They lived in different times, different places and under different conditions. Furthermore, "better" is not a criterium to compare them. Better in what? for what?

Tell this to your teacher and you'll regret it.
~D
.
Strike For The South
10-19-2005, 04:41
Will you give us a gold star too if you get one on your homework? It must be history class homework night.:book:

Ap world history~:cheers: @M My teaacher is a feminest so if you have a :balloon2: you cant say anything meaningful. (Although my intelligence is way higher than hers as evidenced by this stupid assiginment)
Franconicus
10-19-2005, 06:59
Crazy topic! The question is: What is good in this context? I agree that you cannot compare them. But if you have to do it, list the pros and cons (Charlemagne: created a big empire, spread Christianity, defeated the Moslems, protected the church - depopulated most of Europe, occupied the countries of the neighbors ...). Then in a summary just say that one cannot compare them, that both were big charismatic leaders in their times ...
You should get through with that.