View Full Version : you crazy canadians an ya sex parties
Strike For The South
12-27-2005, 01:35
http://www.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/americas/12/26/canada.swingers.reut/index.html
Do the really hafto legalise this? Is this illegal in the USA? Why would some consider wrong? Joey, have you ever been to a Turkish prison?
LeftEyeNine
12-27-2005, 01:56
Liberalism kills me.. WTF is this ?!
Nothing happens if children watch them doing it, don't you think ? Let'em do it once a week in kindergarten -in a safe way, of course. :san_sarcasm:
I'll be watching for Canadians' democratic progress -they'll fly for sure. :san_shocked:
P.S. Nice start, you ugly SFTS.. :san_kiss:
Sex don't scare us.
That's why we're so incredibly good at it. :san_cool: :san_kiss:
LeftEyeNine
12-27-2005, 07:04
Sex don't scare us.
That's why we're so incredibly good at it. :san_cool: :san_kiss:
Tell me you never heard of Turkish fame for it. :san_cool:
Why was it illegal in the first place? It's consensual, so who give a damn what others do behind closed doors? It's not like they film it and show it to Mrs. Plainfield's 3rd grade class
LeftEyeNine
12-27-2005, 07:50
Such allowances have cancerous effect, me thinks..
Anyone may give a damn about what is going on behind those closed doors, human is not perfect and best-decisive about what to be done. I believe in the rightfulness of some ethically restrictive rules. I'm not talking about the extremist and inhumane examples like stoning of women in some countries due to their sexual activities, should I tell you.
"Free it all" will not work, while contradictively damaging the social welfare of the community in the long term. Let's say I predict it to be so.. That is "corruption" in brief words.
What is so bad about this? If it is all in agreement, go ahead :san_kiss:
Such allowances have cancerous effect, me thinks..
Anyone may give a damn about what is going on behind those closed doors, human is not perfect and best-decisive about what to be done. I believe in the rightfulness of some ethically restrictive rules. I'm not talking about the extremist and inhumane examples like stoning of women in some countries due to their sexual activities, should I tell you.
"Free it all" will not work, while contradictively damaging the social welfare of the community in the long term. Let's say I predict it to be so.. That is "corruption" in brief words.
No mate - let people get on with whatever they want. If you don't like it, just look the other way.
LeftEyeNine
12-27-2005, 14:19
That was my 2 cents, I'm not blaming anyone for anything. As I said - it was just a prediction.
I - and every sane person - see nothing wrong with the ruling. What people do behind closed doors, as long as it does not harm others, is nothing to do with me. Swing away!
Sjakihata
12-27-2005, 15:39
I dont understand groupsex was banned in the first place. Thats quite old-fashioned and conservative.
Thank God (literally thank him) groupsex is allowed in most (if not all) of europe.
I dont understand groupsex was banned in the first place. Thats quite old-fashioned and conservative.
Thank God (literally thank him) groupsex is allowed in most (if not all) of europe.
It was not illegal in a private home, but this was the second or thrid floor of a night club. Granted you couldn't just walk in, stip, and have a go at who ever took your eye. You had to join as a couple, and pay an annual fee. Hence the prostitution charge. In basic terms protitution is the solicitation of sex for money in public or a public place (like a night club). That's the work around that escort services have, you aren't buying sex on the street corner. In this case you have a private members only club that offers couple on couple action. Although if you look at the ages these people have all probably gone to seed. :rtwno:
Louis VI the Fat
12-28-2005, 02:02
The ruling sparked outrage, largely in English-speaking parts of Canada, where critics said it would erode limits on indecency or obscenity, encourage prostitution and even contribute to the corruption of minors.
In the mainly French-speaking and predominantly Catholic province of Quebec, however, the decision caused barely a ripple of adverse reaction. Newspaper editorialists fumed in Toronto but largely yawned in Montreal.I toast to the blessings of libertine French genes, strong enough to withstand centuries of exposure to hostile arctic storms, wild polar animals, dangerous natives and countless prudish anglosaxons. ~:cheers:
Spartakus
12-28-2005, 02:22
I toast to the blessings of libertine French genes, strong enough to withstand centuries of exposure to hostile arctic storms, wild polar animals, dangerous natives and countless prudish anglosaxons. ~:cheers:
Amen, liberté!
We should watch ourselves so that we do not become so arrogantly convinced of our own righteousness that we would seek to impose our moral codes on others. This urge to control people according to one's own set of ethics, down to the tiniest detail like who has consensual sex with who, is potentially fatal for all freedom.
Byzantine Prince
12-28-2005, 02:35
WOW this is sweet. Group sex clubs is by far the kewlest! :happyg:
I'm glad to be Canadian!
Alexanderofmacedon
12-28-2005, 05:02
SFTS, this happens in the US all the time...
It was on some talk show, where it said 10% or more of the United States population are swingers...
It's legal, it's wierd, and it's happening!:gring:
Kaiser of Arabia
12-28-2005, 07:37
Such allowances have cancerous effect, me thinks..
Anyone may give a damn about what is going on behind those closed doors, human is not perfect and best-decisive about what to be done. I believe in the rightfulness of some ethically restrictive rules. I'm not talking about the extremist and inhumane examples like stoning of women in some countries due to their sexual activities, should I tell you.
"Free it all" will not work, while contradictively damaging the social welfare of the community in the long term. Let's say I predict it to be so.. That is "corruption" in brief words.
YAY for LEN! :rtwyes:
KukriKhan
01-04-2006, 16:09
Not to be out-done by the Canuckians...Floridians, too, it seems.
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/03/D8ETBJN81.html
Some teenage soccer players and their parents saw more sights than they wanted when they stayed at a hotel where about 200 swingers were having a New Year's party.
Paul Camporini brought his wife, seventh-grade daughter and eighth- grade son from Safety Harbor and said he had to "delicately explain to my Catholic school children that swingers change partners during the evening."
"My biggest gripe is that the hotel had two distinctly different groups under the same roof," said Camporini, 49. "A soccer team and middle-aged swingers should not have been booked together."
Vladimir
01-04-2006, 16:55
When sex become something unhealthy like drug addiction? Both are used to experience a state of euphoria and both can be symptoms of psychological problems. Flashing minors, as one middle-aged woman did at that hotel, is clearly the symptom of a disorder. *lights fuse and runs away*
English assassin
01-04-2006, 18:40
There is an aesthetic angle to this though.
I mean, come on people, we are all believers in beauty here in the backroom. And, frankly, I can't imagine anything less beautiful than 200 "middle aged swingers" getting it on in a florida hotel. In a world containing 200 middle aged couples shagging in public any sort of visual outrage is possible. It starts like this, and the next thing someone has drawn a moustache and glasses on the Mona Lisa.
So I say that group sex should only be legal between good looking people. Of course we would need a regulator to confirm that legal levels of pulchritude were being maintained at all times. It would be a tough job but I would be willing to do it, for the good of society.
Kralizec
01-04-2006, 18:41
The families said the sexually adventurous partygoers sometimes flashed breasts and bare buttocks in front of the children as they sashayed through the hotel atrium. The parents described the dress at the Crowne Plaza Hotel-Airport in Orlando as "raunchy, despicable and worse than prostitutes."
.....
"The kids could see through the glass atrium into the ballroom where naked people were dancing. There were exposed breasts, thongs and see- through dresses on women who were not wearing any underwear."
:oops:
Vladimir
01-04-2006, 18:45
There is an aesthetic angle to this though.
So I say that group sex should only be legal between good looking people. Of course we would need a regulator to confirm that legal levels of pulchritude were being maintained at all times. It would be a tough job but I would be willing to do it, for the good of society.
What a selfless man. For queen and country!
I - and every sane person -
Oh how modest of you. If you are the definition of sane, JAG, I really don't want to see insane. :no:
The families said the sexually adventurous partygoers sometimes flashed breasts and bare buttocks in front of the children as they sashayed through the hotel atrium. The parents described the dress at the Crowne Plaza Hotel-Airport in Orlando as "raunchy, despicable and worse than prostitutes."
.....
"The kids could see through the glass atrium into the ballroom where naked people were dancing. There were exposed breasts, thongs and see- through dresses on women who were not wearing any underwear."
:oops:
That`s bad indeed, considering that most of them are long past the 40s.
:help:
Mithrandir
01-04-2006, 22:21
Why worry?
Not my sor of thing, but I hate things which are forbidden even though noone get's harmed...
Vladimir
01-04-2006, 22:28
Why worry?
Not my sor of thing, but I hate things which are forbidden even though noone get's harmed...
No one's harmed?!? If I saw my parents having sex at 11 I would be scarred for life. Imagine a room full of other people's parents having sex. Oh the horror :fainting: !
Byzantine Prince
01-04-2006, 22:58
That`s bad indeed, considering that most of them are long past the 40s.
:help:
Why so much discrimation? People past their 40's have holes too you know. :laugh4:
Goofball
01-05-2006, 00:08
Why so much discrimation? People past their 40's have holes too you know. :laugh4:
They also (well, at least 50% of them, anyway) have pokey-things...
:inquisitive:
Uesugi Kenshin
01-05-2006, 02:55
No one's harmed?!? If I saw my parents having sex at 11 I would be scarred for life. Imagine a room full of other people's parents having sex. Oh the horror :fainting: !
That's why it should be behind closed doors! That way they can do whatever they want, tell you they are going out to dinner and you can sit at home without a clue as to what is going on. Now if they were doing it in front of their kids....:no:
Watchman
01-05-2006, 03:20
:inquisitive: Huh. Not too long ago I read of something similar - in NY. Gotta love these free-distribution youth mags, you learn the oddest things from them. :book:
"The kids could see through the glass atrium into the ballroom where naked people were dancing. There were exposed breasts, thongs and see- through dresses on women who were not wearing any underwear."Would this be the infamous Anglo-Saxon nudity taboo ? Huh. Glad I'm living in sauna country where the human body doesn't give people hissy fits.
'Course, there's so many drunks peeing in street corners (or passed out with trousers at half-mast) every Friday night sanity would become a rather challenging prospect if it did... :inquisitive:
Excellent. All-you-can eat buffets at the strip clubs, and now this. I'm going to have to spend more time in Montreal.
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.