Androo
03-14-2006, 01:07
I was a bit surprised today to find that the Starforce thread in the Arena had departed this earth. A precise cause of death has yet to be determined. Strangely, the only mark on the body was a tiny wound at the base of the skull about the diameter of, oh, I don't know...say, an antique Japanese hairpin... A poem written in elegant characters and left at the scene, the ink still wet, suggested that the thread had been terminated because our most honourable frog :bow: :bow: :bow: came to the conclusion that it was
...not particularly productive. The complaints about Starforce have been said many times in the past, in many threads.
Closed.According to the google of the forums I did, Starforce has actually only been mentioned in about half a dozen posts previously. (That low number surprised me. Perhaps I wasn't searching correctly- could somebody double check that?) Anyway, I would respectfully submit that an open, dedicated Starforce thread would be of use, given that knowledge of the problems that Starforce may bring to users is still evolving. Perhaps a better setting for it would be the hardware / software forum.
However a more important question I believe is the .org policy of the closing of threads because a moderator deems them to be not particularly productive. While a given thread may well be boring or unproductive to many, including moderators, as long as it is of interest to some .org members and it does not break any of the .org rules, should it not be left open? What harm is done by doing so?
I don't ask those questions rhetorically. Perhaps there is an element of expense or bandwidth or something else which I'm not aware of and which makes the policy a neccessity. However, if there is not such a practical consideration, I would urge that the policy be amended.
:2cents:~:)
...not particularly productive. The complaints about Starforce have been said many times in the past, in many threads.
Closed.According to the google of the forums I did, Starforce has actually only been mentioned in about half a dozen posts previously. (That low number surprised me. Perhaps I wasn't searching correctly- could somebody double check that?) Anyway, I would respectfully submit that an open, dedicated Starforce thread would be of use, given that knowledge of the problems that Starforce may bring to users is still evolving. Perhaps a better setting for it would be the hardware / software forum.
However a more important question I believe is the .org policy of the closing of threads because a moderator deems them to be not particularly productive. While a given thread may well be boring or unproductive to many, including moderators, as long as it is of interest to some .org members and it does not break any of the .org rules, should it not be left open? What harm is done by doing so?
I don't ask those questions rhetorically. Perhaps there is an element of expense or bandwidth or something else which I'm not aware of and which makes the policy a neccessity. However, if there is not such a practical consideration, I would urge that the policy be amended.
:2cents:~:)