Divinus Arma
05-17-2006, 14:55
All right, let's get real on this Bush. The troops at the border is nothing more than smoke and mirrors to push through a "temporary worker" (amnesty) plan. This is nothing more than a political stunt and waste of resources to placate those stupid enough to be dazzled by big shows of force.
This is a temporary, and ineffectual, answer to the problem. And once the troops are gone, then what? Then we are left with a retarded amnesty plan.
I hope your approval goes down to 8%. Yes 8%.
I am so incredibley outraged by Bush and the Sentae jerk-offs who supported this. Here is the really screwed up thing: Senate couldn't even pass an amendment to ensure that the borders were secure first before they gave the invaders their amnesty!
I feel like an American unrepresented. I used to think the GOP stood for something, but what the hell? Huge government. Massive intrusion. Infringement on State's rights. And the importation of an uneducated impoverished victim class into our society.
This border troops thing is BS. If you are a conservative and you think this is a good idea, please tell me why so I can tear up your argument like tissue paper. Or maybe you can "enlighten" me on why sending 6000 troops, half of which are supervisors and half of the total force is support, meaning only 1/4 are going to be actively patrolling over three 8 hr shifts in a day = [(6000/2)/2]/3 = 500 "extra" forces over a several thousand mile border.
(Ser Clegane: edited for language)
This is a temporary, and ineffectual, answer to the problem. And once the troops are gone, then what? Then we are left with a retarded amnesty plan.
I hope your approval goes down to 8%. Yes 8%.
I am so incredibley outraged by Bush and the Sentae jerk-offs who supported this. Here is the really screwed up thing: Senate couldn't even pass an amendment to ensure that the borders were secure first before they gave the invaders their amnesty!
I feel like an American unrepresented. I used to think the GOP stood for something, but what the hell? Huge government. Massive intrusion. Infringement on State's rights. And the importation of an uneducated impoverished victim class into our society.
This border troops thing is BS. If you are a conservative and you think this is a good idea, please tell me why so I can tear up your argument like tissue paper. Or maybe you can "enlighten" me on why sending 6000 troops, half of which are supervisors and half of the total force is support, meaning only 1/4 are going to be actively patrolling over three 8 hr shifts in a day = [(6000/2)/2]/3 = 500 "extra" forces over a several thousand mile border.
(Ser Clegane: edited for language)