Watchman
02-19-2007, 01:04
...how exactly are they meant to be statted ? I'm only down to the Mada Asabara in the EDU, and there's already been three different patterns on the subject...
First is what the Komatai Hippeis and Ridonharjoz have:
stat_sec 4, 25, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, spear, 15 ,0.33
stat_sec_attr ap(This seems incidentally otherwise identical to what for example the Leuce Epos have for their underarm spears, save for the attack delay being under 1/10th...)
Then what the Aspet Hetselazor have:
stat_pri 6, 27, no, 0, 0, melee, blade, piercing, spear, 0 ,0.15
stat_pri_attr no
And then what the Katpatuka and Mada Asbaras sport:
stat_pri 7, 25, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, spear, 160 ,0.33
stat_pri_attr ap
There seems to be some consistency issues here. I gather, based on what has been said on the subject previously, that the pattern should be something along the lines of "base attack higher than underarms, charge bonus lower, much less attack delay, lower lethality and no AP" ?
First is what the Komatai Hippeis and Ridonharjoz have:
stat_sec 4, 25, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, spear, 15 ,0.33
stat_sec_attr ap(This seems incidentally otherwise identical to what for example the Leuce Epos have for their underarm spears, save for the attack delay being under 1/10th...)
Then what the Aspet Hetselazor have:
stat_pri 6, 27, no, 0, 0, melee, blade, piercing, spear, 0 ,0.15
stat_pri_attr no
And then what the Katpatuka and Mada Asbaras sport:
stat_pri 7, 25, no, 0, 0, melee, simple, piercing, spear, 160 ,0.33
stat_pri_attr ap
There seems to be some consistency issues here. I gather, based on what has been said on the subject previously, that the pattern should be something along the lines of "base attack higher than underarms, charge bonus lower, much less attack delay, lower lethality and no AP" ?