Log in

View Full Version : Nation question



UltraWar
02-24-2007, 23:06
Would you rather be the ruler of a small nation or a servant of a large nation?

Upxl
02-24-2007, 23:16
Nothing beats a good old-fashioned gah!

Csargo
02-24-2007, 23:16
You can turn a small nation into a large one. ;)

King Henry V
02-24-2007, 23:49
Ruler of a small one of course. Nothing like a good bit of Total War foreign policy to expand the nation, especially if you're in a region where there are many other small countries.

pevergreen
02-25-2007, 00:08
T'is good to be king.

Orb
02-25-2007, 01:23
Time to beat up the US with 3 units of Mexican Guerillas, two of whom don't have guns.

I love the AI.

Philippus Flavius Homovallumus
02-25-2007, 01:51
LOL.

How about ruler of a big nation?

Assassins are easy to spam.

I voted Gah, but in all honesty I'd rather be my own master than a puppet.

Justiciar
02-25-2007, 01:53
It depends on what you mean by servant. :inquisitive: And what kind of nation are we talking about here? I'd rather be a Oligarch of the late USSR than a faceless factory worker in Imperial Britain.

IrishArmenian
02-25-2007, 02:17
Really, this is a case-sensitive decision for me.
Like Justiciar, I could not be a factory worker in Imperial Britain, but I would not, like to be a higher up in the USSR for morality reasons.

Beirut
02-25-2007, 02:19
Just one of the whining Canadian proletariat is good enough for me. :canada:

Or King of Naked Babe Kinkyland. Either one.

spmetla
02-25-2007, 02:31
I see there's a lot more chiefs than indians here!

So long as it wasn't a small nation in Africa or Latin America, I'd be glad to rule it. There's a tendancy in those two regions to cycle through many leaders in relatively short periods.

Something like Luxembourg or Lichtenstein would be just perfect.

CountArach
02-25-2007, 02:34
Ruler of the small nation, but I would be scared that the power would start to go to my head.

Justiciar
02-25-2007, 02:38
I see there's a lot more chiefs than indians here!
I'm a right honourable gentleman, not a majesty. :yes:

Quintus Of Pompeii
02-25-2007, 02:45
Duh, if you are ruler you can do what you please. For example if ones brother is a little bit annoying you can put him in the stocks and throw poo at him...

ShadeHonestus
02-25-2007, 02:56
Duh, if you are ruler you can do what you please. For example if ones brother is a little bit annoying you can put him in the stocks and throw poo at him...


You don't have to be a ruler for that.

sapi
02-25-2007, 03:02
Australia's a small nation :yes:

Justiciar
02-25-2007, 03:53
Australia's a small nation :yes:
Compared to what? Russia? :dizzy2:

sapi
02-25-2007, 03:58
Most American states have more people than us :laugh4:

CountArach
02-25-2007, 04:01
Australia's a small nation :yes:

I must admit that it would be cool claiming to be the dictator of a whoel continent :grin:

sapi
02-25-2007, 04:04
One has to have ambitions, eh? :beam:

Marshal Murat
02-25-2007, 04:49
Caesar said it best.

Kanamori
02-25-2007, 06:06
Safe answer: Gah!

Warluster
02-25-2007, 06:12
Actually AUstralia is a massive nation, Australia is almost larger then the US!
It would take a few monthes to egt from the East Coast to the West Coast of Australia.


I would be the servant of Australia, and what type of servant would I be? Probaly the person who stands by Parliment door and during meetings, shovels all the crap away.

ShadeHonestus
02-25-2007, 08:30
What would the title be?

"Your Honorable Dingo"

Martok
02-25-2007, 08:39
Hmm. Gonna have to go with "GAH!" on this one, as I would really have to judge it on a case-by-case basis. ~D

Omanes Alexandrapolites
02-25-2007, 09:04
Certainly a ruler of a small nation.

Zalmoxis
02-25-2007, 09:06
Rather be a ruler, control is fun.

Duke Malcolm
02-25-2007, 12:48
There's a reason I resigned my Kingship and became DM instead of KM...

Lorenzo_H
02-25-2007, 15:15
It is better to be a lion for one day than a lamb for a thousand.

Somebody Else
02-25-2007, 15:41
'tis better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven.

Or was it the other way 'round.

Caius
02-25-2007, 15:43
GAH! Just to be sure from the Secret Service

Conradus
02-25-2007, 16:21
Actually AUstralia is a massive nation, Australia is almost larger then the US!
It would take a few monthes to egt from the East Coast to the West Coast of Australia.


Almost larger? the US is also almost larger then Russia

I'd rather be the leader of a small nation, something like Monaco or Luxembourg, then being a servant in a larger (exept offcourse if that would be a good position to overthrow the goverment?:yes: )

sapi
02-26-2007, 08:55
'tis better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven.And that's the quote i was looking for :yes:

Duke Malcolm
02-26-2007, 17:43
The quote was the other way round
...better to serve in heaven (actually, Earth, i think Achilles said) than be a king in hell...

King Henry V
02-26-2007, 18:51
Wasn't it Milton? I believe it was referring to Satan, in which case it would have been "'tis better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven".

Duke Malcolm
02-26-2007, 19:09
Perhaps, but isn't it also written in the Odyssey that Achilles says something quite contrary?

yesdachi
02-26-2007, 19:41
Without a doubt “ruler of a small nation”.

Oh, the laws I would pass!

Main import: Jell-O
Main export: videos of what we do in the Jell-O

:laugh4:

Hepcat
02-26-2007, 20:17
I'd rule a small country. Don't know which one I would want though.

Incongruous
02-26-2007, 22:12
I'd gladley serve in the mighty nation of Monty, ruled by the great Pythons.
Though if I was the uler of a small nation, it would have to be a nation of GOONS!

Caerfanan
02-27-2007, 11:03
I voted "servant in a large nation". That for the serious part: mankind's only hope is to finally consider all those speaking monkeys as a part of one nation, and this doesn't mean that one has to make the others behave like him.

And wishing oneself some sort of king or princess unfortunately doesn't help.

Now, this would probably reduce the inspiration for totalwar games, wouldn't it? :laugh4:

Conqueror
02-27-2007, 12:19
Ruler of a small nation. Unless those two nations happen to be at war :laugh4:

sapi
02-28-2007, 09:59
The quote was the other way round
...better to serve in heaven (actually, Earth, i think Achilles said) than be a king in hell...
It was Milton, and it's correct as quoted.

It doesn't make sense the other way around :laugh4:

:bow:

Samurai Waki
02-28-2007, 21:36
...well I'm tired of being a servant in hell. ~;)

edyzmedieval
03-03-2007, 21:11
Definitely ruler of a small nation. Look at Luxembourg. Big city, covered by huge walls. My type of kingdom from where to expand.

Snite
03-05-2007, 04:01
To quote Julius Ceasar: I would rather be the leader of a small gallic village, than be second man in Rome.

And in Paradise Lost, written by John Milton, the quote is from Satan's line: "'Tis better to reign in Hell than serve in Heaven." Which is actually a pretty powerful line because in Paradise Lost, Satan and his demons are just as tormented by Hell as any mortal.


Snite

Cronos Impera
03-08-2007, 13:49
I would like to be the King and Queen of Sealand....

Somebody Else
03-08-2007, 18:32
I would like to be the King and Queen of Sealand....
Hermaphrodite then, huh...

The Spartan (Returns)
03-08-2007, 22:03
'tis better to reign in Hell than to serve in Heaven.

Or was it the other way 'round.i'd rather serve in heaven but this does not relate to the question.

i say Gah!