What is your favourite Total War Game!?

[Omanes Alexandrapolites]

Hi there guys!
For the benefit of those dear people who plan on expanding their TW collection, I decided that perhaps I could set up this thread with the intent of highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of each great Total War game in turn and generally establishing which Total War is the .org member's personal favorites. So which game do you enjoy, thanks, cheers!

[sapi]

This is what, the 3rd this month? :inquisitive:

[Omanes Alexandrapolites]

This is what, the 3rd this month? :inquisitive:Second actually :grin:

[Lorenzo_H]

We do tend to have a lot of these types of threads.

[Xehh II]

Why would someone on this forum say they don't play total war games, whats the point?

[Lord Cazaric]

Because they can. Why else?

I voted MTW:Viking Invasion because that is the only one I've played. (well, MTW as well but the expansion is better)

[Xehh II]

Because they can. Why else
That is a stupid reason.

[Gawain of Orkeny]

Left out the best. NTW, but other than that VI rules.

[Omanes Alexandrapolites]

Why would someone on this forum say they don't play total war games...
If you want the truth, I put it in for the sheer irony.

[Lord Cazaric]

Xehh, that is not a stupid reason - it is the only reason. It's like when there is a poll:

Q: How many legs does a squirrel have?

and the answers are:

A) Two
B) Three
C) Four
D) The chipmunks ate their legs when they ran out of lemon cheesecake.

Who in their right mind would not vote D?

It is called a sense a humour, Xehh. If you're lucky, I'll teach you someday.

[Martok]

I know this may surprise those here that know me, but I actually voted "Gah!" While I don't deny I play MTW/VI more often than Shogun, I enjoy both so much that I really would have a hard time saying which is my favorite.

If I was being brutally honest with myself, I would maybe admit that I enjoyed Medieval a *teensy* bit more (mostly because of the time period & setting)....but a mouse could starve on the difference. In my mind, they're both superb games and are one virtually equal footing with each other. :yes:

[seireikhaan]

My favorite is MTW: VI, because it, in addition to MTW vanilla, is the only one I've played, though from what I've read, I am strongly considering getting shogun as well. I am not a huge RTS gamer, so I've been hesitant to get either Rome or MTW2. Also, I love the original gameplay the series began with, again, from what I've seen and heard about Shogun, and game creators have a tendency to shift their focus as they make more and more sequels to games and I would be among the people who don't like the shift in focus the games apparently took after MTW.

[Derfasciti]

Medieval Total War 2 for now at least. I love the time period and the game play. Not too much more to ask for.:2thumbsup:

[sapi]

Gah

The latest will always seem the best, and I haven't played a TW game in almost a month anyway.

[Caerfanan]

Gah as well: I have almost only played MTW:VI and love it SOOOO much that I haven't taken the time to try another.

[Lord Cazaric]

It is the most fun playing as the Hungarians I reckon. Or as the Sicilians - it is especially fun to have a Sicilian overlord in Muscovy...

But I'm stuck on the VI campaign map...is it even possible for someone playing as the Mercians to conquer the Norselands? I've taken over almost all of Britain and Ireland (including one province that cost me 4000 light cavalrymen to bring down 250 defenders. I suppose I should have checked to see what my army was made up of, but I just marched right in. 60 archers protected by 100 armoured spearmen sitting on a hilltop against an army of 8 trebuchets - all out of range - and 8 units of light horse on the battlefield can do incredible damage....and every damn reinforcement was mounted) but I can't make it to the east.

See? I can be serious too!

[cegorach]

MTW VI - still the best AI and most flexible to mod.:2thumbsup:

[caravel]

It is the most fun playing as the Hungarians I reckon. Or as the Sicilians - it is especially fun to have a Sicilian overlord in Muscovy...

But I'm stuck on the VI campaign map...is it even possible for someone playing as the Mercians to conquer the Norselands?
Send in you bishops, convert the provinces to Christianity, then place the best spies you've got in there to keep causing rebellions. Eventually the rebels will win and the Vikings will be wiped out from both provinces, then bribe the rebels. That is the only way to get to Hordaland and Jutland, without modding the game (assassinating the Viking leader won't work as a new one will always take his place, as with the HRE and Pope in the main 1087 - 1453 campaign).

[Caerfanan]

It is the most fun playing as the Hungarians I reckon. Or as the Sicilians - it is especially fun to have a Sicilian overlord in Muscovy...

But I'm stuck on the VI campaign map...is it even possible for someone playing as the Mercians to conquer the Norselands? I've taken over almost all of Britain and Ireland (including one province that cost me 4000 light cavalrymen to bring down 250 defenders. I suppose I should have checked to see what my army was made up of, but I just marched right in. 60 archers protected by 100 armoured spearmen sitting on a hilltop against an army of 8 trebuchets - all out of range - and 8 units of light horse on the battlefield can do incredible damage....and every damn reinforcement was mounted) but I can't make it to the east.

See? I can be serious too!

Well Lord Cazaric, glad to read your opinion there!!! :yes:

To take the viks, I wonder if it's possible to bribe viking armies if there is no king/heir in it without it being rebel... Never tried it: you don't actually need to conquer Hoardaland and Jutland to win.

And I love this Viking campaign!!!!

(ahem: did you use your special charging technique to win in Ireland? :laugh4: )