Pahlavan A.I.

[Magister Militum Titus Pullo]

I have played as the Romans, the Seleucids, the Ptolemys, the Averni and the Bactrians. In all those games, I've noticed that the Parthians never expand into Persia. I mean as the Seleucid faction, there wasn't any pressure to defend any eastern territories. Is it simply easier for nomad-based A.I. factions to assualt settlements with no defensive barriers?

I've just started playing as the Pahlava two weeks ago, and I targeted the Seleucid dominions in the south for the obvious benefit of access to superior infantry units. I've developed the routine of brigading cavalry (mostly horse-archers) together, and sending them to lands beyond my own frontiers to investigate th layout. Has anyone else done this as well? I know you can use diplomats, spies and assassins for just that reason, but I'm talking about large, mobile military expeditions operating within a thousand miles of your kingdoms borders as a pre-emptive or punitive measure. Just to massacre a couple of enemy field forces.

After conquering the Indian kingdoms last night, I was disappointed that I couldn't recruit elephants. Is there any place the Parthians can acquire elephants?

[Tellos Athenaios]

Lucky you. In my Seleukid game they full-stacked invaded Hyrkania by 267 BC -ish... Totally anihilated them, of course. And the Baktrians as well. Don't like that sort of jokers who tear all my alliances apart. :clown:

[C.LVCIANVS]

In my campaigns I've seen pahlavans expansions principally in southern areas, Hyrkania, Parthava ecc. often after AS rebellions of their cities along borders, +- 240 B.C. A war between AS and Baktria helps, and a more aggressive Saka (touching the core_attitude in descr_strat :juggle2:)push them out of steppe. Could it be a slow expansion, but sometimes I've seen Pahlavans in Phraaspa around 230 B.C.

[Lovejoy]

I'm pretty sure Pahvlan can recruit elephantes in india, atleast in the most southern settlement. I know I did. I cant remember if its the local or the factional MIC you need though. :balloon2:

[MarcusAureliusAntoninus]

Due to the new Parthian system and the stronger rebels (in the north to deter northern expansion), I've noticed that Pahlav AI does a whole lot better in the interal versions. In my latest campaign, they invaded Seleucid territory and are doing quite well.

Parthia does get elephants. It is probably on tier 4 of the barracks (probably regional, but I'm not sure).

[C.LVCIANVS]

:playingball:
Waiting for next release.:hourglass: :laugh4:

[Morte66]

Due to the new Parthian system and the stronger rebels (in the north to deter northern expansion)

You mean they're going to be stronger in the next release?

Wow, they already deterred my northern expansion pretty thoroughly. After getting my ass handed to me by the Alans, I invaded Bactria this afternoon (which proved much easier).

[MarcusAureliusAntoninus]

In the 081 series, the rebels often went broke and failed to be a good challenge. This has been fixed for the next version.

[Tellos Athenaios]

Yeah, failure to take Eleutheroi settlement = :skull:

Pontos mucked up; and I had to remove 2 full stacks of considerable strength because of it.

[Magister Militum Titus Pullo]

You can never trust your allies in this game. I've been bribing Pontos, Aigytos and the Saba into attacking Arche Seleukeia, only they just sit on their frigging hands or attack another country.

[russia almighty]

I've seen them becoming freaking powerful . I was playing as Rome and by the time I got to the ME they controlled most of the former Seleucid empire plus they axed the Bactrians and took over India .