PDA

View Full Version : Nebraska Senator Sues God to Stop Terror Threats



R'as al Ghul
09-19-2007, 12:17
From here (http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/)

Nebraska State Senator Ernie Chambers (D - Omaha) filed suit against God Friday, asking a court to order the Almighty and his followers to stop making terrorist threats.

The suit (.pdf (http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/files/chambersversusgod.pdf)), filed in a Nebraska district court, contends that God, along with his followers of all persuasions, "has made and continues to make terroristic threats of grave harm to innumerable persons." Those threats are credible given God's history, Chambers' complaint says.

Chambers, in a fit of alliteration, also accuses God of causing "fearsome floods, egregious earthquakes, horrendous hurricanes, terrifying tornadoes, pestilential plagues, ferocious famines, devastating droughts, genocidal wars, birth defects, and the like."

Likewise the suit accuses God of having his chroniclers "disseminate in written form, said admissions, throughout the Earth in order to inspire fear, dread, anxiety, terror and uncertainty, in order to coerce obedience to Defendant's will."

Chambers, who has represented Omaha, Nebraska since 1970, asked the Douglas County district court for summary judgment or to set a quick hearing date "if the Court deems such a hearing not to be a futile act."

The senator also wants the court to issue a permanent injunction prohibiting God from issuing plagues and terrorist threats. It's unclear how this could work since God is usually understood to be all powerful.

Chambers does admit that God is omnipresent and omniscient, however. Since God is everywhere, the Nebraska court has jurisdiction, Chambers argues, and since God is all-knowing, Chambers need not serve him with a notice of the lawsuit.

The lawsuit indicates that Chambers attempted to make God appear in order to serve him by saying "Come out, come out, wherever you are," but the Almight declined, like many defendants, to make it easy for a plaintiff to serve him with court papers.

Chambers filed the suit to make a point that the state constitution allows lawsuits to be filed for any reason, according to WOWT.

Attempts to reach Chambers for comment were unsuccessful.

God did not immediately respond to a non-denominational prayer for comment by this reporter.

The suit is Chambers v. God.



This time we'll get him... :clown:

R'as al Ghul
09-19-2007, 12:31
:oops: This was already posted in "News of the Weird".
Forgive me.

FactionHeir
09-19-2007, 12:36
Yup, blame me :laugh4:
Original post in News of the Weird (https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showpost.php?p=1678209&postcount=941)

R'as al Ghul
09-19-2007, 12:39
Yup, blame me :laugh4:

Why just blame when I can sue you? :laugh4:

FactionHeir
09-19-2007, 12:39
Nah, you'd have to sue god. He's responsible! :grin2:

R'as al Ghul
09-19-2007, 12:43
Nah, you'd have to sue god. He's responsible! :grin2:

I'll wait for the sentence first.

Fragony
09-19-2007, 13:05
Good luck getting a lawyer there

Husar
09-19-2007, 13:25
I would be funny if that Senator now got struck by a lightning in his backyard... :laugh4:

Makes me wonder who will defend god in court?

Zaknafien
09-19-2007, 14:12
the pope?

Gregoshi
09-19-2007, 14:17
The Senator loses the case the moment the first witness raises their right hand and places their left on the Bible...:laugh4:

And if he wins, good luck collecting...

And if he manages to collect, all that money will have "In God we trust" printed on it. :laugh4:

Whether I believed in Him or not, God is the last person I'd want to piss of for the sake of demonstrating the absurdity of frivilous lawsuits. I'd pick some one safer like Paris Hilton, who would also appreciate the publicity seeing as she hasn't made the headlines in nearly three weeks.

Geoffrey S
09-19-2007, 19:36
But then, God hasn't really been making the headlines Himself recently, could do with some good press.

ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88
09-19-2007, 19:41
stupid idoits. It better get throwed out or this country is going to hell.

Seamus Fermanagh
09-19-2007, 20:01
the pope?

At present, Rice would probably deny him a visa....

AntiochusIII
09-19-2007, 20:10
stupid idoits. It better get throwed out or this country is going to hell.*cough satire cough*

The Senator is being satirical. And for God's sake I hope he wins.

spmetla
09-20-2007, 02:35
If he wins the lottery will it be considered even?

Marshal Murat
09-20-2007, 02:47
'If the cross don't fit, you must acquit!'

Boyar Son
09-20-2007, 03:25
ya well, some pple are complete idiots and, others arent....

Seamus Fermanagh
09-20-2007, 03:45
ya well, some pple are complete idiots and, others arent....

Some days are rainy, others aren't....

Boyar Son
09-20-2007, 03:46
but how is this guy gonna pull it off?

Gregoshi
09-20-2007, 03:52
but how is this guy gonna pull it off?
Do you think he doesn't have a prayer COSSACK?

Boyar Son
09-20-2007, 03:54
Do you think he doesn't have a prayer COSSACK?

:laugh4: :laugh4:

InsaneApache
09-20-2007, 08:57
Now then, he said he's going to sue god, but which one? :inquisitive:

The father, the son or the holy ghost. Mebbe allah, vishnu or baal? Perhaps he's going way back to gaia and the hundred handed ones?

Ah the choices one has in life! :laugh4:

Pannonian
09-20-2007, 09:36
Now then, he said he's going to sue god, but which one? :inquisitive:

The father, the son or the holy ghost. Mebbe allah, vishnu or baal? Perhaps he's going way back to gaia and the hundred handed ones?

Ah the choices one has in life! :laugh4:
Don't some of the eastern religions believe that one can find God in oneself? In which case, is he suing himself?

Husar
09-20-2007, 09:38
The father, the son or the holy ghost. Mebbe allah,
Allah is just the arabic word for God in a monotheistic sense, not a different god than the one in Christianity(the difference lies in how you believe he should be worshipped). If you have different gods(polytheistic), the word for god is ilah IIRC(it does pay off to talk to Faisal in the chat :beam: ).

Also the father, the son and the holy ghost, are they one entitity in front of the law or three different ones? I guess that could be a difficult one to judge given the peculiarities of the trinity. Now if we're going to sue a hundred handed one, does he need 50 bibles to swear on or? Well, if he exists it makes no sense to swear on any bible since, well, you get my point.:sweatdrop:

CountArach
09-20-2007, 09:47
Now then, he said he's going to sue god, but which one? :inquisitive:

The father, the son or the holy ghost. Mebbe allah, vishnu or baal? Perhaps he's going way back to gaia and the hundred handed ones?

Ah the choices one has in life! :laugh4:
He is suing Aeth.

Ronin
09-20-2007, 09:52
the paperwork on this is gonna be a *****! :laugh4:

Sigurd
09-20-2007, 09:59
I guess he is suing the first cause or the necessary being?
Nah.. the reason for taking the first cause to the court is the first cause's continuous involvment in letting bad things happen to innocent people. :inquisitive:

... I thought only the mormons believe in continous revelation and Godly visitations. The others seem to have closed the heavens with their Deistic beliefs.

:idea2:

Oh.. wait. The Mormons are quite rich aren't they?

Mikeus Caesar
09-20-2007, 12:53
Some Romanian guy recently tried to sue God, but they had to withdraw the case as the defendant could not be found...

ELITEofWARMANGINGERYBREADMEN88
09-20-2007, 16:14
SO if He wins......

How he going to collect? :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4: :laugh4:

FactionHeir
09-20-2007, 16:17
Go from church to church taking the donations? :laugh4:

FactionHeir
09-21-2007, 05:20
Looks like he got an answer (http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/20/suing.god.ap/index.html)

CountArach
09-21-2007, 05:58
He had me at "often criticizes Christians".

Gregoshi
09-21-2007, 07:53
Looks like he got an answer (http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/20/suing.god.ap/index.html)
God is the answer, right? Or is it Jesus? Or 42? Now I'm confused. :dizzy2:

macsen rufus
09-21-2007, 11:19
How can an omnipresent being be outside any jurisdiction? :inquisitive:

Papewaio
09-21-2007, 11:55
But how could be be contained within a jurisdiction?

So surely he would always exceed the boundaries of any jurisdiction.

FactionHeir
09-21-2007, 12:00
How about the International Court of Justice?

Sigurd
09-21-2007, 12:46
How about the International Court of Justice?
Still not big enough for an omnipresence.

macsen rufus
09-21-2007, 12:58
Well, if you can't get Mr Big, there are plenty of other agents, subordinates and representatives, same as any other racket ~D

Gregoshi
09-21-2007, 18:42
Well, if you can't get Mr Big, there are plenty of other agents, subordinates and representatives, same as any other racket ~D
There's a slippery slope I'd rather not attempt.