TheLastPrivate
09-30-2007, 08:22
Even with kingdoms and addition of new units, I seem to find quite a few units that carries the "redundant" banner.
Khassaki and royal mamluks look the same, have same stats, and really seem to bear no difference in tech tree, so what is the point of khassakis as a new unit? Sure khassaki has cairo requirement, but lets face it: thats not enough difference to call something "new", to be honest.
If its the difference between pavise crossbowmen and pavise crossbowmen militia, then I would understand but whats up with khassaki and royal mamluks? Might as well called the khassaki "cairo mamluks" and nothing will seem different other than the icon on the bottom.
At least cataphracts and archontopulai have slightly different stats, whats the deal with khassaki and royal mamluks, seriously.
Im wondering whether the Khassaki have that myserious "high lethality factor other than stats" that differentiate them at ALL, or just a lazy copy-n-paste job from CA.
Khassaki and royal mamluks look the same, have same stats, and really seem to bear no difference in tech tree, so what is the point of khassakis as a new unit? Sure khassaki has cairo requirement, but lets face it: thats not enough difference to call something "new", to be honest.
If its the difference between pavise crossbowmen and pavise crossbowmen militia, then I would understand but whats up with khassaki and royal mamluks? Might as well called the khassaki "cairo mamluks" and nothing will seem different other than the icon on the bottom.
At least cataphracts and archontopulai have slightly different stats, whats the deal with khassaki and royal mamluks, seriously.
Im wondering whether the Khassaki have that myserious "high lethality factor other than stats" that differentiate them at ALL, or just a lazy copy-n-paste job from CA.