Log in

View Full Version : U.S. Presidential politics: And Now On to ... Wyoming?



Odin
01-04-2008, 21:22
And Now On to ... Wyoming? (http://news.yahoo.com/s/time/20080104/us_time/andnowontowyoming)

Text And Now On to ... Wyoming? By PAT DAWSON

Now that Iowa is done with its caucuses, get ready for the first primary of the season. No, not New Hampshire. Wyoming.


On Saturday, Jan. 5, Republicans in Dick Cheney's home state will hold their own renegade primary. It is a huge risk for the state G.O.P. They moved up the primary date without the blessing of Republican National Committee and will lose half their convention delegates for violating the rules. But there may be a big payoff: Wyoming could further confirm front-runner status for Mike Huckabee and give him momentum into the Jan. 8 primary in New Hampshire - or provide Mitt Romney with his first, if minor, stop of what might be a Huckabee steamroller.


Wyoming's Republican leaders, emboldened by a tradition of stubborn independence and weary of obscurity, are pressing ahead in spite of the national party's objections. After the state central committee voted in August to go early, Tom Sansonetti, organizer of the county-level conventions, said it was worth it: "There was a solid consensus by everybody that the price of playing in the nomination process was worth the loss of the delegates." Abiding by Republican National Committee rules and holding the county conventions later, Sansonetti said, would "doom the Wyoming Republican Party to being a non-player, with no visits, no phone calls, no direct mail, by the national candidates."


So far, however, the move has had rather tepid results. Just three candidates showed up for Wyoming's G.O.P. presidential forums in September: Kansas Sen. Sam Brownback (who has since dropped out), California Rep. Duncan Hunter and Fred Thompson. Later visits to the state have been made by Mitt Romney, Ron Paul and Mike Huckabee. Rudy Giuliani and John McCain have been no-shows.


Romney's organization has been the most visible, busily mobilizing campaign supporters among Wyoming's Mormons, who make up about 10% of the state's population. Precinct delegates headed for the Jan. 5 nominating conventions have also received mailings from Paul and Thompson.


The problem, however, is that Wyoming may declare for no clear favorite of its own on Jan. 5. Jan Larimer, Wyoming's national-level state committeewoman, who will lose her own 2008 convention seat under the RNC penalty, says, "It would be nice if we had a winner. I have no sense of any favorite so far. I think we're going to have a very mixed bag. I think we're going to have quite a few undecided, those not bound to support any one candidate." The 12 delegates who will be chosen on Saturday each have to represent a candidate. However, because the campaigns have been so inactive in Wyoming, it is possible that some delegates will be designated without being committed to a candidate at all. And if a majority of these are picked, Wyoming will end up being... undecided.


She says Wyoming's maverick experiment is fraught with uncertainty, unlike Iowa and New Hampshire. "They have their system honed," she says. "It's taken them decades to get that way. For our folks in Wyoming, this is the first time in choosing our delegates early and it has been a real learning curve for us. We have a lot of folks not paying attention. They need to understand that they're in the forefront of this and people are going to be watching."


It's also not clear what issues, if any, will stir Wyoming's G.O.P. primary votes. At the G.O.P. presidential forum in Casper, candidate proclamations of gun-owner rights drew standing ovations, and loud applause rewarded statements urging continued development and use of fossil fuels - a big issue for a state booming with coal mining, oil and natural-gas drilling. Larimer says immigration is a major issue in the state, surpassing the Iraq war. "People want to close the borders," she says. But retired Wyoming U.S. Senator Alan K. Simpson believes that, though "immigration has been a federal failure of will, [it is] not an issue for a President but for Congress. Show me a one-issue guy and I will stay away from him."


Simpson also noted that Wyoming voters have an independent streak. "I don't know why we get stereotyped as a solid Republican state," he said, listing all the Democratic governors in recent years. Still, the state's congressional delegation has been exclusively Republican for the past 30 years (Dick Cheney was elected to the House in 1978) and a Democratic presidential candidate hasn't carried the state since 1964.



Will Wyoming Republicans regret their experiment? "I think the jury is still out," says Larimer, who contends that the risk will prove worthwhile only "if we pick a winner on Jan. 5. If it comes out undecided," she adds, "that would not be a good thing for our process."


Wyoming's Democrats, by the way, are not making waves; they have scheduled their primary for March 8.

A side dish for the pending NH primary. While its hardly the main event delegates are delegates. Just a side point of intrest to those intrested in the US presidential race and its dynamics, you know who you are.

ICantSpellDawg
01-07-2008, 15:56
Romney wins!!!

If he loses in NH tomorrow, he will still have more delegates than any Republican candidate.

He came in second in Iowa
He Came in first in Wyoming
(first or second) in NH?

The guy came from a virtually unknown status among Washington insiders a year ago and you would have been hard pressed to find someone who had heard of him even 6 months ago unless they were in Mass or more politically savvy in surrounding states.

Now he is the punching bag because he is viewed as a front-runner. His policies are interesting and unique, his personality is being described as "too good to be true" and people don't like the idea that people can change their mind about an issue ONCE. He is the center right candidate with the least baggage and the best record.

I am totally impressed with this guy and I hope that people start really listening to him speak.

Xiahou
01-07-2008, 18:48
His policies are interesting and unique, his personality is being described as "too good to be true" and people don't like the idea that people can change their mind about an issue ONCE. He is the center right candidate with the least baggage and the best record.
It's not that he changed his mind, it's how it conveniently changed in time for the GOP primaries. That combined with needlessly false or at the very least, misleading statements while campaigning and I have good reason to doubt the sincerity of his mind changes. :shrug:

ICantSpellDawg
01-07-2008, 18:57
How do you feel about his record?

Does he make your skin crawl like Huckabee?

Would you vote for him against Obama, Edwards or Clinton?

Vladimir
01-07-2008, 19:31
Would you vote for him against Obama, Edwards or Clinton?

That's the only important question regarding any of the Republican candidates. Choose the lesser evil from the two parties.

ICantSpellDawg
01-07-2008, 20:35
That's the only important question regarding any of the Republican candidates. Choose the lesser evil from the two parties.

I can tell you now. A Huckabee win would make me vote for Obama. A Giuliani win would make me consider it. A Thompson win would make me trod to the voting booth with a frown on my face. Same with McCain.

If Paul won I would probably have a heart attack from joy.
If Keyes won I would probably question the intelligence of the American public BEFORE I jumped for joy.

If Romney wins, I will feel comfortable about the future of the country. I would campaign for him until the last vote was cast. I would be happy with the outcome of the race either way, even if (probably) Obama wins.

Ice
01-07-2008, 20:54
How do you feel about his record?

Does he make your skin crawl like Huckabee?

Would you vote for him against Obama, Edwards or Clinton?

1) Meh

2) No as much, but he certainly comes close.

3) Obama-No
Edwards- Yes
Clinton- Yes

Odin
01-07-2008, 21:05
How do you feel about his record?

Does he make your skin crawl like Huckabee?

Would you vote for him against Obama, Edwards or Clinton?

1. He raised fee's for liscenses and various permits to the tune of 500 million dollars.

2. Supported and implemented a 2 cent gas tax increase.

3. Cut state spending by 1.6 billion dollars including 700 million reduction to towns.

4. Signed the massachusetts health reform law, requiring all mass citizens to have health insurance or face a tax penalty.

5. labored under a hostile democratic majority in both the house and senate.

Now those few things come to mind as a Mass resident. Romney inhereted a massive deficit and pulled us out of it. He did it and he worked with the state legislature to do it.

He isnt bad, hes a dam good CEO and could probably co exsist with a democratic legislature at the federa level. Mostly my impressions and feelings toward him are positive, however the universal health care bill has some short comings as the projection of corporate fee's that were to help bolster the revenue hasnt happened.

All said and done romney did what he had to do in MA and made compramises that were not sexy for a republican. Overall he isnt a bad choice for president but when faced with real opposition to his programs he can sling the mud with the best of them.

ICantSpellDawg
01-07-2008, 22:42
1. He raised fee's for liscenses and various permits to the tune of 500 million dollars.

2. Supported and implemented a 2 cent gas tax increase.

3. Cut state spending by 1.6 billion dollars including 700 million reduction to towns.

4. Signed the massachusetts health reform law, requiring all mass citizens to have health insurance or face a tax penalty.

5. labored under a hostile democratic majority in both the house and senate.

Now those few things come to mind as a Mass resident. Romney inhereted a massive deficit and pulled us out of it. He did it and he worked with the state legislature to do it.

He isnt bad, hes a dam good CEO and could probably co exsist with a democratic legislature at the federa level. Mostly my impressions and feelings toward him are positive, however the universal health care bill has some short comings as the projection of corporate fee's that were to help bolster the revenue hasnt happened.

All said and done romney did what he had to do in MA and made compramises that were not sexy for a republican. Overall he isnt a bad choice for president but when faced with real opposition to his programs he can sling the mud with the best of them.

I agree. I'm sure that you knew I would:2thumbsup: