Log in

View Full Version : What faction to play as?



Markus_Aurelius
01-13-2008, 21:21
Ive been away from EB for a bit (yeah I know, Blasphemous) and now that im back, i cant decide what faction to play as. Im up for anything really. what do you guys think i should play as?

Hax
01-13-2008, 21:22
Try Saba, they look very interesting, never done it myself!

Intranetusa
01-13-2008, 22:09
Try Greeks, Epieros, or Macedonians :)

Hooahguy
01-13-2008, 22:16
or the getai........
EDIT: to add, the getai have the best infantry in the game......

Mediolanicus
01-13-2008, 22:18
I'd go along with Sab'yn!

Good position to start in, but it get's harder once you're around 250 B.C.

Uncle Odin
01-13-2008, 22:18
Saba is very interesting, as you have quiet an isolated starting Position to build up your economy, but sooner or later you end up in a war against AS and the Ptolies, which is quiet hard...:skull: :skull: :skull:

The Sweboz really rock:yes: :yes: :yes:

About Epeiros I can only say, that they are quiet easy, if you can blitz the Maks in the first few turns with your starting army and keep the Romans away fram Taras.

I hope this helps you a little bit.

Did I mention the Swebos really rock the game. Right now I´m rolling over the romans... :beam: :beam: :beam:

antisocialmunky
01-13-2008, 22:46
The Iberian Faction.

Markus_Aurelius
01-13-2008, 23:28
hmm, your sweboz comments really tempt me....

but the saba seem pretty nice...

Uncle Odin
01-13-2008, 23:34
With the Sewboz you have the great advantage, that your generals get the forager trait, which gives them the ability to roam in foreign territory as long as they want and it saves some money. This is really cool ans afaik the sweboz are the only faction to have this ability...

Try to combine Germanic Naked Spearman and Chatti Clubinfantry, you´ll really gone like it.

BTW Saba is fine to, only way more difficult, as I can recall. :sweatdrop: :sweatdrop:

Markus_Aurelius
01-13-2008, 23:35
After reading that aar, the spear and shield, im thinking the sab'yn are a good choice, he actually was beaten by the computer!

Markus_Aurelius
01-13-2008, 23:37
so i think im going saba, but definatly will check out the sweboz when im done

Uncle Odin
01-13-2008, 23:40
Yeah, I really liked his AAR and played Saba afterwards. It´s great fun and they have some really good units. But nothing that can stand against a phalanx iirc. Have a lot of fun and report how it´s going on, if you like. I would be very pleased to read an other Saba AAr...

So good luck in the damm´n desert. :egypt: :clown: :egypt:

PershsNhpios
01-14-2008, 02:01
I suggest the Getai, I find them very easy to play with.
Their troop selection is quite vast due to the amount of auxiliaries available.
As for myself, I decided to forsake the victory conditions, (So as not to become embarrassed in a war against the Republic), and conquer the black sea.
So far, I have from Tanais counterclockwise to Byzantium, I own from the countries of the Bastarnae south to Demetrias.
All of the Hellenes and the Makedonians, 'dance to my tune', and I have found this goal very gratifying, as it has led me into war and diplomatic situations with many different factions.
Currently I am, by navy, landing and bypassing Kotais with a large army, and attacking Armavir.. in order to keep clear of the Seleukids until Parthia grows strong enough.

My method of attack with the Getic Kingdom and it's allies is usually thus;
I have one general with the cavalry, (Consisting of many Skythian archer allies and, now that I am richer, some of my own Tarabostes in support.), ride against the enemy army or town.
The horse archers will attack and kill well over a third of the army, without losing any themselves, the Tarabostes reinforce this.
If they attack a town, I make sure it will sally upon me, so that the destruction can be as fulfilling.

Then my regiment battalion usually consists of 1-2 Heavy Getic Phalanxes, 2-4 Light Phalanxes, 2-3 Skythian Axemen/Classical Hoplites/Drapanai/Bastarnae, and 3 Bosphoran Archer allies.
The latter being now my most favoured unit, thanks to their superb ability in flanking also.
A major defeat has only occurred as I was conquering the Crimea, and I came without cavalry against the large army of Bosphoritai.
The arrows rained so thickly I peered through them to see my ranks!

Here is my recommendation of the Getai then, once I have control of the Black Sea, I intend to launch a heavily guarded scientific expedition in order that my more educated Getic citizens can study the Great Pyramids.
Once I have acquainted myself with the locals in Alexandria, the goal for me faction is to have African Elephants serving in the army in Kilikia!

Markus_Aurelius
01-14-2008, 03:06
So far I am enjoying the Saba very much. But i can see alot of trouble brewing in my future. I managed to take the 4 settlements around the coast pretty early on, making full use of my Archer spearmen, damn good soldiers. Im building mines as was the advice of the "How to play Saba effectively thread" and im rdoing pretty good, very fun, hard to stop playing. I notice all my troops have very very low defence ratings and am wondering if anybody has any advice on how i should go about beating the Yellow and Gray deaths? Im thinking i should try and get some phalanx's of my own, if thats even possible, are pantodipoi or whatever phalanxs recruitable by the saba? or am i f***ed haha

Mouzafphaerre
01-14-2008, 03:42
.
I've been playing Lusotana, Makedonia and Saba; would recommend all. :yes: Next will most probably be Sauromatae. :charge:
.

Uncle Odin
01-14-2008, 16:15
I´m quite sure you can´t recruit phalnxes in arabia. Just some Red Sea Hoplites in your capital city.

A good strategie to kill phalanxes is to pelt aproaching phlanxes with arabian slinger and archer spearman, pin them down with the named spearman and flank them with red sea light infantry or your general... Best keep some cav beheind to kill the routing enemy troops, so they will not come back.

I hope this was a little bit usefull. :beam: :beam:

Tristuskhan
01-14-2008, 17:32
My first 1.0 campaign is an Epirote one, but it's just a teaser. Serious stuff will begin when I start a Parthian campaign... Aegean factions are a good choice if you have not played EB for long, IMO.

NeoSpartan
01-14-2008, 19:16
Im thinking i should try and get some phalanx's of my own, if thats even possible, are pantodipoi or whatever phalanxs recruitable by the saba? or am i f***ed haha

Mercenaries :yes: although now they are pretty expensive to buy so u better take good care of them.

Imperial Fist
01-18-2008, 17:08
Try every faction u want, all r interesting, but dont try the romans. U just get ordinary units at the beginning, especially a crap of cavalry(except eqvites extraordinari). Compared to the "almighty greeks" your core army is bunch of amateurs. Then ull get some nice reformes if u manage to activate them. Past-reform units(i mean the marian and the augustan) are a bit better, but only a bit.

Pezlu
01-18-2008, 18:40
Actually I'm playing with the romani and their units don't seem that bad... if used properly of course. I'm in Polybian times now, but I'm still using the camillan units that where still around when the reform happened. Effectively.

Maybe they are not as powerful as the elite units of other factions, but Roman's elite units are pedites/equites extraordinarii after all... and before Marian times you have to rely a lot on locals, since you can have romans only in italy; so you can get some good troops here and there (ok, not many; but still there are Neitos and Brihentin only a few provinces north...).

About roman's cavalry: equites romani suck, i agree, but the roman army is mainly based on heavy melee infantry and that makes a good work.

Imperial Fist
01-18-2008, 20:10
Actually I'm playing with the romani and their units don't seem that bad... if used properly of course. I'm in Polybian times now, but I'm still using the camillan units that where still around when the reform happened. Effectively.

Maybe they are not as powerful as the elite units of other factions, but Roman's elite units are pedites/equites extraordinarii after all... and before Marian times you have to rely a lot on locals, since you can have romans only in italy; so you can get some good troops here and there (ok, not many; but still there are Neitos and Brihentin only a few provinces north...).

About roman's cavalry: equites romani suck, i agree, but the roman army is mainly based on heavy melee infantry and that makes a good work.

I am or better was playing romani until today. As a romani fan i should like them, but unfortunatly i dont.
I have given up playing because i just got pissed off by 2 facts:
1. and most annoying: the reform conditions for the romani.
Ok polybian reforms r eazy to get, but when it comes to marian reforms the porbs begin. I have 5 plebs on the whole map and only 2 of em r sharp/char/vig.
Only 1 guy has everything u need to iniciate the reforms and the the thing with 45 provinces is also done. What happenes? Nothing for about 4 years nothing( and i was already in 159bc). To conquer 90 provinces is just nonesense! I dont wanna fight in asia minor and send reinforcements from italy(what takes u 1 whole year fromt taras harbor) or just use mercs or regional auxillia.

2. I just cant emagine how the hell some light troops like orindary iberi caetraii(or compareable) r able to cut princepes xp 3 bronze chevrons into pieces. I know they use ap weapons, but what has that to do with balance?

Ill try to play as romani again, but in 2 or 3 weeks or so.

Pezlu
01-18-2008, 22:08
I am or better was playing romani until today. As a romani fan i should like them, but unfortunatly i dont.
I have given up playing because i just got pissed off by 2 facts:
1. and most annoying: the reform conditions for the romani.
Ok polybian reforms r eazy to get, but when it comes to marian reforms the porbs begin. I have 5 plebs on the whole map and only 2 of em r sharp/char/vig.
Only 1 guy has everything u need to iniciate the reforms and the the thing with 45 provinces is also done. What happenes? Nothing for about 4 years nothing( and i was already in 159bc). To conquer 90 provinces is just nonesense! I dont wanna fight in asia minor and send reinforcements from italy(what takes u 1 whole year fromt taras harbor) or just use mercs or regional auxillia.

2. I just cant emagine how the hell some light troops like orindary iberi caetraii(or compareable) r able to cut princepes xp 3 bronze chevrons into pieces. I know they use ap weapons, but what has that to do with balance?

Ill try to play as romani again, but in 2 or 3 weeks or so.

I don't have many problems with principes... Yeah, they are not the best heavy infantry around, but they do their job fairly well...

I saw the requirements for the marian reform and I agree, you need A LOT of luck to get them. Unless you know exactly what affects the assignment of the necessary traits, like becoming consul, and have time (and will) to work on the few generals that could become "Marius". I have seen a few other posts with people who had some difficulty getting the reform so it's probably not just an impression... it is really that difficult.

I'll see...

beatoangelico
01-18-2008, 23:40
2. I just cant emagine how the hell some light troops like orindary iberi caetraii(or compareable) r able to cut princepes xp 3 bronze chevrons into pieces. I know they use ap weapons, but what has that to do with balance?


roman infantry is not meant to beat everything on 1vs1, it's a reliable, cheap, all-round infantry that excells at stabilizing the front, allowing multiple flanking actions

konny
01-19-2008, 13:57
I agree that the Roman Reforms are a bit hard to get, in particular compared to the easy way the other factions get their Reforms. I would strongly recommend to alter the conditions by hand when playing them (for example, I had tied them to the number of provinces owned only, according to about the number of lands the Romans historicaly held when reforming their army).


2. I just cant emagine how the hell some light troops like orindary iberi caetraii(or compareable) r able to cut princepes xp 3 bronze chevrons into pieces. I know they use ap weapons, but what has that to do with balance?

The Roman units are not bad at all.

The Camillan Hastati are cheaper and, due to their AP-Pila, better than the Pletastai (would be the Greek equivalent to them). The Camillan Principes are not of the best units, certainly.Their underhand spears and loose formations forbids to use them against Hoplites and Phalanxes and makes them inferior to swordfighters. They are best used against Celtic spearmen or other underhand spearfighters, and of course cavalry. The Camillan Triarii are amongst the best Hoplites in the game. They are much better than Haploi and Classicals (or the Karthagian equivalent) and do outnumber elite Hoplites, which can anyways only be recruited by KH.

Of the Polybian units, the Principes are certainly the best; forerunners of the later Reformed Cohorts. Provided you don't let them fight against serious odds, they should be able to fight everything down. That is save for heavy cavalry, for that your best unit in Polybian times are the Triarii.

In elite the Romans can muster the allready mentioned Extraordinarii and, in the early game, the Samnitici Milites. Both are able to force their way through every foe, even phalanx when taking heavy casualties into account. I use them very much in assaults on towns. In street fights 1on1 they can take the full advantage of their heavy armour, AP swords, dense formation and large shields.


Cavalry is the downside of the Roman army; but that's ok. The Romans do not field a Hellenistic Successor army and they are not the only one lacking decent horsemen (ever played the Sweboz!).


Now to your particular problem: Iberi Caetrarii are amongst the best units in the game. They look like nothing but 200 men, not to bad armoured with AP swords can make mincemeat out of most units. When playing Karthago one should always have at least two of them in the line up. Let them loose on the flanks of the Ptolemaic phalanxes and you'll see all those shining Agema melt away like snow in the desert. From my Romani and Karthagian campaigns I have learned to respect them as much as Gaesatae and would only attack them with superior numbers and supported by cavalry.

Imperial Fist
01-19-2008, 19:15
Yeah, i played sweboz. The guys rock, even without cav support. As soon as your eco is strong enuogh to provide germanic swordsman and phalangites u can slaughter almost everything. In my sweboz game bastarnolandam had a loylist revolt and i got a nice little city gratis.:2thumbsup: That was fun, because i was able to take crimea although my experienced armies stood in northern italy and southern gallia.
But to mention the romans again: Next time i invade iberia with the romans i just wont make the mistake and take princepes to this front only to watch them beeing slaugthered by light infantry.

Obelics
01-19-2008, 19:31
loving the challenge, if i play the Romans, i like it is difficult, cause you have to sent reinforcement from faraway provinces. And the battles are quite difficult.

The problem is when i play whatever other faction. Take Carthage or Epeiros or even KH, I expect to have some good challenge against Roma playing as one of these factions, but Rome is a very weak contender, i never felt scared. Instead, if i have to faces the Tolemaics or the Seleucids, they are a big pain cause their uber phalanxes and their strong melee infantry (galatian kleurikoi...), and their super cavalry... hmmm.

Even with the gauls is so easy to destroy romans stacks. Just put a line of Geroas in "Hold position", and strike in the back with the brihentin of the general...

Some one who is expert in roman military warfare should open a Thread like "Roman faction under-powered" like those threads opened by German fans.

Wolfman
01-19-2008, 19:37
I recommend the Saba for the reasons that were stated in the above post about them. Plus i just love the Saba and anything that has to do with Arabia. Second Faction I reccomend is the Getai. Glenn pretty much hit it right on the nail about them. Third faction are the Saka. I just love these guys. It starts out kinda hard plus you have that crappy steppe economy but it gets easier later on since they get reforms which allow them to train Hellenic ,indo-hellenic, and Indian troops.

marodeur
01-22-2008, 15:29
Either pontos or the getai. Pontos has access to lots of new troops in 1.0, so I would prefer them.

Parallel Pain
01-23-2008, 05:23
Well I just made my way through Saka VH/VH

So what's the hardest faction that doesn't have Horse Archers under 800 upkeep (or maybe no horse archers at all), as I'm sure I'll just blast everyone away with HA if I have them.

Beefy187
01-23-2008, 07:07
If your up for a challenge try Saba. Lusos are quite fun too

LorDBulA
01-23-2008, 08:24
Well I just made my way through Saka VH/VH

Congrats.

Try plying with General Camera. This should be a challenge.
Also add some houserules. For example never fight bridge battles, unless you are attacking.

Mouzafphaerre
01-23-2008, 11:58
.
Lusos are a walk in the park. :clown:

Try Saba for a challenge. :yes:
.

Parallel Pain
01-23-2008, 12:33
Congrats.

Try plying with General Camera. This should be a challenge.
Also add some houserules. For example never fight bridge battles, unless you are attacking.

Actually I never did really use bridges in Saka, only a handful of battles. With Horse Archer open plain is better than bridge.

And I'll pass on the General Camera, it'll make swarming too hard.

Skandaz.Imperator
01-23-2008, 13:57
1. Getai - Falx and phalanxes, what can go wrong? Oh, and armies of horse-archers too...

2. Saba - Watch out for the Ptolies and you're good to go. Beware of the slow pace of the campaign as your generels are not mounted and the geographical location to the edge of Arabia.

3. Sweboz - The most interesting infantry, with naked spearmen painted black and there's always reforms to strive for.

Hellenic_Hoplite
01-24-2008, 08:46
I can't belive no one has mentioned Baktria? I found them to be quite an intereasting challenge when I played as them. they have the Seleucids, Parthians and the Barbarians to the north to deal with. (sorry I forgot that factions name) Their starting position is both an advantage and a disadvantage due to the fact it's hard to get an army through those long plains and mountain ranges and the longer that army takes to get to a city the longer you're going to go bankrupt. not only that but the nearest (decent) rebel cities are full of elephants and savage hordes of men from the fartherest reaches of the east. to sum it up: You have to contend with 3 nations, You have poor cities, and it takes a while to get an invasion force anywhere.

edit*

Sorry about some of the grammer errors, it was very late at night when I made this post.

clibanarii immortal
01-24-2008, 09:57
Currently playing as Hayasdan, maybe you should try, and appeasement of AS is very important, there'll also be frequent transgressions and if you let your guard down and only use one unit/ a general's unit as a garrison, the trangressing armies would kill you (that's why I had to restart several times)
(strangely pressing the tilde key won't open romeshell for me on my computer so I can't toggle_fow to reveal the map and show mine and the AI's progress)

konny
01-24-2008, 12:43
It must not be the tilde. It is always the one next to the "1", what would be the "^" on a German keyboard for example.