As a very rare merceanry unit with very low spawning rates ?
Printable View
As a very rare merceanry unit with very low spawning rates ?
Go to the EB 2 forum, and man you are asking tons of questions today lol
Tibet really isn't on the map (maybe the edge), and it did not have a large population at the time.
Plus, EB doesn't add units just because they would be cool or such. Find some historical evidence that the Tibetans left Tibet and went west looking for jobs as military mercenaries, then find out how they fought. Do this and the EB team will make a Tibetan mercenary if they trump all other units that deserve faction slots.
Maybe Xiongnu mercnearies ?
Even less likely. There's the Yuezhi between the EB map and the Xiognu; and at the game's start both of these people do not even have any of their 'powerbases' close by. (The closest thing is the IIRC sort of vassal state represented by Sulek, which is subject to the Yuezhi: not the Xiognu.)
Will the EB team feature a dropping of the ban hammer tonight?
Tibetans, why not Proto-Turks? just because the Olympics is coming up, jump on the trendy-train? leave out even more important peoples (concerning world history)? :shifty:
I would be lying if I said that it hasn't been brought up.Quote:
Originally Posted by russia almighty
Pass it on that I will fire up the ovens for a special batch if it happens.
Cause, what we've been living on is a few months old stash. Thats right, they're still good, even if they're old.
It is the weekend of Great Flaming.
aye! everybody to the walls!
What about TIE-FIGHTERS fighting for Come honour face
(Say it out loud)
How about samurai warriors, or maybe Conan? He was the king of the barbarian kings and deservers his own slot. If your city hits 25000 you can recruit Conan and get control over aedui arverni and sweboz.
Can everybody stop to post fucking spam in every fucking thread or do you prefer the moderators to take some radical measures ?
You're always in such a pleasant mood, Spendios.
Though it is really annoying that every thread is filled with the same effin flaming pig and lorica segmentata jokes.
What I don't get is why blatant trolls like this one aren't locked on sight in this forum.:inquisitive:
because trolls tend to run away too quickly.
I don't know about you, but I found Gertrude hilarious. As mentioned in 'who do you like least' thread, Gertrude's a troll who's been trying to start flame wars on this forum for some time now. But he's so transparently incapable of doing it that we're just now taking his threads for joyrides.
About the LS jokes, better LS jokes than LS accusations, no? Being irreverent every now and then does keep tempers and tensions low. Or at least, that's my strategy. Sorry you don't like it. Come to the tavern and have a drink, maybe you'll like it after you're drunk. :)
yes pez. but there are times when it goes to far, like his multiple threads this week, 1/2 of which are now locked for indecent behavior..... so I propose this to be done to the threads that are flaming right now:
:dancinglock: :dancinglock: :dancinglock: :dancinglock:
Absolutely agree. It goes too far, but of course the more he loses his restraint the more pathetic he looks. But that's his business. I second the lock.
I go away to France for awhile, then I come back to this perphaps inept disruption of our beloved forum.
The title thread seems just so obscure.
The question I have is Gertrude sincere in his questions, and therefore perphaps a little abstract in his thoughts from the norm, or are some of these odd questions there as some kind of a laugh?
Perphaps you could answer Gertrude(there isn't some disgruntled ex EB member going under a false name is there?). No disrespect intended by the way!
Digby, this is like the 5th nonsense thread he's posted in the past week. He definitely isn't sincere in his questions. A quick study of threads in the second and third page started by Gertrude, and of the EB2 forums, will change your perceptions.
I doubt it, but there is an EB2 forum for that sort of question.
Discussion no longer needed. Closed.