Printable View
I know this is quite an old question I read a report the after day which was really interesting and I just wanted to know if you Orgers think that chocolate is really better than sex.
This poll is conducted on the assumption that all who do vote yes, have experience...those who haven't vote anyway!
I don't think anyone will say yes.
Ive eaten chocolate.
Thank goodness you cant tell which one I voted for Sarathos. Heh heh heh.
The right type of chocolate with the right additions can be better than sex.
Just like sex with a person that isn't quite proficient in the bedroom isn't as good as having a simple piece of chocolate.
Let's turn this thread into a discussion on favourite chocolate types. Dark chocolate with mint = 10/10 for me. However if the dark chocolate is over 75% pure cocoa, then it's bitterness overpowers my tastebuds. :grin:
Is chocolate really better than sex?
Hell no
----------------------------
My fave chocolate - Cadbury's Caramello = OH YEEAH
Dear god, NO!
Well I was wrong... someone said Yes...
Bet you it was Sarathos (no offence. not claiming knowledge of anything. this is a disclaimer towards this post and any others I may make in this thread)
It was me actually :sweatdrop:Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
As an expert in these matters, I can say with great certainty that sex is better then chocolate, but sex is also better with chocolate, and needless to say, chocolate is also much better with sex.
And with a bit of luck, chocolate increases chance of sex.
A simple statement will answer this question: You can have chocolate with sex, but you can't have sex with chocolate.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
:egypt:
Such weird statements are generally brought up by those who want to cover it up for themselves.
Yeah, for a work-aholic it could be claimed that chocolate would be better than sex, regarding the fact that most of the scientists could be considered as work-aholics.
I sometimes get amazed at the ability of people to astonishingly make up excuses for what they fail at.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
If chocolate was better than sex I'd be eating it all the time. And well though I tend to eat chocolate quite a lot, I'd choose sex (wel good sex with a woman).
Though I must admit I'd choose the chocolate if I had to have sex with a man, animal or some ugly whatever.
I was wondering when the end of your reasonings and examples would come, fortunately the full stop showed up, Moros. :smoking:
Can't say I'm too fond of chocolates. Bleurgh.
No! :laugh4: :wall:
Chocolate is a far far 2nd.
Chocolate if you are a poor research student with no hopes of finding a girl :shrug:
Never had sex, so I can't vote.
Amen to that.:yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
That's so funny! :brood:Quote:
Originally Posted by pevergreen
Good gods, no; it's even remotely close! I like chocolate well enough, but it doesn't hold a candle to sex. :laugh4:
Heh. Well said! ~:cheers:Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
I think you took the thoughts of everyone and put them into the word of law.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
Anyone who says yes hasn't had good sex...
:no:
I think I'm entitled to say yes then :beam:
never even had bad sex...
No. No. No. No. No. Chocolate doesn't even list in my top ten favorite things (and sex being amongst the first, if not right at the very top) :laugh4:
(Wait 'till you're married.)Quote:
Originally Posted by Elite Ferret
Care to explain?Quote:
Originally Posted by Beirut
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caius
No, I'll leave that little treat to you and your wife.