Merging Factions

With Kingdoms.exe it is possible to mod the merging of two Factions.

Like the Kalmar League in the Teutonic campaign. Will this be used in EBII?

Probably not, because that merged faction uses a faction slot. And I think the team wants to use all faction slots, except one for scripting purposes.

Would have been nice with the KH or a reunified AS.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by antisocialmunky

Would have been nice with the KH or a reunified AS.

---

So true, once EB II comes out Casse is going to die(and other BRitanic factions) and the Re-Unified Arche is going in. And maybe something nice for the KH :)

Britain is just so...useless as Makedonia and KH

The problem with this idea is more to do with the fact that it is practically useless. The only thing it changes is the banner; you cannot change the name or anything else to do with the faction. All other changes (such as building tree changes, unit changes) are done through event counters, which we are doing anyway.

Foot

So in effect, a merging faction is reform using up a faction slot.

That sucks!

Bummer, I actually like Casse a lot.

Yup so do I, even if they are virtually braindead.

Why doesn't Casse actively raid the European coasts?

You should ask that to THESE guys

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

This made me ROFL

Quote:

---

“Empire: Total War has exceeded all our expectations. It’s one of those rare “great works” that the team will remember with enormous pride for the rest of their lives, and the public will remember as one of the landmark games of the decade,” says Mike Simpson, Creative Director at The Creative Assembly, “Looking ahead, we’re excited about delivering more quality content to Empire via updates and downloadable content and we’re looking forward to taking the Total War franchise on to even greater heights”.

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by m046720

Why doesn't Casse actively raid the European coasts?

---

You should play using BI.exe. Then the AI conducts naval invasions.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by miotas

You should play using BI.exe. Then the AI conducts naval invasions.

---

But very few indeed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cartaphilus

But very few indeed.

---

Indeed, things will be better in EBII

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

Indeed, things will be better in EBII

---

Let us pray that it may be so. :yes:

Because they will obviously release a poorer version of EB1 and call it a day.

I have full faith in the team.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by A Very Super Market

Because they will obviously release a poorer version of EB1 and call it a day.

I have full faith in the team.

---

Prayer always helps, innit?

If you're religious. If not, maybe a palm fungus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by A Very Super Market

If you're religious. If not, maybe a palm fungus.

---

As Aemilius Paulus would do:

-palmface-

What, too soon?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Megas Methuselah

As Aemilius Paulus would do:

-palmface-

---

It's facepalm. And EB2 will have lots of naval invasions because the AI can be improved upon in M2TW.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by a completely inoffensive name

It's facepalm. And EB2 will have lots of naval invasions because the AI can be improved upon in M2TW.

---

The AI can be improved upon? Wuhuuuuuuu!!!!! No more Artificial insanity:juggle2::2thumbsup::2thumbsup::2thumbsup:

I just did a little research on this, and from what I can tell, there is absolutely NOTHING about merging factions that takes up a faction slot. Now, I'm not completely savvy with script syntax, but it appears to be nothing more than a simple script command to give over all assets of an existing faction to another.

The cosmetic faction banner/name switching appears to be a different script command, which does indeed take up a faction slot, but the two are not directly linked.

I'm not sure what good the turn over assets script would do, but for situations like the surrender of Ptolemaic Egypt to the Romans, or similar situations, it might still be handy.

On merging factions:

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=91080

On banner/faction name swapping:

https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showthread.php?t=90946

It would be great if that really is the case, the potential is great.

But how do you limit it? Sure, the Romans would surrender if Rome is captured (same goes for the Carthaginians and Carthage), but what about the AS, or the KH? And not giving them that function would be a huge advantage for those factions.

We are not using the merge factions thing to represent the collapse of an empire. We have something different for that.

Foot

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Foot

We are not using the merge factions thing to represent the collapse of an empire. We have something different for that.

Foot

---

I am excited.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Foot

We are not using the merge factions thing to represent the collapse of an empire. We have something different for that.

Foot

---

Oh EBII is going to be greater and better then I thought.:yes:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skullheadhq

You should ask that to THESE guys

Spoiler Alert, click show to read: 

This made me ROFL

---

I loled

I think the team is really doing it's best this time, I was positively surprised with EB1 already...
:beam:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by m046720

Bummer, I actually like Casse a lot.

---

As do I. I find them to be quite a charming bunch of wee bummers.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cartaphilus

But very few indeed.

---

Weeelll... In my last Romani game, Qarthadast started the war against me by landing an army near Capua, and later Makedon declared war on me by landing two (half-full) armies near Tarantum and blockading the port, and after a peace was negotiated (with FD after I annihilated their armies) they later returned and pulled another one, a landing near Tarantum and a blockade of the port(s).

All this within the initial 20 years.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Horatius Flaccus

It would be great if that really is the case, the potential is great.

But how do you limit it? Sure, the Romans would surrender if Rome is captured (same goes for the Carthaginians and Carthage), but what about the AS, or the KH? And not giving them that function would be a huge advantage for those factions.

---

Also a problem would be the ability by player to go for sneak decapitations, for example just loading up every fighting man in a ship and heading straight for the enemy's capital (before declaring war, of course). So much for challenge in that case.

Well, that's up to the player. If they want to ruin their game, be my guest.