-
1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Well, the upcoming naval balance changes were a hot topic on the forums since they were first announced by Jack Lusted. We have them now. Let's express what we observe (and how we feel about them). Here are my two cents from the first 2 campaign naval battles of the British (me) against France (AI).
1st Battle:
British: 1 5th rate, 2 6th rates
French: 2 brigs, 1 sloop, 1 galley, 1 indiaman
Outcome: British captured ALL French ships; none sunk
Notes:
1) On the battle open, it occurred that all my frigates display 400 range (for the round shot). This seemed to be the default range in the vanilla 1.3. So, either the display is wrong, or the "longer range" for frigates has not been implemented. Note that on the campaign map, unit cards for all ships display 400 range too... So, it just might be, CA has actually listened to the community.
2) The Chain Shot now has 500 range (versus the round-shot range of 400) versus the 400 range for the round shot and it is very (very!) dangerous. I switched to chain shot at the battle open and demasted the French sloop with the first salvo from my 5th rate. I did not switch to the round-shot throught the battle and the end outcome was, as mentioned above: all French ships captured... No "monster sloop" effect observed.
3) The left side of the targeting marker now is green, the right one is white. A nice touch.
4) The deployment rectangles now see to be more varied than before. I observed the french one being place diagonally relative to my British one.
2nd Battle:
British: 1 5th rate
French: 1 6th rate
Outcome: British captured the 6th rate
Notes:
Same thing as above. The battle was decided in the first 2 minutes by the first British chain-shot salvo that demasted the French 6th rate (Frigate).
Bottom line: I do not see the dreaded "monster sloop" effect implemented. On a different token: beware the CHAIN SHOT!... Maybe it's a tad overpowered now. Otherwise, I feel positive by the changes CA has made. What seems to emerge though is the AI's inability to cope with the changes. In my experience, the AI was just a sitting duck for my chain-shot salvos still trying to hit me with out-of-range round shots...
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
This reinforces my hopes to patch 1.4 as I wait to download it. I knew that before the patch, the sloops wouldn't be able to TERRORIZE the sea, they would be able to be slightly more useful than they are now. A bigger ship will still easily take them down, unless you happened to have a master admiral against you.
The chain shot is slightly puzzling, but I think it was underpowered before and half of my trade fleets in my other game were captured ships. Poor french can't build anything but indiamen, so they decided to capture a few dozen galleons from the pirates instead:laugh4:
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
But the ships you took to battle were adjusted to be sloop/brig killers. So exactly as expected. SoL versus sloop is where it will get interesting.
Mind you, I don't expect the AI to know how to get the most out of theirs sloops in any case so for a practical purpose I don't expect to see all that much difference against a proper SoL.
But the principle of the thing still annoys me, regardless of how it ends up playing. To me it just seems so obvious that a greater fidelity to how things worked back then will automatically provide better balance.
Oh well... thank heavens for the modders, who can atleast in part undo the worst excess of this unimaginative C&C balancing.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Try Sloop versus 1st Rate.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
A1_Unit
Try Sloop versus 1st Rate.
My highest SOL so far (1712) is a 4th rate. So, tell me, what happens when you face a sloop with a 1st rate?
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Well I should be going to sleep right now but I'm gonna go find out!
EDIT:well I was right. The SOL (2nd rate) didn't lose a single cannon. One broadside took out the first mast of a sloop(or brig, I'm not sure). A few more broadsides and the other was down.
Maybe if you had like 100 sloops, it'll be a fair fight. Until then, One or two broadsides and the sloop is out of the picture. A few cannonballs isn't gonna do anything anyway if you have a huge SOL vs SOL fight.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
unless that stray cannonball hits your gunpowder stocks ;)
actually onto those that know, did they ever actually really use explosive shot in naval battles at all? or was that sort of thing just too dangerous to leave lying around on the ships?
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Another note: Ships don't seem to want to do stuff if you just right click other ships. They ust kinda go straight forward as if they were going to ram, but stop 30 or so feet away.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
I fought a 12 brig Maratha fleet with my 6 3rd rate fleet and pulverised them (though one of my SoLs was taking some water at the end).
What I noticed was a slight loss in FPS when I accelerated the time - this didn't happen before. I'll test more.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Well I just did 2 custom battles 1 * 1st rate vs 10 * sloop.
First one my 1st rate routed after being set on fire by a brig that got too close & exploded, was like 3.5 sloops down at that point after about as many broadsides.
2nd battle = 3 exploded sloops, 4 sunk, 1 surrendered & 2 routed with very heavy damage, minimal damage to the first rate.
Each broadside caused the target sloop to at least waver.
The first broadside actually got cut short about half way through when that sloop exploded.
The 3rd or fourth half broadside caused the 2nd exploding sloop.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
I have also seen that the fire power values have been changed. Sloops guns are now not as strong as before though they have 70% accuracy, as do brigs.
Smaller ships have a 100 m/yrd advantage over the SOLs but I think that is only with chain shot.
While it is a step away from realism it does not seem to have a huge effect on how it plays out from the previous setup.
-
1 Attachment(s)
Chain Shots...
I suspect, chain-shots will be nerfed in the next patch so enjoy them while they're as they are in 1.4. See the attachment: that's the outcome of an encounter between my (British) frigate and a pirate fleet consisting of 2 Galleons, 1 Flyte and 1 Brig. The end result: all 4 Pirate ships demasted and captured with barely a small scratch on the Frigate. The outcome might have been quite different if the pirates used chain on me though.
By the way, I noticed that the crews fire their muskets if the enemy ships is within range. I like that touch. Was this present before 1.4?
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
peacemaker
Another note: Ships don't seem to want to do stuff if you just right click other ships. They ust kinda go straight forward as if they were going to ram, but stop 30 or so feet away.
I've never found it to work myself, whenever I've ordered my ship to attack an enemy ship (with a broadside facing the ship itself) its decided to turn away from the enemy ship and seems to want to go in a large circle just to get the other side to do a half hearted salvo at the enemy ship. auto targeting works much better and means I just have to orchestrate my navy
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
What really irks me (and was irking even before 1.4) is that square rigged vessels (any sail vessels actually) such as Galleons can ride against the wind like motorboats even after I have taken down 70% of their sails (and masts). Thank goodness for Darthmod. It gets rid of this nonsense.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
There have been other changes. When a blockaded fleet attacks the blockade, if you are blockading then you can not retreat and if you run out the clock the enemy ships loose 5 guns and come at you again, and again, and again.
I had a sloop on blockade and some how the Spanish managed to build a galleon in the port. (a bug?) anyway after running away about 4 times I dismasted it and shelled it until is struck, so yes the small ships do pose a threat to the big ones.
It is not that I never managed to do that prior to 1.4, it is just a lot easier with the longer range of the small ships and the improved chain shot.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Fisherking
There have been other changes. When a blockaded fleet attacks the blockade, if you are blockading then you can not retreat and if you run out the clock the enemy ships loose 5 guns and come at you again, and again, and again.
I had a sloop on blockade and some how the Spanish managed to build a galleon in the port. (a bug?) anyway after running away about 4 times I dismasted it and shelled it until is struck, so yes the small ships do pose a threat to the big ones.
It is not that I never managed to do that prior to 1.4, it is just a lot easier with the longer range of the small ships and the improved chain shot.
That bold part: I think, it was present also in 1.3. I was never able to retreat if I got attacked while blockading a port.
As to the small ships: are you sure they have a longer range? All my ships (frigates, sloops, brigs, Indiamen) display the same range for round shots in battle: 400. It's the chain shot (for all my ships), which has gotten a longer range now (500).
As to the chainshot, I definitely have a strong feeling it will be nerfed soon. I just had a battle of 1 sloop versus 4 brigs (all healthy) and I demasted them all without a scratch on my sloop...
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Chain shot has more range than round shot? That sounds backwards.
I do find it interesting that the mostly positive reviews of 1.4 naval seem to amount to "good, CA did not really change much." Given that people did not seem to want this "balancing" in the first place, why implement it all?
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
well I suppose they felt they wanted to change to something they desired more, maybe they have more fun fighting each other when theyre off the clock? I get the feeling that the chain shot range probably is a bug, I wouldn't have thought chainshot would fly further than round shot, but thats why I probably haven't noticed a change because I haven't tried firing chain shot at the enemy since i first started playing the game
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NimitsTexan
Chain shot has more range than round shot? That sounds backwards.
It is backwards, just from air friction. As for not changing much, dismasting with two broadsides is a huge change. The French would have devastated the British navy since their doctrine was to give up the weather gauge and fire high, letting them withdraw if they wished.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
On the other hand, steam frigates (and galleys) now actually have a purpose. Maybe that was the point of the change?
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
I one-shoted an Xbec with a sloop in 1.3... though I haven't done any naval batles in 1.4 yet.:yes:
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Just did a little test.
Four galleys and a steam frigate vs. a heavy 1st rate. 1st rate was demasted and surrendered after five minutes. I lost one galley which exploded after a volley, and the steam frigate took moderate damage.
I tried this in 1.3 a few times and always, always, lost by a heavy margin, even when I cheated by boarding the 1st rate and blasting it while it was stuck in place.
EDIT:
Actually, the 1.3 tests had MORE galleys. 8, I think.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Just be brave... In 1.4 you CAN demast that 1st rate with a sloop. Go around it, and blast from behind until it surrenders.
:wall:
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slaists
Just be brave... In 1.4 you CAN demast that 1st rate with a sloop. Go around it, and blast from behind until it surrenders.
You could do that in 1.3, it's just a lot easier now.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Hermann the Lombard
You could do that in 1.3, it's just a lot easier now.
It was always possible. It was just extremely difficult to achieve. The equal ranges and the disparity in fire power along with the slight damage that chain shot did made it something of an unlikely outcome.
The fire powered difference now is even greater but chain shot is very much more effective and has a greater range. The accuracy of the small vessels is also much improved.
It doesn’t mean that it is not a difficult feat to achieve still, it is just a bit easier than it actually should be. I still would not want to take a single sloop against something of the SOL class and I would not try it vs. a 74, it is just with the slower ships you have an improved chance.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slaists
What really irks me (and was irking even before 1.4) is that square rigged vessels (any sail vessels actually) such as Galleons can ride against the wind like motorboats even after I have taken down 70% of their sails (and masts). Thank goodness for Darthmod. It gets rid of this nonsense.
Let me guess: You're playing on Hard or Very Hard battle difficulty. I've never seen this behavior in Normal difficulty.
If you aren't playing Hard/Very-Hard, ignore the below.
I, too, have a pet peeve about stuff I've seen as a result of the game. More than once I've seen someone talk about something wierd (like a sloop boarding their 4th rate and winning), only to find out that they're playing hard or very-hard. It's like they want the "prestige" of saying they play on the harder difficulty levels (as if "Normal" was wimping out or something), but they don't want the AI to get certain advantages (like in melee combat, which lets a sloop capturing a 4th rate). The game gives *huge* advantages to the AI in hard/very hard, not just in firepower or morale, but in little details like reload speed for line infantry, or the ability for square-rigged vessels to sail up-wind at a reasonable rate (which does make the AI *harder* to fight <G>). Do *not* assume that anything you see in very-hard is "normal", or anything other than a cheat to help the AI be harder to fight.
Ok, rant over. Sorry, Slaists, you just triggered my rant, it wasn't directed or intended at you.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hoof
Let me guess: You're playing on Hard or Very Hard battle difficulty. I've never seen this behavior in Normal difficulty.
If you aren't playing Hard/Very-Hard, ignore the below.
I, too, have a pet peeve about stuff I've seen as a result of the game. More than once I've seen someone talk about something wierd (like a sloop boarding their 4th rate and winning), only to find out that they're playing hard or very-hard. It's like they want the "prestige" of saying they play on the harder difficulty levels (as if "Normal" was wimping out or something), but they don't want the AI to get certain advantages (like in melee combat, which lets a sloop capturing a 4th rate). The game gives *huge* advantages to the AI in hard/very hard, not just in firepower or morale, but in little details like reload speed for line infantry, or the ability for square-rigged vessels to sail up-wind at a reasonable rate (which does make the AI *harder* to fight <G>). Do *not* assume that anything you see in very-hard is "normal", or anything other than a cheat to help the AI be harder to fight.
Ok, rant over. Sorry, Slaists, you just triggered my rant, it wasn't directed or intended at you.
Nope, my battle difficulty is on normal.
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Slaists
Nope, my battle difficulty is on normal.
Then my rant doesn't apply to you :)
Strange though about what you're seeing. Maybe they're going not straight into the wind but at an angle? Those triangular sails should allow them to tack at an angle at a not-to-unreasonable speed. Think about it, if square-riggers couldn't make headway against a wind somehow, they wouldn't have been much use!
It'd be nice if we actually saw tacking when going up-wind, but that would screw up the firing patterns for the player.
The challenge when tacking a real ship is to get enough momentum going so that when you haul it over through the direct-headwind point, you have enough residual speed so the rudder can turn you to the right angle in the other direction. That requires a fair bit of speed, especially for ships that don't go all that fast with a favorable wind to begin with.
I read a bit up on sailing after ETW came out and found it's quite a fascinating art/science!
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
I've always used chain-shot often (but still selectively) during naval battles.
I've also noticed the 1.4 AI is also using chain-shot far more often.
Under 1.4, the effectiveness of chain has jumped so much so that I've noticed the amount of damage formerly done by a full broadside chain-shot rake is almost as likely from a full broadside chain-shot flank hit.
Also, in the 5-6 battles I've fought so far, masts have been 'halved' rather than felled completely more often. It looks funny thereafterwards with other ships firing chain-shot harmlessly over the newly shortened masts...
I haven't used grape yet so I wonder if there are any surprises there...
Cheers,
Dreadnought1
-
Re: 1.4 Naval Balance Observations
Quote:
Originally Posted by
hoof
Then my rant doesn't apply to you :)
Strange though about what you're seeing. Maybe they're going not straight into the wind but at an angle? Those triangular sails should allow them to tack at an angle at a not-to-unreasonable speed. Think about it, if square-riggers couldn't make headway against a wind somehow, they wouldn't have been much use!
It'd be nice if we actually saw tacking when going up-wind, but that would screw up the firing patterns for the player.
The challenge when tacking a real ship is to get enough momentum going so that when you haul it over through the direct-headwind point, you have enough residual speed so the rudder can turn you to the right angle in the other direction. That requires a fair bit of speed, especially for ships that don't go all that fast with a favorable wind to begin with.
I read a bit up on sailing after ETW came out and found it's quite a fascinating art/science!
If only they (the ships) were tacking in ETW... And, nope, the case I talked about was not at an angle but directly AGAINST the wind. How do I know? Because I was going directly against the wind and the AI was racing behind me :laugh4: Anyway, CA acknowledged that their ships CAN sail against the wind. Their argument for putting that 'feature' in was that otherwise naval battles would be too long and boring...