Longcat

Well, no... I won't post the longcat here :laugh4: but I want to ask about the maximum picture size limit omitted in this forum.... and a suggestion: well, maybe we should start limiting the size of pics that can be posted here, because some "creatively naughty" half-trolls could start to made this nice forum a mess....

Umm, yeah, thanks Cute Wolf. I will take a note of that the next time I feel ready for a 'vacation' ~:thumb: :yes:


Tehehehe - outsourcing the necessary prerequisite research vital to my mischief-causing dalliances is quite pleasurable if I may say so.

Wow, way to correct a problem which doesn't actually exist.

Actually I ask about that because I've made a pic special for my "full of meme" AAR..... well.... maybe I shouldn't doing it, but still ccurious about the pic size limit permitted.

The way you phrase your posts sounds as if there trolls everywhere, spamming image macros, or that such an event is just around the corner. The only one I can remember being used was the "ROFL MAO" pic in the backroom, but that was amazingly relevant.

No... I means I wonder if it will be counted as posting "longcat image" (which some forum will get you an infraction point when you post too long image), if I post my "welded" picture of the epic Saka vs Ptolemy battle (well, to be precise... 640 x 12455 pixel)

If it's relevant, and in an AAR (And therefore your own work [Although that hasn't stopped interference before]), then there shouldn't be a problem. Just don't hotlink it.

Beirut had a rule of thumb for the Frontroom back in the day. If the posted pic was wider than 800 pixels (IIRC), it should go into spoiler tags to keep the forum look intact. I think this was under the assumption that most people at the time had at least a 1024 pixel wide display.

Yeah, spoiler tags are probably a good idea

Hoo, thanks :2thumbsup:

If the filesize is high or if there is going to be a lot of pictures, put a 56k warning in the thread title, or ask a moderator to add it in.