Who would you vote for if the election was tomorrow?
Printable View
Who would you vote for if the election was tomorrow?
This poll most definitely needs a Gah! option.
Bachmann seems like quite a well-balanced and level-headed individual.
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v..._feet_1_vw.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Rhyfylwyr
Bachmann can be the Gah! option.Quote:
Originally Posted by drone
I'd go for Huntsman I think.
Where's Johnson?
:angry:
CR
If Bachmann ever get's close to the presidency I'll start bothering my counterparts in Australia/New Zealand to find me a position there. :stare:
Boris Johnson? He's not eligible.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
I voted Palin.
romney stupid poll. putting obama on the poll is a total outlier number until post republican primaries.
Indeed.Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
Of the choices listed, it's between Pawlenty and Huntsman for me. I'll go with Huntsman for now, as - along with a strong record - he seems to have an unusual amount of integrity for a politician. He's also leaving himself options to actually govern based on circumstances and not ideological absolutism.
If I was an American citizen I´d vote for Obama...
if forced to select a republican candidate...Gary Johnson
Elmer Fudd.
Elmer Fudd's speech is frequently slurred,which is proof that he is an alcoholic. He would be ripped apart in the primaries, unless he could prove that the speech slurring was due to a handicap, at which point it would become a huge asset to his campaign as we have not had a legitimately handicapped president since Bill Clinton.
if it's due to a war wound he could really become a contender.Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
and Clinton was not handicapped....he was horny i.e. he was a guy.
Don't they all play golf?Quote:
Originally Posted by Major Robert Dump
I want to vote Scrooge McDuck for President...
alas... the closest thing is Palin...
Looks like Obama wins.
that's kinda insulting.....Scoodge McDuck is a crafty businessduck.....don´t be comparing him to that loon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cute Wolf
Where's Justus Aardvark?
AII
11 vs 11 by my count. Obama will most likely win this next election pretty easily, but there is some time to go. Let's see what a default does to the economy over the next year and a half.
Who was the black nutjob that prohibition of Islam should be allowed as the states may will it ?
Edit: I see it was about mosques, not Islam and the nutjob was named Herman Cain.
Am I wrong to remember another Cain who was a Republican ?
yes you are wrong to remember.Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftEyeNine
Obama since he more or less saved the Midwest and for the lack of a better candidate.
I'm curious,Quote:
Originally Posted by TuffStuffMcGruff
it almost sound likeyou consider that a good thing. Crippling a country to bring down your opponent usually involve a good plan to fix things afterwards, if you plan stay in power.
Who cares. This is life, let's let things get interesting. We still have basic levels of education here, still have infrastructure. Most of us speak the same language and have levels of geographic isolation from threats. Fertile landscapes for food production etc. A default may require a major social restructuring,but who says that we don't need that and wouldn't benefit long term. Sometimes the status quo needs to be shattered when people have run out of ideas. Personally, I prefer a moderate approach, but that doesn't seem like an option here. This isn't a popularity contest like an election. I'm not sure that the president has ever faced a situation like this.
How about a McCain ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Centurion1
McCain and Cain are radically different. And by radically different I mean differing on the scale that Japan and India are a similar parallel with Asia being the common factor.Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftEyeNine
Still 12 to 12. Let's see how these numbers hold up if Obama and the Democrats and the republicans allows us to default.
Three people actually want Sarah Palin to be president? :stare: