Printable View
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...googlenews_wsj
What says the peanut gallery?
Perhaps we have a few in the Paul camp whom beilive this whole government thing has gone to far and the wreckage should be left to the state, or even the marketplace to decide.
I mean destroyed towns are probably good tourist attractions
Continually my government seems to find the way to fight the absolute most immetrial battles under the guise of what they actually should be doing
Well you can never have enough guvmint FEMA cards obtained through fake social security numbers, I still have a few left over from Katrina that I use at the liquor store. Hopefully they put all those fany pants new englanders into nice hotels like they do when a wild fire rips through a really nice california neighborhood.
Hey I know, maybe states that live in crappy locations can pay for themselves they seem to get hit so much more frequently and suck up federal funds. I don't recall so many natural disasters in Idaho or Utah, but all these places that charge $14 for a cup of coffee or have lots of Cubans seem to really suck the tit, they kind of deserve to get hurricaned for having such high prices. Now states do it for crap like droughts and bad groundhog day results.
Golly, how did we ever survive without FEMA, or were there just never any droughts or tornadoes or hurricanes before like this century????
There was less to be destroyed. And people didn't care about it so much either.
Maybe all humans should be transferred to a mega-city in Denmark or something. Then it would be much less of a problem.Quote:
maybe states that live in crappy locations can pay for themselves