Book about Byzantium in 7th cent.

Perusing thru my uni library I came across a book about Byzantium's 7th cent. Best thing about it was Heraclius' Persian campaigns.

Anyone reading it will not believe how such a general could be omitted from the ranks of some of the best generals in history. Granted I am biased, but justified.
Stupidity on the part of military "experts" who omit Heraclius because of the Arabs commit the cardinal sin of associating one relevant event to the other. What did the Muslim Arabs have to the war? Nothing in the duration of war but after it. It is the duration of the war that is the focus not after it.

This is my late night rant. I hope I will finish it when my eyesight blurs out in tiredness.

Author:
A.N. Strathos

Byzantium in the Seventh Century Book I 602-634

Heraclius tidbits:

Surrounded by 3 armies in the mountainous Zagros range and defeated all armies to extricate itself- only Hannnibal, Caesar and Alexander could do that - why not Heraclius who did?

Heraclius campaigned deep in Persia while maintaing long lines of communication against Persian armies still loose. eg. Army of Shahbaraz, he who conquered Cilicia, Syria, Roman Palestina, Armenia, Mesopotamia and Egypt.

Led from the front at all times especially in Mard U Mard (one on one combat before commencement of fighting)

Drove deep into Persian hearlland and chase Chosroe like a piggy tailed school being chased by the big bad wolf. Burnt the fellas seasonal capital Dastagard.

:help: :hide: :charge: :duel: :whip: :sweatdrop: ~:joker:

Interesting info Kataphraktoi. I knew that Heraklius was a good general but don't really know much about the battles he fought. It would be nice if you found the time to post some extracts of the book. Thanks anyway! :2thumbsup:

Pg. 155

The Persians were surprised by the invasion and particularly by the speed of the advance. Chosroes as we have already pointed out, did not envisage the Byzantines invading Persia. In June he decided to recall Shahbaraz. But it was four months between the decision being made and Shahbaraz's arrival...........

Chosroes picked 40,000 men in haste and placed himself at their head, occupied position in Atropatene Media (Azerbaijan and North western Iran) from which to defend it. Heraclius crossed the Araxes, probably close to the town of Jolfa and entered the "Land of Fire', where there were many Fire Altars. He advanced burning the towns and villages.....

He marched straight on to the town of Ganzac...Shortly before it he encountered the Persian advance guard which he dispersed, killing the general in command of it. His lightning advance was irresistible.

The news of the size of the Byzantine army and dispersal of the Persian vanguard terrified Chosroes, who abandoned his army and took flight. When the Emperor had dispersed the Persian army, he entered Ganzac, a large and rich city, capital of Atropatene Media where he rested his army. He was informed Chosroes had feld to Therbaimes burning all crops and pasture of the district to hinder feeding the BYzantine troops. This was the usual Persian tactic when their enemies were advancing through the plain. He was also told that there was a great Fire Temple......Therbaimes was captured and set on fire together with the Temple..........

The pursuit of Chosroes was merciless and lasted a considerable time. At one moment they cut him off in the mountainous regions of South Media, but he finally succeeded in escaping towards Mesopotamia where he mustered a new Persian army and awaited Shahbaraz's arrival. There is very little information extant about this chase. Only the eastern chroniclers say that Ecbatana was captured.............

Next time, I'll type out the part about the three armies.

Hey kataphraktoi long time no see! ~:wave:

Great articles, can't wait for the upcoming one, keep up the good work! ~:)

Thanks a lot Kataphraktoi! ~:cheers:
Can't wait for more...whenever you find time, of course!

Hey Faisal!! Long time no see either.

p159 - 163

Chosroes realising the peril, mustered three armies to face the Byzantine onslaught.

One of these was commanded by Shahbaraz, another by Sahin, while the third consisting of raw recruits was on this account supplemented of crack troops bearing names of Persian Kings, the Chosroygetes and the Perozites. Sarahblangas (the royal leopard) a very active and conceited general, was put in command.

Sarahblangas occupied a line stretching from the eastern shore of Lake Sevan to the Phaitakaran frontier, to be in a position to prevent the Byzantine invading Azerbaijan. He was hoping to ambush them.

When the mountain passes began to open up, Heraclius determined to start operations and it was then that he realised how unwise he had been to shut himself up in Albania (Chechyna area).

It was hard for him to descend on the eastern side of Phaitarakan, where the passes, while it was still harder to come down the western shore of Lake Sevan and by way of Armenia.

A huge mass of plateau, like a mountain island, stretches from the Caucasus foothills to the extensive plain in Mesopotamia. These plateaux are at different levels and intersected by very deep gorges, through which run-winding rivers full of rushing water. There are numerous side streams and even more torrents. Volcanic cones rise above the plateaux, the largest of which is Ararat, more than 5000 metres high......

Armenia has seldom being conquered by an enemy coming from the North, while almost every attempt to do so from the South has failed.

But this direction, too, was beginning to be ruled out for Heraclius by Shahbaraz approaching along the western shores of Lake Sevan.

Heraclius who had been reinforced by the allies and Lazi, Abasgi and Iberian mercenaries, fully apreciated the situation and marched south-east in an attempt to outflank Sarahblangas and capture the central road leading to Siounia.

Sarahblangas thought that the Byzantines were marching against Sahin's army and tried to overtake him through the mountain passes. But he became involved in the trackless passes and had to slow down his march.
Meanwhile Heraclius was in difficulties, because his allies refused to follow him to Azerbaijan. This resulted in the Byzantines losing valuable time while another Persian army was arriving.

Shahbaraz, obeying Chosroes' instant orders, after crossing the provinces of Ararat and Uti, reached the scene of operations. Thus he appeared behind the Byzantines while Sarahblangas was approaching on their flank.

Heraclius then thought that the only solution was to attack Sarahblangas whiose troops were tired after their exhausting journey. But Sarahblangas refused to fight, awaiting the arrical of the other two Persian armies.
Heraclius attacked them day and night and weakened the Persian morale. The Persians slowed down their march which enabled Heraclius to outflank them. He thus succeeded in infiltrating between the two armies.
He now was informed a third army under Sahin was drawing near.....

The Persians then marched against the Byzantines and Heraclius succeeded in drawing them onto a field of battle chosen by himself, which ended in a Byzantine victory during which Sarahblangas was wounded.

Towards the end of the fight, Sahin arrived and encamped ar the town of Tigranokert, near the present Tarnaout to the rear of the Byzantines. Heraclius immediately made a fierce onslaught on Sahin's army. This army which was small, suffered heavy losses. The Persians' camp and equipment...fell into Byzantine hands.....

Shahbaraz gathered together the remnants of both Sahin and Sarahblangas' armies and contemplated a fresh attack.....

By following the inner roads, Shahbaraz succeeded in forestalling Heraclius in this region. He spread his troops over the area of Aliovid, while he and 6000 picked horsemen stopped at Arces where they laid an ambush for Heraclius. Arces was a stronghold...

The Emperor heard of the ambush and selecting 20000 soldiers marched along the Patnos-Arces road against Shahbaraz. The Byzantine vanguard reached the village of Ali or Salvani....

There at three in the morning, the took the Persian guard by surprise and killed all but one man who rushed to inform Shahbaraz. The latter woke up and became angry as he did not believe the news and ordered the bearer to be put in irons. Meanwhile the Byzantines rushed headlong to attack the town. Shahbaraz then arose and "mounted his horse naked and barefoot" and made haste his escape.

The Persians put up a heroic resistance and fought fanatically from the roors of theirt houses, onto which they had climbed. Heralcius set the town on fire. Many were killed while others were either burnt alive or surrendered....

Shahbaraz's harem was also taken prisoner by the ByZAntines. Surprise was complete......

The surprise and semi-destruction of the Persian forces took place at the end of November and beginning of December, 625.

He seems to have been vary capable of choosing his battleground and forcing his enemies to fight there. He seems to have been good in laying ambushes too. What really surprises me, however, is the fact that he seems to have had a very good network of scouts and spies to inform him about enemy movement. I get this impression because he always knew where his enemies were approaching from and he even found out about the ambush!

Warren Treadgold had exactly the same impression about Heraclius' knowledge of Persian terrain unlike other past Roman attempts in Media Atropatene (Azerbaijan).

Could be because of the Caucasian element in his army.

The one thing difficult to ascertain is his lines of supply and communication.

next excerpt will be the siege of constantinople, its a long chapter so I have to abridge it and do in parts.

after that, the battle of nineveh and the sack of the Sassanid capital Dastagerd.

sweet thread. I'm reading A Concise History of Byzantium right now - gives good overall information but nothing lilke this - keep it up.

Siege of Constantinople pt 1

The concerted attack of the forces of East and West (Persian and Avar - Slavs) on Byzanitum is one of the noblest episodes of history during this period. Constantinople, closely besieged, was in immediate peril. The Khan of Khans, the Avar ruler, was at the head of his army during the whole siege. Heraclius did not consider his own presence wise, in order to avoid being shut into the City......

Heraclius reached Sebastea at the end of April with trememdnous problems to face and grace decisions to make. He wa aware of the Perso-Avar alliance and of the onslaught in preparation against the capital, which indeed was why he had returned at thye earliest opportunity to his base.

Here he would be able to glean the latest news from Constantinople. He had sent the patrician Anastasius to the Khagan as an emissary with a new offer on condition that he gave up his plans......

When Anastasius set out on his embassym he knew the city's weakness. He did not know what reinforcements had been sent there and of the orders given to strengthen the walls. He must thus have left the city in March or April 626.

Until he obtained the necessary information and decided on further action, his care was the defence of the city. He sent off a strng section of his army from Trebizond by sea to reinforce the city garrison.....

In addition to reinforcements, the Emperor sent orders and instructions for the defence, commnading the fleet be made ready for action. Its principal task would be to prevent the Persian army crossing over from Asia into Europe. He ordered immediate repair of the walls which seem not to have been in good condition.

A book about Vasile IInd anyone?

http://coursesa.matrix.msu.edu/~fish...readgold1.html

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Colovion

sweet thread. I'm reading A Concise History of Byzantium right now - gives good overall information but nothing lilke this - keep it up.

---

Aye. That book has been at my side for nearly six months.

'Bout time I bought Treadgold's earlier work...

http://www.deremilitari.org/RESOURCE...inewarfare.htm

I have always been a big fan of Heraclius Heraclius, he has always been one of the best of any era. And his Grandson, Constants II, and his son where all very good emperors.

I see you have been reading Warren Treadgold. Very nice.

He has some compelling arguements in some of his writings. And i have always enjoyed his research.

fenir

I've always enjoyed his work, if only because he doesn't share Gibbon's view on the Empire.