Has anyone else noticed the stone wall gates not producing any oil Post-Patch 1.2? I'm not sure about large walls and epic walls: haven't had any attacks on those.
Printable View
Has anyone else noticed the stone wall gates not producing any oil Post-Patch 1.2? I'm not sure about large walls and epic walls: haven't had any attacks on those.
I've noticed that in 1.2 it's much easier to capture the gate house than it was pre-patch. Pre-patch to capture the gate house I had to take 2 units threw both sides of it to the ground, post-patch I ran threw one side and it said I had taken it.
Will the oil drop if friendlies are nearby? If you were guarding the gate, the FF fix might prevent oil from dropping.
I think I've only had one battle ever where I was defending after a ram broke the gate and it wasn't in 1.2.
The oil is there, and the pathfinding is anything but better... (lost several hundred men trying to get them to run up that gatehouse...)
The way I noticed it was sending a unit of hoplites through the gate opened by my spy in Corinth. From my experience before the patch, I was counting on losing about half the unit, but I lost just a couple guys to the arrows; no oil... Maybe it had to do with the spy opening the gate. Before the patch, even in this case, the gates would pour oil.
Well it would make some sense that the spy would make certain that the oil was ruined somehow. Spilling it or something should be possible if you are able to bash open the gates.
Hmm... Nice notice. I can't find any oil either. Then again, I never assault a stone-walled city without a ton of spies or a ton of onagers to break down/disable everything I could. How sad spies couldn't shut down those nasty towers...
May be it's the new spy feature, I guess.
Expert Please. ~D
Funny, I always managed to capture it by sending one unit through at the top ~:handball:Quote:
Pre-patch to capture the gate house I had to take 2 units threw both sides of it to the ground
Well, why didn't you mention the spy in the first post? :dizzy2: This is a an actual gameplay enhancement, not a bug. We discussed this quite a bit, how having a spy didn't stop the oil, so as a result sapping or other techniques were preferable to the open gate. Nice to see that CA fixed it. ~:cool: They really should have bragged more about these enhancements in the readme...opportunity missed.
The spy disabling oil that was one I suggested that got in at the end.. :)
Hey Red Harvest, managed to get any more info on the VnV's, esp on the stuff that you suggested over at TWcenter, i.e. auto calc?
I personally think it would be really hard for the spy to disable the oil, it would be dropped by troops and spies were not shock troops. Plus how do you ruin the oil? Spill it all when the gaurds are not looking? Hell it would work well with boiling water, just not as well.
But I do not feel strongly about this, I always use siege towers and the AI rarely uses spies.
Glad you got that one in!Quote:
Originally Posted by Jambo
I haven't played with VnV's today. I got caught up in making flaming javelins (like the Spanish used) after someone asked, and in the same time disabling flaming arrows, LOL. I was trying a few other unit mods as well, but those didn't pan out--can't fix those blasted elephant archers. All my campaign map time has been testing the massive adjustments I am doing to the campaign to get the AI to make better units. I have only modified about half the regions so far...and none of the build queue.
Are you sure he didn't just stick a few holes in their buckets?? ~;)Quote:
Originally Posted by Uesugi Kenshin
BY your theory then, why don't the troops just simply close the pre-opened gates?! ~:confused:Quote:
Originally Posted by Uesugi Kenshin
The way I always imagined it was the spy opening the gates signalled an assault that was catching the defenders unaware (after all it is subterfuge). In this case is easily feasible that the spy would also be able to disable the oil. As to "ruining" oil - use you imagination - he could spill it, hide it or simply light it up in the place it's kept. ~;)
Regardless of the rights and wrongs however, from the perspective of the AI it's absolutely essential that the oil is disabled when a spy has pre-opened the gates. Under these sitautions the AI troops simply drop their siege equipment and charge headlong through the open gate(s). With the oil in place it's plain suicide and they'd be better of using their siege equipment (in many ways they'd still be better using both). As a result, what you found then was that spies were actually detrimental to AI assaults.
Yes, the spy getting the gates opened has many historical precedents. The spy recruits others within a settlement who for political, financial, or self preservation reasons secure the gatehouse. The odd part is still that all gates are open, but we won't go there...
And even if the men at the pots were not somehow disabled, they would not be prepared for the assault, so at best it would take them time to stoke the fires, heat the oil, and be ready to pour. They would not have sufficient time when the gates were *already open*.
I agree that it is not done very realistically and as I said it is not really an issue with me. I just happen to always voice the other side of this issue. After stone walls I never see any force get a ram to the gate and never use the gate when a spy opens it in a stone wall, I like using siege towers. But now that oil gets disabled it would be more practical for me to use the gates as the Greeks. Recrtuiting townsmen to hold the gate sounds likely, maybe it shouldn be that troops can fight in the gatehouse and you get a small unit to hold it with and unprepared enemies?
Probably would be hard to do though...