Pilum

Do any of you gyus know when or why Romans abandoned the use of pilum?
Im asking because i cant understand why so good close support weapon did
not survive to Medieval Ages.

Sometime during the 200s A.D

The thing is, the Pilum is expensive to manufacture, the shaft difficult to temper and the slots for the dowels hard to machine in.

Thanks for the info DemoArchangel ~:cheers:
I havent thought of the cost before.
Apart from that if one could have created an army combined from legionary infantry and Medieval Heavy cavalry,i think it could have been force to be reckoned,even in medieval times.I think?

Several new types of missile appeared, some of which evolved from the pilum (such as the later angon). The plumbata is pretty well known, and was claimed to have amazing range. On surviving examples, the lead weight was cast directly onto the joint between the iron and the wood. See the Fectio site for pictures of modern reconstructions: http://www.fectio.org.uk

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Templar Knight

Several new types of missile appeared, some of which evolved from the pilum (such as the later angon). The plumbata is pretty well known, and was claimed to have amazing range. On surviving examples, the lead weight was cast directly onto the joint between the iron and the wood. See the Fectio site for pictures of modern reconstructions: http://www.fectio.org.uk

---

Thanks fascinating information Sir Templar ~:cheers:

The article about plumbata is very intresting,especially it was used untill 7th century ad.
It says that soldier usually had 5 of these buggers with him.That indicates that an late Roman infantry cohort must have had an enermous firepower of "javelins".
Could it be possible that after Roman Empire crumbled the use of this kind of weapons ended because Frankish and Gothik armies didnt have enough drill and dicipline to use them to same effect as Romans.

Quote:

---

Could it be possible that after Roman Empire crumbled the use of this kind of weapons ended because Frankish and Gothik armies didnt have enough drill and dicipline to use them to same effect as Romans.

---

Thats a very good point - Im not really an expert on Frank/Gothic warfare but im not sure if their tactics would have allowed for the use of pilum type weaponry in terms of discipline as you have said.

Pila would also have probably been expensive just on the materials side because they were made of iron.

BTW Kagemusha GREAT sig!

In the 3rd-5th centuries the Roman Empire had too few men to defend the empire itself, so army service was made compulsory, which was an unpopular move, and seems to might have been abolished at a later date.
Many barbarians were recruited into the Roman army in the 4th century, and this led to a "barbarization" of the Roman army. The barbarians continued to fight in their style, which seems to not have included the pila.
One possible theory

This is based on what I've read in a military book about ancient warfare and my curriculum at Uni

Btw, the almogavares used a variant of the pilae during the Middle Ages.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almogavares

They were highly efficient and Aragon used them frequently.

Thanks Krusader!
Woderfull!So Pilum never really died out like i thought before.
Isnt it kind of nice too see that Legion like troops beated Knight Army.
This is very intresting. :bow: