if i was fixing to get banned how many of you would stand up for me?
Printable View
if i was fixing to get banned how many of you would stand up for me?
Clayton,
If you were 'fixing to get banned', wouldn't that mean you wanted to be banned? Why would we keep you from your heart's content?
It depends entirely on what you are being banned for...
clayton,
it would be most helpful if you could give your threads/polls titles that are a bit more clear about the content.
Starting several threads titled "Please answer..." or "Please respond..." ist not exactly helpful.
Thanks for your understanding :bow:
Ser Clegane
P.S.: As for your question - for banning and for being redeemed it is your behaviour that counts, not how many or how few other patrons "stand up for you".
If the .org bans some one, they were asking for it.
The .com on ther other hand...
Yes, I'm sure if the mods/admin was to ban you here, ther'd be good reason.
So no gets my vote.
i2 sday no because osf ththe if oyu get band its bfor dosme good resaont. ok? :winkg:
PLK new keyboards are a good thing, that or complete words, can't tell which.
I would not, and do not use the word fixin'.
As to standing up to you, I would understand the decision of the mods and not support you.
Please give your threads sensical and pertinent titles.
my kydorb is fyn!!! tis jst my sp'llinig antd typning skllwss which ayre needint some hilp! Ok!>>???? :sadg:
OMGZ SPEK BETR ENGISH!!11!!ONEeONE!!!1!!!!!!!
I can speak perfectly pretentiously if I so desire, but at that moment I disdained spelling.Quote:
Originally Posted by mongoose
That was a joke... ~;)
Any way, how is your quest to become the best spamer ever going? good?
I am not attempting to be the best spammer, but I may, at some point, seek after the title for the most posts in a twenty-four hour period, but that would require first determining the standing record. I believe that I have made around 175-190 today.Quote:
Originally Posted by mongoose
no ~:cheers:
No, i would not stand up for you. And i have my reasons why...
Because i am selfish.
I voted no, as a protest vote against Jacques Chiraque.
its not "no" its "non!"
i voted that too
Heheh...no one likes Clayton! Or, they just want to suck up to the mods and admins by agreeing with their actions.
I never understood why all newspapers and news programs suddenly adopted 'Oui' and 'Non' instead of 'Yes' and 'No' for the French constitution vote. What was the point - we speak English here, so why not give us the news in English?
When it was the Dutch referendum they didn't use 'Ja' and 'Nr.' Did they run out creativity there?
Actually, if i remember correctly, 'The Times' said on the frontpage: "Dutch say 'Nee'"
Right along with the knigths? Or where teh kinghts Dutch?... :winkg:Quote:
Originally Posted by CrayolaCrayon
This thread serves no useful purpose. Closed.