Well?
Printable View
Well?
my cpu is a neural net processor; a learning computer.
That was fast..
I use an Athlon 64 3500 (2.2GHz)
Damn, I can't remeber, and I picked out the parts at Fries.... I tried to look(seethru case) but there's too much dust I need to clean in there.....
Didn't see 'Processor' in Device Manager..
Pentium 4 3.20 Ghz
My computer uses an Athlon 3500+
Hal 9000
K.
Pentium3 933 FlipChip, Celeron 2.0 Socket 478, Pentium IV Northwood 2.6, Pentium2 200 (?), Motorola 68030, PPC 80 and 120 (?), C64 ~:)
Athlon 3200+.
Plays total war games which is all that matters ~:) .
Ummm AMD 1.4 GHZ, maybe that's why I can sort 10,000 troops on the battlefield. Those pentium chips suck ~D
.
P4 3.0 HT ~:pat:
.
This rubbish PC has P3.
P4 3.00 GHz :charge:
Pentium 4
Seriously, who uses Celeron? It's just a stripped-down processor. (IE. complete crap)
And I say who uses P4's?
They are just energy hogging heat fiends with inferior power and overclocking capabilities. IE complete crap.
My 2.2 GHz Athlon 64 cost 312 and gets better performance than an extremely expensive ($700+) P4 EE, because I can factory overclock safely to 2.475GHz and they can't oc at all due to heat and power.
Same with me.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mouzafphaerre
.
Brethren in CPU! :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by ghost908
.
AMD Athlon 2200+ or AMD Athlon 2500+. I have too very similar PCs side by side.
Looking to upgrade in the autumn.
P4 for me.
Pentium 4, 2,86 GHz ~:)
Athlon 2800, 2.1GHz. I'd rather not overclock it.
have that tooQuote:
Originally Posted by tibilicus
:balloon2:
P4 2.8
Quid
Just upgraded - P4 3.0
Gah!
Does it actually matter ??
Well I was just wondering... And yes it matters because Athlon 64's have the best performance and cost less than P4's that approach their power.
P4 2.66 may buy and Athlon 64 for my next pc if i can bring myself to part with the cash.