Printable View
This guy (Scott Stevens) probably already known by americans, has stated that the hurricane (Katrina) was a result of the use of some KGB dispositive.
link.
Is there anything more to say than :dizzy2: , I think not. But let's see if any of you find words for that.
...it's not?Quote:
Originally Posted by Soulforged
The only thing worse then being thought paranoid by your friends, is to be right. ~;)
Does the KGB still exist? Thought the Ruskies renamed it, or is a good name a good name and one tends to keep it? Makes one wonder why the Germans haven't found away to reinvent the use of the name SS.
Still, it is not paranoid - it is psychophrenia. Paranoid is when one believes someone or something is out to get them - if they are; is it paranoid?
Bending the weather has been a 'plan" of man for sometime. The American Indians had (do) their "rain dance", other civilizations had a variety of ceremonies that amounted to the same - or atleast sought the same conclusion. That is, that a god send them rain. The idea of controlling weather is deep rooted, but not practical (there are means to reduce the catagories [1-5] by a factor or two, by using chemicals, but the expense is almost as severe as the cost of the actual deluge (except in human suffering).
For someone to create graphs, illustrations, and a scernario that concludes that a nation created a cataclysmic storm seems absurd on its face. That it is being ridiculed may make some to pause just to wonder why such an absurd proclamation need be ridiculed by anyone. After all, it is an absurd hypothesis; ergo, why bother even printing it or making a suggestion for its legitimacy? Dumb is dumb .... leave it at that. Unless, by discrediting it the accussing party wishes to express a different point entirely. Such as, ......... really, how silly is silly? ~D