Something that's been pissing me off !

Ok this goes back to that Sartre thread in which I had a debate with Pindar about Essence and how it precedes existence and how Sartre was wrong because "his work is his own refutation" for stating the opposite ~:rolleyes: . Ok well Pindar kind of convinced me that Sartre was wrong, but now I read the origin of that theory, in Plato's Crito(or something) and it's not a very convincing argument. Socrate's recollection theory looks illogical to me. If you accept that the apparatus of the mind holds memory then how can the soul recollect past knowledge?

I'm lost~:confused:

RE-EDIT: I guess I need to contact every f***ing mod on this site to make a joke. I already notified Ser on this. See this thread here. Crap. Give me a little benefit of the doubt here.

I'm a little pissed, but I won't let the beer talk. Soly, I appreciate the in-thread convo and I consider you a rational mod, but I would have liked a PM for clarification. I have better things to do than flame BP. I'm just having fun with his own comments goddamnit.

It is obvious I need to upgrade my self-ban semi-lurk to a full on ADI-f***ing-OS.

solypist replies: relax. i only changed your post but gave out no alerts/warnings, closed no threads, and someone quoted you below and i left it untouched. still, there are better ways to have fun - remember everything sets a precedent.

3rd edit: I know. That's why I wrote "Soly, I appreciate the in-thread convo". And it was the beer talking a little. The Div, out!


Admit you are a homo BP.~;)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince

Socrate's recollection theory looks illogical to me. If you accept that the apparatus of the mind holds memory then how can the soul recollect past knowledge?

---

What do you mean BP? Are you sure you're not taking rare plants? In any case you should explain it a little bit more because as you presented it, it seems logical to me.~:confused:

If recollection of the soul is remembering things from before existence, and the brain holds all memory then how does the soul carry memory over to the brain? Plus Socrates' ways of proving this theory are about as believable as a magic trick.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince

If recollection of the soul is remembering things from before existence, and the brain holds all memory then how does the soul carry memory over to the brain? Plus Socrates' ways of proving this theory are about as believable as a magic trick.

---

You're talking about Croton (in honor to the cell companion of Socrates) or another book?
Aristole brought down all those metaphysic theories. Plato and his master were far too idealistic. This one of the results. The soul is part of the brain, all is the psique, appealing to the greek word. Psique means both, soul and mind. In that theory Plato said that your psique will abandon your body with that memory then you pass the river in Hades (I don't remember it's name) and finally you return in blank, you're the same but not the same. Though that part that you don't understand is easily explained as both mind and soul are the same thing. But from where did you got that the soul carries memories from past lives, that's not what I remember.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince

If recollection of the soul is remembering things from before existence, and the brain holds all memory then how does the soul carry memory over to the brain? Plus Socrates' ways of proving this theory are about as believable as a magic trick.

---

So books are slices of souls?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Papewaio

So books are slices of souls?

---

Well according to Socrates everything you learn from books or otherwise is simply recollection of things you ahve learned before you were born.

@Souforged: If you don't know this theory then you should read Crito and Phaedo. It's not my fault you don't know what the hell I'm talking about. ~;p

oh so its basicly reincarnation?, i belive in that, how you have a soul or whatever you want to call it that tranverses bodies for eternity. i also belive that some parts are not erased as you said, scraps of memory, bits of personallity, a strange kinship with items of past lives. yup, i believe i was egyptian in a past life (relying on evidence of dreams and how easily i seem to remember things involving egypt.) the same for rome (dreams, memories, knoledge) in both i think i was a warrior as since i was 3 years old i was fascinated with swords and war.~D

Yay post editing party

We are all homo, not all of us are sapiens though. - Mouzaphaerre

~;)

See this post here.

Sexually repressed Son-of-a-bitch.~D

The amount of homophobics who are homosexual is a greater percentage then the normal population by quite a degree...

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Papewaio

The amount of homophobics who are homosexual is a greater percentage then the normal population by quite a degree...

---

Should I send you a PM too?

:coffeenews:

Why? I will only take the piss.

Seriously... why worry about BPs sexuality? Its not like one more or less practicing hetrosexual is going to save the world or stop the population boom.

But if you want to PM me you can. Try and not attack me, but otherwise you can swear until your face goes blue... just don't swear in front of the kiddies. ~:cheers:

Papa,

Jeeze buddy. I could not give two flying F***s about BP's orientation.

It is a joke.

I would never attack you. You are a man of honor. I respect you more than you know.:bow:

I only wish you and yours the best that life has to offer. May life give you everything that you and your wife have dreamed. I mean that.

The Div.

let's have a post-editing party.

I agree... lets start with an is only before vowels ~;) :bow: ... really Soly I thought such a naughty boy. ~D

Here comes the Pindar response:

No.

~;)

Quote:

---

If recollection of the soul is remembering things from before existence, and the brain holds all memory then how does the soul carry memory over to the brain?

---

Boy oh boy, the idea that people worry about this sort of thing is what makes me glad I read Biochemistry.

Heads up BP. DNA exists*. Enzymes exist*. Souls carrying memories from before birth and putting them into your head do not exist*.

Sheesh. I can see why, say, a philosopher might be interested in work on the limits of language, or on ethics but this? You seem to be worried about a mechanism that dioesn't exist for a phenomenon that doesn't exist. Its intellectual masturbation, if that.

* "exist" is used here in a loosely logical positivist sense and I am not remotely interested in defining it further.