Printable View
OK so many in US think still Iraq was behind 911 and had WMD's, some Vice president and some President lie about.
Now, former president with vice, Bill Clinton famous for "not have sex", because certain part of body not enter certain part of body...
And now Canada youth mislead by this?
http://www.news-medical.net/?id=16133
Quote:
'sexual abstinence' for 26 per cent of teens includes practising oral sex
If it doesn't involve having a kid, its good enough for me.:2thumbsup:
Oral is no more sex than masturbation.
there is an important distinction in that one involves at least one other person besides yourself (unless you are rather flexible).Quote:
Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
:dizzy2: So then we must rename Sexual transfer disease to "disease transferring by sex and other social activity such as oralQuote:
Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
sexpleasuring"?:wall: :wall:
Gays, maybe, are not having sex, because reproducing organ can not enter reproducing organ of other?:dizzy2: :wall: :wall:
What is your definition?:balloon2:
Oral and masturbation, including mutual masturbation is sexual activity no doubt. It is not sex. Sex is when the penis goes into the vagina. Sex is what leads to reproduction.
You're kidding right?Quote:
Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
So in your view, there is no such things as homoSEXUALS.:wall: What the hell are they teaching you kids in Canada?
Didn't you read the first post? The young believe Clinton was right, "he didn't have sexual relations with that woman".Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
And I also read the next post as well where he said that sex only occures when a penis goes into the vagina. That's why i wanted him to explain the existance of homoSEXUALS.Quote:
Originally Posted by Spetulhu
Maybe because they engage in SEXUAL activities? :idea2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
There's always the backdoor for gays Dave... :juggle2:
Are you people illiterate? He said "Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
My point was that if two men butt ram each other or do the "lewinsky", by BP definition, they are not having sex. The rectum is not a vagina no matter what context you try to put on it. Lesbians do not have penises, no matter how butch they are. Do I really have to explain it to this detail for you people to understand my ### #### post?!?!?!?:furious3:
If somebody physically makes another person have an orgasm, it's sex. If two people engage in activities that would normally lead to an orgasm, and for some reason neither one can achieve climax, it's still sex.
To say that all sex must involve a penis entering a vagina shows a lack of imagination.
he's just conflating "sex" with "coitus". most of us make a distinction, considerig the common english usage. but if one wants to make up their own definitions for words, more power to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
:blush: Aww...~:pat:Quote:
Originally Posted by Devastatin Dave
Shucks Dave, :iloveyou: too ~:flirt:
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Big_John(how ironic), I was not making up the definition. In fact the definition has been expanded to include sodomy and masturbation. This is the the first definition that will some up: sex=intercourse: sexual intercourse
Sexual intercourse only has one definition, and that is the insertion of the penis inside the vagina.
Dave, homosexuals are sexual beings and they engage in sexual activities, but these activities are not considered intercourse, and they do not lead to reproduction.
BP is so far out.:dizzy2:
I know some churches maybe think sex should only be for reproducing, but to have that in supposed definition is very silly.
I think also animals have little imagination, but still have sex not because they thinking "I want puppy", but because "Ivana Humpalot".
Sex is not equal to vaginal penetration, vaginal penetration is traditional way to have sex.
Also now reproductional activity is not vaginal penetration, vaginal penetration++ is traditional way to reproduce.
Talk about splitting hairs, I guess if I'm banging a chick and I have a rubber on, I'm not really having intercourse with her right? Why do i even bother responding to the Great Troll of the North?:juggle2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
I was not trying troll. I was stating my opinion. Apparently you can't make a decent argument about why it is wrong.
Fine no more responces from me to you. Happy?
Why can't we all just get along? Here, maybe this will make the two of you chuckle....
https://img.photobucket.com/albums/v...00/bush_bj.jpg
It wouldn't just be me that would be happy with that decision. :book:Quote:
Originally Posted by Byzantine Prince
https://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e.../Europians.jpgQuote:
to explain the existance of homoSEXUALS
Sorry couldn't resist. That line made me think of that photo.:shame:
Heh I remember them from a song on DDR. Very... enlightening.
I can accept that some thing sex is penis into a vagina; I just accept that those people really need to dump their partners for someone else before they get too old to know what they've missed. :tongue3:
~:smoking