Re: New historical battles
Wow, alot of battles. With good historical information they will be way better than my history lessions. Thank's Ceg. :2thumbsup:
Re: New historical battles
I hope They don`t teach You only about Carolus Gustavus;),and You`re right -they can be very helpfully,especially for some history lamers.
Jag onska du trevlig P&M Mod spel !:juggle2: :sweatdrop:
Re: New historical battles
Yes I am a history lamer. ~;)
And good swedish there! Wished I could reply in polish but I can't. :wall:
Ceg what do you think of the battle of Narva 20 Nov 1700 a.d? Is the timeframe wrong?
"On November 20, 1700 (Julian calendar) the 8,140 man strong main force under King Charles XII engaged the Russian Army that was besieging the Swedish (now Estonian) city of Narva. The main Swedish force was assisted by around 2,500 men from within the city. The Russian army had great numerical superiority, numbering about 37,000 troops. Swedish sources from the time, still quoted in some literature, claimed that the Russians numbered 80,000 to 100,000; this might be a reasonable number when including the Russian support machinery of civilians, soldiers' wives and families.
The Swedish Army was commanded by the king himself, assisted by General Carl Gustav Rehnskiöld, and the Russian Army was commanded by Charles Eugène de Croy. Tsar Peter had left the army just days before.
The Swedish Army went into action at noon, protected by a blizzard blowing into the Russians' eyes, blinding them. The Swedes broke through the Russian lines and put the entire Russian army in a panic.
The casualties were relatively high for both sides, but the battle was a great Swedish victory. Sweden lost only 667 men (almost 7%) and the Russian army lost about 15,000 men, many of whom fled the battlefield, only to drown in the Narva River.
The remaining Russians capitulated and were given full quarter after turning over their weapons. Over 20,000 muskets were turned over to the Swedes."
Re: New historical battles
For now let's concentrate on those from the real pike and musket period i.e. before the Great Northern War and similar, later we can always add these as well... :2thumbsup:
Re: New historical battles
You are right. :bow:
Can't wait to play them all... And I shall try to be victorious in everyone. :2thumbsup:
Re: New historical battles
If you won Obertyn at the hardest level you might expect more difficult batles on the list above especially Szkłów 1654 - 10 to 1 ! Only recently I have read about this battle and it captured my imagination completely :dizzy2:
Re: New historical battles
You have to do chaldiran and Merv, that is all I will request. Chaldiran especially changed the whole fate of the muslim empires even unto today.
Re: New historical battles
For Ottomans
I agree with Battle of Chaldiran.
I also know abit about the Chaldiran Battle maybe can help you.
You should add Siege of Vienna also imho. (2nd)