I'm curious what the majority age range is at the Org.
I understand that the poll begins with smaller age ranges and grows to larger age ranges at the end. I promise that I have a reason for this.
Printable View
I'm curious what the majority age range is at the Org.
I understand that the poll begins with smaller age ranges and grows to larger age ranges at the end. I promise that I have a reason for this.
19 in Sep.
I presume you want to get some kind of a graphical portrayal of the age range on this site. In which case, I'm sure a mod/admin would be happy to oblige you...
16 and loving it, I can legally......
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Turning 15 years old in 15 days. :grin:
17...:juggle2:
32! I could almost be your dads - only physically - mentally I am still...well, never mind.
Quid
I'm 16 almost 17
813. 814 this August.
:inquisitive:Quote:
Originally Posted by evil_maniac from mars
try removing the eight. i think that will ease things. i think in 2005 the average age was 27.Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmic
remove some things in the babe thread? if you know what i mean..:grin:Quote:
Originally Posted by Eclectic
23 for now
Ajax
I turn 47 exactly one week from today. :balloon2:
It seems that the majority (who have voted at least) are between the ages of 16-18. I always that the majority was 25+?
No, I assure you, there is no need to remove the eight.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Spartan
Perhaps remove the 4?
No not the Babe thread!!! :balloon3: Leave it as it is!Quote:
Originally Posted by The Spartan
I really should've read the thread before selecting the poll choices. Now they're gonna block me from the Babe Thread! :help:
Not if you contribute to it! :balloon3:Quote:
Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
Nope, just seems that way because this is a very intellegent collection of people. :2thumbsup:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmic
(20 myself.)
Just curious -- why is there a "6 or younger" category? Do we really have anyone that young reading/posting? WOuldn't this entire experience be a bit drab and text-heavy for a five-year-old?
I was thinking that, but you beat me to it. Yes rather odd option!Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorba
I think that STW and MTW attracted a smaller community of older, hard-core wargamers. Once RTW came around, its greater mainstream appeal attracted larger quantities of a more typical, teen-aged gamer.
I agree to a degree. But even though I am a young funker I prefer STW and MTW to RTW. But I agree that RTW attracted more young people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kongamato
Guilty as charged :shame:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rythmic
Going to be 17 in october.
:balloon2:
Im 23.
Old and wizened, having just turned 44.
29, I am a walking midlife crisis in the making. Don't wanna be 30, but the alternative sucks as well. 30 means I will have to act responsibly, no way, I never grew up mentally and will forever be nuts.