Printable View
What are they? I understand dread is attained by execution of prisoners and refusing to pay ransom and that chivalry is attainted by releasing prisoners (and possibly accepting ransom?)
However, does a governer with alot of dread have more influence? Does a chivalric governer make more money but have less influence?
What is the direct effect of authority of a faction leader. Does authority of governers that are not faction leaders make any difference at all?
Thanks.
In battle, a general with high dread lowers his enemy's morale, while a general with high chivalry increases the morale of his own side.
Both give bonuses to public order, although it's much more for chivalrous generals
Hmm, I had noticed PO bonuses sometimes showing up, but I had simply assumed they were due to the governor picking up some trait line that was good for PO. Have you determined amount of PO bonus per point of each, Sapi?
I can confirm for certain that chivalry points directly cause a 0.5% bonus to population growth each in the governed city. This in turn can cause those 5% population boom PO bonuses to start showing up. I think it's something like 5% population boom bonus to PO for each 0.5% growth above 2.5%. This can be really handy, especially in the early days of your empire, to jump-start economic growth. I actually discuss the ways to get chivalry and the benefits of having it for a governor in a different post... it's worth reading, as you've missed mentioning a great many of the ways. You can find it here: https://forums.totalwar.org/vb/showp...&postcount=115
i've read that ransoming is the nuteral option and dosn't increase or decrease either chiverly or dread
Chivalry increases both population growth rate and overall happiness (glory, I think it's called), although it seems as though each point of chiv raises the growth rate by .5% and the happiness rate by 5%. Don't forget that high growth rates can also trigger "population boom" bonuses to happiness as well though. On top of that chivalric governors tend to get traits that further lower squalor, so you can end up with a HUGE growth bonus from a high chiv governor. They tend to pick up poor taxman traits and the like because you should always keep high-chiv governors in cities with normal or low taxes to further boost their chivalry (or at least to not decrease it any).
Dread doesn't do squat for population growth, but it does increase happiness due to fear. I believe it's a 10% bonus for each point of dread, but I have yet to specifically test this yet. Dreadful governors tend to pick up traits that further decrease happiness though (harsh judges, mean character traits, etc.), so be careful. They do tend to acquire traits that further increase profit in the settlements they are in, however (harsh taxman, etc.).
So basically chivalry assists with growth and in the long term makes cities large, profitable, and happy. Dread assists with short-term happiness and immediate financial gain, but has some long-term problems as some dread-related traits lower population growth and can eventually cause unhappiness that your high dread won't be able to deal with adequately.
Of course, it's much easier to gain dread. Sack, exterminate, execute, backstab, assassinate, and set taxes to extortionate levels and you've got the makings of a dreadful bunch of characters. However, nobody can argue that you're certainly making a ton of money and raising large armies in the process. To be chivalrous you need to keep taxes moderate, don't resort to assassination, release prisoners, occupy cities if you can get away with it (or at least don't exterminate), don't mercilessly run down fleeing enemies, go on crusades, etc - all behaviors that do not bring you any good fortune in the immediate game.
As was mentioned above, dread reduces enemy morale and chivalry increases your own side's morale. This means that dreadful generals work best with armies that rely on shock tactics to hit the enemy hard and hope they break - it encourages the enemy into breaking quickly (and hopefully chains it, too), meaning your troops suffer less casualties. With troops like cavalry, this is ideal - they excel on the charge, but suffer in protracted engagements. There's a reason the Mongols are so hard to deal with, and it's precisely because they have mostly-cav armies led by high-command, high-dread generals.
Chivalric generals, on the other hand, benefit most when leading infantry. Their extra benefits to morale ensure that your troops can take a hit and keep grinding away at the enemy. Rather than an all-out charge forward against the enemy, they make better use of the old "hammer and anvil" tactic of getting the enemy stuck on the anvil (your infantry line) and then nailing them with the hammer (shock cavalry or infantry waiting to support their heavier brethren).
While high-chivalry or high-dread generals can both be quite succesful in attack or defense, it's obvious that dread lends itself better to attacking and chivalry more to defending.
Hope that helps!
I forgot Authority!
These are all impressions so I might be wrong, but I've noticed the following about Authority:
-Almost all the generals I get while I have a high-authority leader have bonuses to loyalty, sometimes quite high bonuses at that (+5!).
-Authority seems to govern the chances of defection/desertion. I have captain-led armies rebelling left and right when my authority is very low, but I can rely on captain-led armies with no problem when I have a high authority.
-Characters seem to get the "feels appreciated" bonuses more often when you have a high authority leader.
Dread gives less than 10% a point. Probably closer to 5% every 2 points.
Authority only decreases chances of desertion and possibly has some input on diplomacy. No effect on traits your generals get at all.
I was referring to this trigger:Quote:
Originally Posted by heroic hungarian
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
As it turns out, I read it wrong. It actually seems to be a trait that gains a general a chivalry point if he is bought back during a ransom, rather than if he is holding captives which are bought back as part of a ransom.
I do not believe either of these statements are correct. For the most part, the triggers in the traits file do not check for dread or chivalry points, with the only typical exception being that they sometimes are checked to avoid giving a guy opposite points of what he already has. Like, if an action would give a dread point, it often will not do so if the guy already has chivalry points. You may think you notice trends like this, but they are entirely to do with factors other than having dread or chivalry points. More than likely you are employing a tax strategy or governing strategy that, while causing strategy or dread points, also causes other effects like tax-related ones. I can say very confidently, having looked through the trait file a lot, that things like good trader, good administrator, and numerous other economic and governing traits in fact have nothing to do with whether your governor has chivalry or dread, or how much he has, and everything to do with the situation you put him in in the settlement he governs. Among those things that contribute to such traits are:Quote:
Originally Posted by Snipafist
What kinds of buildings he builds
What kinds of buildings are present in the settlement
How often he builds
The tax rate
How happy the people are
Random chance
Many other things apply (and are too many for me to remember), but chivalry and dread are not among them.
Kinda off topic but I had a general who got a dread knight ancillary for releasing prisoners. He also had 2 or 3 chivalry points and I think 1 or 2 dread traits. Also I had another general who was a dread beast but got the Saint title in his name. It later changed to Malevolent after some more executions.
Happens escpecially often for faction leaders. I think my Turkish faction leader had his title changed over 30 times during the game.Quote:
Originally Posted by supadodo
This may not actually be that strange. Chivalry and piety are somewhat similar concepts in the game, so it would not surprise me if the Saint title is in fact tied to piety instead of chivalry. If that is case, as piety is entirely independent of dread/chivalry, this would be entirely possible if you have a dreadful yet pious general.Quote:
Originally Posted by supadodo
Anyone know if the Saint title in fact stems from chivalry or from piety?
Saint from Saintly Ruler (StrategyChivalry)
Then either it's some kind of wraparound error... or else the guy actually has tons of dread as well as having saintly ruler from StrategyChivalry. Contrary to what we would expect, it's actually quite possible to have numerous Chivalry and Dread traits at the same time, as they are generally only opposed by their antitraits, not the entire opposite Chivalry/Dread line of traits. So the man can easily have max StrategyChivalry from how he governs the town, while gaining at the same time BattleDread, CaptorDread, RansomDread, and many other dread traits that would make him awesomely dreadful, but not affect his StrategyChivalry trait points at all. I haven't seen this one myself though, so it's probably as likely to be a wraparound error as anything else.Quote:
Originally Posted by FactionHeir
I had a high Dread, high Piety Polish faction leader with "The Saint" in his name.
Due to some err, changes in the trait code between RTW and M2TW, the trait/antitrait system doesn't work the old way anymore. Basically, gaining a point in a trait will now wipe out any levels you have in opposing traits, which is why you can flip almost instantly from Chivalrous to Malevolent just by doing one wrong thing. This is also why Dread and Chivalry traits are NOT antitraits to each other, and why the traits file contains fairly complicated coding in order to ensure that you can't gain points in say BattleDread if you have points in BattleChivalry.
Oh DUH. Thanks Dopp... I knew about this one and just completely forgot about it since I've been playing with it fixed for so long.Quote:
Originally Posted by dopp
The problem must be in the antitraits hardcode which we can't get at. I actually have a fixer out for this problem. It involves removing the antitrait mechanic from the file entirely, and instead firing triggers all the time (I do mean all the time, like... at any recognized game event) that check if a trait and antitrait each have positive points. Whichever ones do get -1 each (like the game was supposed to be doing: antitrait points should cancel an equal number of trait points, not all of them). It makes the trait file considerably bigger, but otherwise does not seem to impact performance in any meaningful way.
I attached the fix to Kobal2fr's CherryVanilla VnV v1.11 Fix (with permission of course). The file is available here:
export_descr_character_traits.txt
For those of you not familiar with CherryVanilla, it's basically a bug fixer for the trait file. Fixes the broken agent guild code, and other things, without trying to change how easy or hard it is to get good or bad traits.
I should have a file patcher up at some point for this problem (to add the antitrait workaround triggers to any old custom traits file) but for the moment the fixed CherryVanilla file is a huge step in the right direction as it actually makes most of the VnV mechanics work like they're supposed to. I highly recommend it (and not just because it's partly my own work, lol).
Would I be able to include this file in my BugFixer Foz?
For my part, sure you can. You'll have to ask Kobal2fr as well though since it's his work too.Quote:
Originally Posted by Carl
Fair enough, thanks for your permishion. Will get in touch via PM.