Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Because their short range, and uncontrollable effects, limit them çuite a lot.
I was thinking that, if you built six or eight of them, you might win a bridge battle by simply placing them so that they range into the bridge path, and alternate the shooting so that it becomes a continuous fire. Some units of general spearmen might be useful to contain the initial waves, and then die gloriously in the organ gun´s salvoes, to increase the frag ratio, and maybe some arbalesters (or catapults) to fire at anyone attempting to snipe at your organ guns. This would allow for a very cheap defense force, but otherwise I see no use for them. Even in a typical bottleneck bridge battle (AKA: use a GOOD spear unit to hold a lot of enemies back and then shoot the hell out of them with arbalesters or bowmen) they´d do more harm than good, as they would likely kill off your troops as well as the enemy´s
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
I've honestly never even gotten an organ gun to fire and I've built them a few times trying to see what they could do. They are severely useless units. :p
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
In an experiment of mine, in which I tried full fields of artillery of a single type, to test their effectiveness, organ guns did deal severe damage, by chaining the shots, but overall they still got overrun fairly çuickly.
I´m considering possible uses. An obvious one would be small garrisons for castles and fortresses to prevent assaults, as if you retreat to the castle, a garrison of four or five organ guns would last for a long time, and if assaulted, the chained shots would cause severe losses to the enemy.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Haha, OG's are fun for the defensive. Especially in a nice, hilly place like Cordoba or Switzerland. 4 or 5 of them can absolutely cripple an opposing army trying to get up a steep hill. I've seen one blast send a unit of Byzz infantry running as thought the grim reaper itself was after them.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Yeah, but if you're after the fear of them, why not just bring out Arquebusiers? A few of those can send everyone running. (Especially pre-Janissary turks. :juggle2: )
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maloncanth
Yeah, but if you're after the fear of them, why not just bring out Arquebusiers? A few of those can send everyone running. (Especially pre-Janissary turks. :juggle2: )
I've used organ guns where they have appeared as mercenaries, in which case youa re not always going to be able to get arquebusiers instead. OGs are devastating when defending ridges - Golden Horde Heavy Cavalry routed before landing a blow. But given the choice I'd rather have serpentines and the longer range. Even for bridge battles the short range of OGs makes them tricky to use.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
I've seen lots of units take a salvo from arquebusiers and keep coming. A blast from an organ gun usually routs the recipient, and at the very least stops its approach.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Serpentines? I never use them. Culverins have longer range and not a significantly lower ammount of ammo. Plus, if you have to assault a castle in order to avoid a possible attempt to lift the siege, they will come in handy, whereas serpentines will not.
I did some experiments a while ago with each artillery type, checking which caused more casualties upon an incoming army of fodder. Culverins worked better overall.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
IMO the best use of organ guns, and one I've used quite often with great success, is at the front corners of a "demi-hexagon" defensive position. One thing to watch is the steepness of the slope - if it is TOO steep the OGs won't fire, as they can't target very far below horizontal. A gentle slope is better as it gives a range advantage and still will fire. They can do terrible damage and inflict those morale penalties as well. But then again I do have quite a taste for artillery in defence ~D
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
As I do. But I like a distance of safety. Hence I favor Culverins, aimed at the bulk of enemy troops, if possible in a path that takes out their general (might cause a rout before they even reach you, if you´re in a mountain) and then bowmen and spearmen at close çuarters
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
The AI likes to flank, so I put them on the flanks. Usually only one sees action but they always get a couple points of valor.
Re: Organ guns: any uses aside a potential bridge battle?
Organ guns are great when placed between units in defensive line. They will fire direct into attacker unit ranks or flank, causing massive casualties.