It can get you life in prison.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=185948
These two qualify for an honourary Darwin award. :no:
Printable View
It can get you life in prison.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=185948
These two qualify for an honourary Darwin award. :no:
I saw that, despicable.
Did they really think that soy milk would be a substitute for breast milk? I feel sorry for the baby, born to parents with no common sense. I don't feel sorry for the parents at all.
Its a shame we can't just criminalise stupidity.
Why do vegans not eat dairy products? Because they oppose animal husbandry, and taking baby animals from their mothers so we can have the milk instead.
None of which are exactly issues in breast feeding a baby human.
:yes:Quote:
Originally Posted by English assassin
Sadly, there wouldn't be enough jails...
Just so long as we have enough timber and hemp...Quote:
Originally Posted by Andres
Vegan diets can be sufficient for a human being to live off of.
Based on the info, the couple was clearly unfit for parenting. Why they got life-sentences for this is beyond me. This was a crime of negligence and stupidity, but I find it hard to see the couple as "savage baby killers". Although we love to use that term, don't we?.
I read this story earlier, very sad stuff. Why anybody would think that a newborn could exist on a vegan diet ... ugh.
Reminds me of a girl I used to work with, who declared that she had gone vegan. I was curious: "Where do you get your proteins? Calcium? Are you taking supplements?"
She looked at me blankly. "You do know that you have to be very careful when you're a vegan, right?" I said. She shook her head.
Fortunately, I saw her eating a burger not a month later, so all's well that ends well.
I'm just wondering how they thought a 3 1/2 pound baby was normal. And the fact that they ignored the big label on the soy milk container - NOT A SUBSTITUTE FOR BABY FORMULA.
And why didn't they try breastfeeding? Or is that against veganism?
Hippies... I wonder now, is there a vegan menu option in prison? There wasn't last time....
(This should answer your question too Grey Fox) Vegans believe in eating no animal products. That includes dairy products like milk, cheese, and eggs. While not meat they are from an animal. So these two ejits lumped human breast milk into that catergory, and refused to feed it to their son.Quote:
Originally Posted by English assassin
I also think that giving them life terms is a bit extreme. They do deserve some jail time.
So the woman thought of herlself more or less as a cow. And yet, paradoxically, cows feed their offspring with milk!Quote:
Originally Posted by lars573
Like I said ejits. They're probably the types that don't believe anything a doctor says. "Cause he works for the man, man!"
There's no intent here that I can see, just asnoishing amounts of stupidity. I get the feeling the jury just declared them guilty of murder because they felt the couple deserved a life sentence, but not much can be made out from the text.
Agreed, they don't deserve to be trialed for murder What complete morons, maybe it is for the better the kid died, keeps the genepool real.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenring
and no I don't mean that, bleh biohugend :thumbsdown:
Well, humans can't live from milk only, babies can, so I'm not sure whether comparing babies to adults like that is ok.Quote:
Originally Posted by CrossLOPER
I don't really understand the vegan "lifestyle" anyway, vegetarian is understandable to some degree, but vegan? Why is milk bad?:inquisitive:
It's all about not exploiting animals for human use. Milk, leather, anything that comes from animals. I can't really see how you could adhere to this in today's society, but whatever. Why the mother wasn't breast-feeding is a mystery, since that would be exploiting a human for human use. Maybe she wanted to start smoking the pot again, and didn't want to pass it along. Damn hippies! :hippy: :hippie:Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
A life sentence? This surely wasn't murder, since there was no intent....
Is this case an argument that a jury shouldn't decide the sentence, only the verdict? I'd say so.
Mrs. Apache had a swivel-eyed friend who was a vegan and a Jehovahs Witness. The evenings used to fly by. :sweatdrop:
Anyway she 'rescued' a dog from the pound and then only fed it veggies, just as you would with an omni/carnivore. He died as well. He was called Batley.
Absolute nutcase. :wall:
Well, they're really pushing the boundaries of stupidity in this case. That poor baby lived for 6 weeks of slow, painful starvation. It's not like they just made a stupid mistake and oops, the baby died. They starved it to death over a period of a 6 weeks- the suffering that baby went through was probably unimaginable. :no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenring
They were both charged with malice murder, felony murder and first degree cruelty to children. I guess the procecution wanted to make an example out of their stupidity. Now I can see them being guilty of neglegent homocide or manslaughter. But felony murder, I don't know.Quote:
Originally Posted by Myrddraal
Ugh, I can't stand vegetarianism or veganism. Or "vegetarians who eat fish". Damned hippies...
It's like any other choice an adult makes; there's some bad and some good, and you'd better read up and know what you're doing before you mess with your diet. There's nothing more sad than an uneducated vegan.Quote:
Originally Posted by Duke Malcolm
Any action you take which leads to willfully starving a baby to death, however, merits jail time. Veganism and vegetarianism are for grown-ups, folks.
All I have to say is that these are some heartless mo%*$^@!$+ers. 6 weeks!?!? 6 weeks!?!? All i have to say is that anybody here that's thinking 'geez, they just didn't know any better' hasn't spent any time around infants. Princess Jillian is about as sweet as they come, and I couldn't stand 6 seconds of her crying when she's hungry, let alone 6 weeks!? That baby must have been shrieking incessantly. How on earth did they keep from going insane?
I would say, I'd like to know who gave this brain trust the bright idea that vegans cannot consume human breastmilk either. The authorities should book them on accessory charges. Encouraging this sort of behavior should be criminal at some level as well.
Also, weren't they taking their baby in for follow ups at 2 and 4 weeks? Diddn't the doctor notice that the baby's weight had dropped to 3 1/2 lbs??!?!? They don't let you take your baby home in the first place unless he/she weighs at least 5 lbs.
I see lots of culpability all the way around here. Poor little boy, what a horrific way to go. :shame:
There are probably aggravating factors, like turning the television up loudly and closing the baby off in a room, or engaging in other activities besides watching the kid. Also, the first link said the kid was born at home, so he didn't get the super cocktail formula they give newborns in the hospital, so he was off to a bad start from the go.
A longer article:
http://www.wsbtv.com/news/13245543/d...5243&qs=1;bp=t
Hmmm...
Vegans deny their child a proper diet out of a combination of ignorance and adherence to ideological dogma, causing the child's death, and they get thrown in jail for murder.
JWs deny their children a routine but critical blood transfusion out of a combination of ignorance and adherence to religous dogma, causing their children to die, and they face no criminal charges because they did it under orders from God.
Seems fair to me.
It's a tragic, totally unnecessary death - but I would't be surprised to find out the parents were that clueless. I've seen, heard and read of people ignorant enough to do such a thing without intent.Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Corleone
According to MRD's link the prosecutor implied that the kid could have survived just fine on a vegan diet, but accused them of deliberately feeding him to little. I'm not a nutrition expert but that reeks of bullox because
1) even if you trippled the meals, it would still be lacking in proteins etc.
2) if you intend to starve someone, why feed him/her anything at all?
I'd say there are two possibilities here:
A) the parents were determined to feed him only vegan food, consciously accepting the chance that he would starve (but not "wanting" it)
B) the parents honestly, foolishly believed that a vegan diet would be sufficient
If I were a jury member and was convinced that A) was true, I'd have no trouble letting them rot in jail. I'm not a jury member though, all I know comes from 2 news articles and I'm not willing to dismiss possibility B). It would still be completely irresponsible and prison-worthy, but it wouldn't be murder.
Breastfeeding would have more then likely killed the mother then. Without protien in their diets or protien suppliments the mother would have slowly starved.Quote:
Originally Posted by Grey_Fox
This is a moronic crime, I hope they enjoy the vegan diets in jail.
Not true. My cousin is a strict (annoying/militant) vegan. She breastfed both of her children and remained very healthy. What's more, her two kids have never consumed anything that came from an animal (other than from mom) and they too are very healthy. I don't know where everyone is getting this idea that you can only get protein from meat. It takes more work and knowledge of food, but a person can be very healthy on a vegan diet. You just might not have any friends because they are all so sick of you trying to make them feel guilty all the time...Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTex
True.Quote:
Originally Posted by BigTex
Not saying that you can't get protien off of a vegan diet. I'm saying these people are clueless about what they need to eat and probably wouldnt have. If you notice their responses to the protien suppliment and vitamin suppliment questions they were clueless. Nice cheap shot though, gotta admit it though, I have very few vegetarian friends and not one is a strict vegan. The allure of good Texas Barbeque (not grilled, barbeque) is just to great.Quote:
Originally Posted by Goofball