Re: In EBBS - Roma or Rome ?
I've searched out this earlier, resulting in the typo fix that is incorporated in 0.81a V2. It's tricky knowing which file is the master when it's spread out everywhere... My belief is that EB/Data/text/imperial_campaign_regions_and_settlement_names.txt is the master which the rest of the files must match. The trick here is that some commands use internal settlement name, and some use display name. Rome has internal name Rome and displayname Roma, so everything *should* be ok.
Re: In EBBS - Roma or Rome ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by bovi
I've searched out this earlier, resulting in the typo fix that is incorporated in 0.81a V2. It's tricky knowing which file is the master when it's spread out everywhere... My belief is that EB/Data/text/imperial_campaign_regions_and_settlement_names.txt is the master which the rest of the files must match. The trick here is that some commands use internal settlement name, and some use display name. Rome has internal name Rome and displayname Roma, so everything *should* be ok.
Ok. I went searching in archives and found someone saying that in EBBS, you must use the display name (that appears in the campaign map) and not the internal map.
This is incredible indeed...
Thanks for your info.
Re: In EBBS - Roma or Rome ?
Quote:
Originally Posted by JMRC
Ok. I went searching in archives and found someone saying that in EBBS, you must use the display name (that appears in the campaign map) and not the internal map.
That's just wrong. As bovi says, i depends on the command being used.
Re: In EBBS - Roma or Rome ?
To expand on Atilius' post: all conditionals, with the exception of SettlementName ask for the internal (in this case Rome) settlement name.