Printable View
Do you think that Roman players should be forced to use one period for a legion, and not mix and match?
I personaly think they should, otherwise we get people taking "the best of both worlds" which is unbalanced and unfair. (option 3)
By an adjacent time period I mean that a player, if he choose marian, can have either, a few polybians, or a few imperials.
I personally think that option 3 is the best one. I play the Romans all the time, especially in MP and i don't like using units from anything but one period which is usually Marian.
As long as these legions are close to the historical ones, I vote to let them choose only from one period. So please no armys of only Praetorians or such.
I just beat one of thoose... heroic victory with 21% looses.:laugh4:
Horse archers?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharnakes
No, praetorians.
hum.... well.... it really depends on the players. I chose option one.
I mean... I the players should agree on what type of gameplay they are going to use BEFORE they start the battle.
This is for the rules of an upcoming multiplayer tournament, I think. In regular games the players can decide whatever they want.
Yeah
Edit: BTW Bovi, did you say you weren't going to join?
No, I meant what units you used?Quote:
Originally Posted by Pharnakes
Theres a tournament starting soon?Please let me get back in time for it.Still away visiting family.Oh,and I say let them choose between one time period.Using historical legions seems to restricting for choices.Quote:
Originally Posted by bovi
That's right Pharnakes, I probably won't be able to make the time.
dang it :wall: I think I am gonna miss the 1st tournament ~:mecry:
Ohh, just my little Pontus stack, that I would have introduced you to yesterday if hamachi hadn't been playing up.Quote:
Originally Posted by Moros
i voted for option 3.
it'd also be nice if we could get triarii unit reduced to half a size.
People refering to historical armies and such, I don't think that's feasable. I mean sure you can make roman historical armies and what about the other factions? I mean try to make a Saba historical army... Or Saka for that matter...
If players wanna have an army with as much praetorians as they can get, let them. It's a really bad army actually as you'll have around 1100 (roughly 37K mnai) guys who can be easilly defeated by combined arms... Really that's not a really good army as soon as your cavalry hits them and they get pinned by your infantry they're as good as dead.
Cheers...
I don't see how you can reasonably justify limiting Roman players options without also limiting all other factions who undergo reforms as well
good player shouldnt use romani in the first place
cmon they are soo overpowered
less than phalanxes...
Cheers...
They may be overpowered, but they look so cool.