Originally Posted by Baba Ga'on
Initially I thought the book would be a balanced argument about how what the Greeks and Romans saw as dirty, savage "barbarians" were actually quite cultured and advanced themselves, with advanced social and political structured that many Greco-Roman authors never gave them credit for.
Instead, it turned into an all-out, ill-argumented, selectively supported anti-Roman rant, in which the authors tried to completely discredit everything about the Romans. So: instead of making the attempt to put both the Romans as well as the "barbarians" in their proper contexts, it ends up becoming just as ill-concieved a one-sided (not to mention badly sourced) harangue as seeing the Romans as the only lights of "civilization" and "progress" in the ancient world.