http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...ons/index.html
Like were going to deport him pfffffft. He reaps what he sows
"Welcome to the thunderdome *****"
Printable View
http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/10/...ons/index.html
Like were going to deport him pfffffft. He reaps what he sows
"Welcome to the thunderdome *****"
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strike For The South
Legally, he deserves a new trial if that's what the international body ruled.Quote:
The Constitution's Article VI says "all treaties made ... shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby."
"The Constitution means what it says," said Justice Stephen Breyer. "But there happened to be a few instances where the nature of the obligation or the intent of the party makes it difficult to enforce it as a binding judgment of a[n international] court. That is not this case."
I don't see where we are going to deport him?
Although, I do agree death is warranted for such a heinous crime of gang rape and murder. I'd be satisfied with that or life imprisonment with heavy labor.
Go Texas.
CR
Go legal international treaties. :dizzy2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazed Rabbit
What kind of circumvention is that to say something like "Oh, we made a treaty with you, true, but you see, it's not applicable in our [provinces] because they are almost-not-really-wannabe-sovereign"?
The Constitution is clear on this case.
Of course if the evidence is clear, which I'd hazard a guess it is, the verdict won't come out particularly different.
Quote:
Originally Posted by AntiochusIII
what for?
crime was commited in texas
Read the article. It is fairly obvious.Quote:
Originally Posted by K COSSACK
shrugh* oookayQuote:
Originally Posted by Ice
*reads it