This Poll is to Determined rather I should take Over this IH, Start it over again,or just quit it for good.
Dummy me didn't know I can make a poll myself. I always went by the deal that Only Mods Could. Dummy me :wall:
Printable View
This Poll is to Determined rather I should take Over this IH, Start it over again,or just quit it for good.
Dummy me didn't know I can make a poll myself. I always went by the deal that Only Mods Could. Dummy me :wall:
Keep on Voting Peeps, got 2 already (Hey... I can vote for myself. Can Bush Vote for himself back in the 04 elections? Yeah.. Well, that's your answer:yes: )
And I just Stuck the GAH and Cashews and Milk in a comcial relief :yes:
I don't know which of the options this is, but I would like it to continue, but not have you play because it leads to imbalances.
Such As?Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
Janos, You nut!! :wall: :laugh4: :laugh4:
Tran, Omans,Sword, Vote! :yes:
You knowing everyone's moves before they are made.Quote:
Originally Posted by {BHC}KingWarman888
Only if you give up your own country
Yea and? Who saids I'm going to cheat? Netheir would I cheat, or shortchange myself.Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
No Different then DOH doing Non-Playable Factions.
"but it's non-playable, and you want a major faction....."
Um, Ok, so DOH is doing Non-Playable, you think he doesn't have a advantage with Veince and Perisa Right now? He knows all of the Orders, so you think he might not (not saying he would), for example, have the Persians/Venice stuck at the Ottomans where Kami's Army is only lighty Defending after he read Kami's Decsions? I mean come on. To Be Truly Netrual (if you one of those people), Then you just don't do any faction, Playable or non.
Hey,
I let this Thread/Poll run it course before we make a Final Decsion, But I am thinking........
How about This. We do what Kagemush and Ichi been telling, just wait for DOH. Now if he doesn't log in by the end of November or Early December, then you know lol :laugh4: , we can re-dicuss this. But if you guys want to go on now, then I will Not Play as Austria, and Ask the People on the Waiting List if they like to take my Place. If none of them do, I ask some other people.
In the Meantime, I'll start two IH's. Stephen Asen told me to do a Kraxis style IH (to many MP IH's you see:yes: ), but I have no bloody idea whatsoever how to, which brings me to this conclusion.
I would make 2 new IH's. One of them would be 17 centruy (Spoke to Rodion about this)and it would start in 1617 (not 1609), and end in 1650 or little later.
The Second IH I would make a Small One, only a few playable factions, easiler to manage, and it would ethier be a 1200 IH or a 200 A.D IH.
And I would not play as a faction, only NPF's in the IH I make!
Trust me, only run one IH at a time. Warluster can back me up on this one. One or both of them will die.
Bloody oath.
It may be a small one but it eventually evolves until its massive and time consuming... Stick to one, it'll stay fun.
I'd suggest you go with the Medieval/Ancient one, Legio has already done the 17th Century.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Warluster
Yea, I was going to try to do a 17 centruy remake, but not only it be done, it would kinda not make sense because of when I would end it.
What do you guys Prefer?
But I have a Day...
How about a 1400's/1500's IH? I don't think that be done before, and looking at this link:
http://www.euratlas.com/big/big1400.htm
it would like intersing... But so Does the 1200's.
What you guys think?
Just pick whichever time period you are most interested and be damned with what people say.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
That What I say :2thumbsup:
Looks like the polls a tie. That is not counting your votes KingWarman, (which I notice are all for Gah, Cashews and Milk and Yes.:laugh4: )
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Warluster
I was thinking of doing somewhat intersting (and no, I won't play in them,only as the NPF's..), I would do a IH about 1660-1700. Well, in that 40 year time span, you got the Ottomans Wars in 1660's, in 1683-1697, you got the French .vs. Coaltion (Netherlands,England,Austria), and I think France went to war with Austria in the 1670's to. Russia was at war with the Ottomans once or two during that time span, You Had the Battle of Vienna,etc...
Intersting timespan, and it the most good I'm at. I was going to do a 1500 IH, but don't know what date I should start it at.
Cashews and Milk...eww. :skull: :damnmate: :tnt:Quote:
Originally Posted by Warluster
Good luck! :2thumbsup: And yet I miss the Kraxis type. You know, it would be quite interesting to play a puppet master or something like this. Or making an Interactive ( Multiplayer) with people playing as courtsmen in a single court. Intrigues, intrigues...Quote:
Originally Posted by {BHC}KingWarman888
Hey Asen, yea, I got your Private Message, but I been busy, I respond to you soon :beam:Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Asen
I never played in a Kraxis, and since he is doing another IH of his own, it would be nice to see how he does it so mabye I could one day :yes:
Yeah I've considered doing something like this before, but I struggle to think up the aims of different people.Quote:
Originally Posted by Stephen Asen
Hey,
ok, even though the poll doesn't close for a couple more days, I am going to make it final now.
I will make a another IH and will only do the Non-Playable Factions and will not play a major playing country, and leave the Spanish Go.
It will be from 1660-1700, and after that, we can discuss me doing a Remake of the SPanish War/Northern War.
a IH starting in 1648, or a IH starting it 1660 at the ENding of the Polish-Swedish War?