Printable View
I really think this is true lets see
guns-much less range
arbalests-good range
guns-cuase fear
arbalests-dont nbd
abalests-kill same amount of people as guns ive noticed but have much more time to do so because of the range (ive won whole battles with arbalests only valor 0-1)
any ideas to prove me wrong welcome because i jsut find guns (and siege workshops but thats a different matter.....) useless
arbalest are too strong for their costs, its hows online, most people use them
guns are still good but no way near as strong as they where in shogun/MI. I don't go near the handgunners I go straight for the arq's. Arbalestes are good but they don't cause the fear that guns do I normally go for 2 pasive arbalestes & 1 arq. Very few units will be able to make it to melee with my line with that kindof firepower. the ammo dosen't last long now for guns aswell. Stick 2 longbow men behind your spear units & it becomes a killing spree
It isn't like Shogun because it was a different age, 1300-1400 vs 1400+.
In 100 years tecnology improved a lot, so in the Late Middle-Age we have only arq, not musk like in Shogun, and arq had a short range and a bad accuracy.
given the option, why not use both?
he's ruight, in 100 years technology, alot can happen with guns. thast why