I think you're correct Romanic, I interpreted it erroneously first time. Though Chaotix' reasoning is strange, if we imprison two people at a time we are more likely to catch somebody, I would rather have two suspects than none.
Printable View
I think you're correct Romanic, I interpreted it erroneously first time. Though Chaotix' reasoning is strange, if we imprison two people at a time we are more likely to catch somebody, I would rather have two suspects than none.
We haven't heard from God Emperor in a while... vote: God Emperor
All right. I see the sense in Romanic's suggestions. I'll take this into account in the future.
However, I'd still like to see Arpeg with his full reveal.
And I'd also appreciate some of the votes coming off of me.
... very well. Unvote: Chaotix
Vote: God Emperor
For now, anyways. I have a hunch that this deal with Arp is either accident or setup.
For some balance reasons, mainly due to the fact that Warriors can near enough do everything Rogues can in the games, I've made some distinctions between Rogues & Warriors:Quote:
Originally Posted by Double A
Warriors wear heavier armour, can wield two-handed weapons and can use shields.
Rogues wear lighter armour, can dual-wield and can use bows.
There is a distinction in this game between innocents, who all pursue the same goal of neutralising the mafia, and neutrals, who pursue their own unique victory conditions; Reenk was not innocent... or he wouldn't have abandoned his old life to become a legionnaire. :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Chaotix
Vote: Mr.This
For pressure, nothing more, nothing less.
If chaotix accepts your story, I shall move my vote.
You want a full reveal? Have I not already given you enough?Quote:
Originally Posted by spL1tp3r50naL1ty
A full reveal would likely get me killed anyway, Secura has hinted that some players might have certain "agendas" to remove me.
I would like to outright state I have no intent to kill anyone as part of any victory conditions.
I'm sure you'd not take my word for it however...
So chaotix claims roleblocker, to make sure that he doesn´t get voted off... Vote: ArepeggiateTHIS
This was also stated. I think what Secura meant was that victory conditions will change.Quote:
Originally Posted by spL1tp3r50naL1ty
Can you not just throw me in jail?Quote:
Originally Posted by Khazaar
Oh, and I will reveal if that is what general consensus would have me do. Or if it saves my skin. I'm just not happy that it would come to this.
Unvote;
I'm not wanting a bandwaggon here, just pressure.
There has to be a majority. And the others have voted lynch against you, currently it doesn´t look very good, but there´s still time...Quote:
Originally Posted by ArpeggiateTHIS
Imprision: Mr.This
An attempt to change your fate, I'd prefer you given time, and the benefit of the doubt for now.
Imprison Chaotix
I honestly think Mr This has given a rather fine roleclaim, that I find it wierd Chaotix won't let go of the idea that Mr This is a guilty person. Also Secura seemed to back up some of the things Mr This said?
Yes I am sorry for my minor participation, but I am on vacation, and that it sadly does not allow me to be active all of the time
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Yes, in Star Fox I was Bill Grey. And I got killed. And I was proven to be Bill Grey. And my investigative actions were proven.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beskar
Just for the record, there.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Ohhhhhh, right.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beskar
Set-up? Oh really. How do you figure that? Chaotix and Arpeg got together last night and said "Oh, I know what we'll do. There's nobody in prison, so let's skip our kill. Then one of us will run out there saying "OMG I was roleblocked don't kill me guyz I'm just looking to get married". Then the other will say "I roleblocked him! He's guilty, full role-reveal or the dwarf dies! Or I marry him, whichever. Oh, and we'll get Secura to back up the marriage story, too, that's the ticket."Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaseikhaan
Yeah, now there's a plausible plan.
Let's look at the other option: you randomly called Chaotix scummy yesterday without specifying why, then hit the jackpot today (or so you thought) when a dead innocent (well, non-mafia) fingered Chaotix as well. You got to say "yay, I was right!" and look all innocent and stuff. Then he turns out to be a roleblocker -- whoops. Back off fast and vote a lurker, but don't forget to over-justify your original vote along the way with this silly "setup" comment.
vote: Yaseikhaan
Yes it appears that mr this has being set up though there is a possiblty that he has not and we have got incredibly lucky I say contiune to role block him for now if the mafia really want to set him up let them waste more nights in doing so. I feel it is too early for the mafia to be pulling a dual bluff.
Oh, a setup of ArpTHIS, not a setup by ArpTHIS. Which must be what Khaan suggested also.
unvote
That's almost plausible. Plausible enough not to be scummy, anyway.
Chaotix explained why it is unlikely that Arpeg is being framed : Last night, the mafia didn't know about Chaotix's ability and thus could not refrain from killing to frame Arpeg on the basis that he would be in jail.
No, a frame by Chaotix himself. Refrain from the kill while roleblocking the previous day's top living suspect, then vote the suspect on the grounds there was no kill. Think that's what Khaan was getting at, anyway. Not so sure about Blackadder.
No I am saying that the mafia simply chose not to kill in an attempt to fram this and the role block is simply a coincidence.
How is a no-kill framing Arpeg if they didn't know he was being roleblocked?Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder
That's what doesn't make sense. There's no frame if no one is locked up or otherwise incapacitated; it's just an unexplained no-kill.Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Blackadder
If we imprison chaotix, he can't keep blocking others. unvote:chaotix
For lack of a better option, vote: god emperor
Sorry I am paying way too much attention to the other game and not this one reading back over the thread for some reason I thought that This was imprisoned last night. Disregard what I said earlier.
What if somebody was attacked and dodged the attack? Is that a possible explanation Secura?
I am not in favor of killing anybody given the seeming 'slowness' of this setup. There are numerous ways for power roles to resist attacks. So people aren't dying at such a rate that merits executions.
Current tally to the best of my knowledge:
Vote God Emperor: 3 (Double A, Yaseikhaan, autolycus)
Imprison Chaotix: 3 (johnhughtom, Pinman, God Emperor)
Imprison ArpTHIS: 2 (ArpTHIS, Split)
Vote ArpTHIS: 2 (Chaotix, Khazaar)
I think Imprison Chaotix is a bad move. If some don't believe him, we can pick someone for him to roleblock and that person can tell us the next day if he did it or not. I don't think that's necessary though because of ArpTHIS's claim of being roleblocked.
If I have to Vote: God Emperor, whom I don't even know why we are voting for, to stop Chaotix from being imprisoned, then so be it.