Printable View
I don't understand. If you've read the thread you must have some comment or other. Are you saying you haven't even read the thread? Or is this just a "oh look they're lynching the lurkers I'd better post something?" post?Quote:
Originally Posted by Drisos
Hmm? That's not a particularly convincing reason to vote someone, especially after accusing disco of lying to help out prole. Why didn't you vote for one of them?Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Which are what, exactly? The argument against him is essentially the same as my initial argument against Banquo, without the addition of Banquo's extremely sketchy defense.Quote:
Originally Posted by discovery1
Honestly Sasaki, I don't see how you expect people to have figured out who the mafia are at this point. There's only been one night and a lot of the posters have been inactive due to thanksgiving. Sure the thread is already pretty long but not that much interesting has been said.
People pointed out the wanaka reference,
people pointed the bane of lurkers and abstainers,
people accused and defended BG
We don't have much to go on.
I disagree. There's been plenty interesting said, and plenty that will be interesting later on.
We've also lynched mafia round 2 before...and I was pretty sure Drisos was mafia in age of darkness and that was round 1 or 2.
Well I was defending the head monk and the detective in that game, I just got lucky. Why did you suspect Drisos ?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Actually my awesome new method points to Drisos in this game, but his lack of posting due to absence (and being mafia in the previous game) made me vote for good ol' Reenk.
Maybe I should be more consistent ?
Unvote: Reenk
Vote: Drisos
changing votes is going to make me look suspicious isn't it ?
I suspected Drisos because he was being accusatory unlike in past games. I don't find your change of vote on Drisos suspicious though, because his "I'm inactive, sorry" post in this game sounded a lot like his "not much time for mafia right now" post from last game, where he was guilty.Quote:
Originally Posted by doc_bean
Yes.:sweatdrop:Quote:
Originally Posted by Seamus Fermanagh
This be very easy question to be answered by my humble townie virtual existance human being...the answer be:Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
One of them lied(or maybe just didn't know better?), but that does not make any of them necessarily mafia. Also notice that it didn't make you change your vote either, so why do you expect me to?
My voting for Destroyer of Hope is part of my bigger plan for saving universe from evil mafia, but, isn't it weird that suddenly all the lurkers pop up again?
Or was it just Drisos and Destroyer of Hope? Why do they pop up again and why is he not even trying to get his grammar/spelling right so people can understand what he wants them to know? I honestly couldn't understand what he wanted to tell me.
Then again, I read something that sounds like I should vote BG, but since I forgot what it was, I may have to read it again.:2thumbsup:
Day Two Voting (as of 9:25am 11/25/6 EST)
Banquo's Ghost = 4 (Aggony Duck, Destroyer of Hope, Divine Wind, Sasaki Kojiro)
Divine Wind = 3 (God's Grace, Masy, Seamus Fermanagh)
Ignoramus = 3 (Csar, Discovery1, Zalmoxis)
Destroyer of Hope = 2 (Husar, Proletariat)
Craterus = 1 (Ignoramus)
Drisos = 1 (Doc_Bean)
Proletariat = 1 (Silver Rusher)
Sasaki Kojiro = 1 (Sigurd Fafnesbane)
Abstain = 6 (Banquo's Ghost, Craterus, Crazed Rabbit, Drisos, Kommodus, Reenk Roink)
No Vote = 5 (Don Corleone, Dutch Guy, Kagemusha, theRTWGuru, Xiahou)
:oops: Sorry for listing Prole' twice in the earlier count, as GH noted, it was Sigurd who cast a vote for Sasaki. Prole' had voted for Sasaki earlier, and I had a brief moment of intellectual flatulence.
You're still mad over the "A_friend" thing aren't you? :wink: ~;pQuote:
Originally Posted by doc_bean
But seriously, can somebody actually tell me how abstaining is a mafia cover? And why I am the only abstainer (out of several) who gets this [crap]?
Righto Divine Wind:
It's ok, I was in fact joking (Ironic eh.) In order to play the game, however, I find it's best to leave all my nice aspects (Of which there are some, I assure you) outside the thread. Role play and all that.Quote:
He voted for me. Firstly, I will admit that I am hurt by his accusation
Hurt? I dread to think how you survive in the real world Masy. Its just a game, I meant nothing by it. I just randomly selected you from the group of abstainers. Nothing was meant in it to annoy you or critiscise you. Just random.
Fair enough, (and btw I just looked at your public profile when you aroused my suspicions, I honestly don't keep time logs of mafia players...) you may not have had time to create a vote. I realize my argument is not the most concrete and damning in the world, but the game has gone for only 2 rounds, and you're the one I suspect the most at this time.Quote:
GAH! Im being stalked! Do I need to get the police involved?! Im currently working long hours at my new job, so any break I get are usually spent looking at the Medieval 2 forum for 5 - 10 minutes. Hence why I dont post in the mafia thread until I get back from work
In all, a respectable reply DW. However:
Yes indeed. But yet, you vote for Banquo's Ghost nonetheless, without an argument for your case. That, compiled with my previous suspicions,keeps my vote as it stands.Quote:
I dont think bandwagoning achieves anything
Because you always abstain when you're town, so if you were mafia you could just abstain every round and no one would be the wiser.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Well, after a mind-numbing read of 4 pages of back posts....
Vote: Divine Winde
Based on his own comments and the subsequent discussion, he seems most suspicious.
What, specifically?Quote:
Originally Posted by Xiahou
It was mainly the "let's kill the happy people, LOL" post. I found Masy's response persuasive as well. I had been thinking of voting for BG, but I found his defense credible.
Of course, there's a strong possibility that both are innocent.... but we have to start somewhere, no?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Actually, I didn't know who to vote for and I was too lazy to sift thru all the posts and actually come to a decisions. Csar told me to vote for Ignoramus, so I did and just spewed out some reason.
Will I be lynched for voting for Reenk on the grounds he goes to Michigan?
:laugh4: No, it's the fact that you keep abstaining that makes you such a good target. Your posts don't say anything about your thoughts.Quote:
Originally Posted by Reenk Roink
Besides, I already changed my vote.
ProbablyQuote:
Originally Posted by discovery1
:balloon2:
Voting over.
We have a tie vote between Divine Wind and Banquo's Ghost.
As much as I hate to drag out this session even further, it must be done.
There will be a re-vote. You can only vote for DW or Banquo. Voting will end in about 24 hours.
~~~~~
Here is the voting tally for Round 2:
Divine Wind: 4 (Masy, Xiahou, Seamus Fermanagh, God's Grace)
Banquo's Ghost: 4 (Sasaki Kojiro, AggonyDuck, Divine Wind, Destroyer of Hope)
Ignoramus: 3 (Csar, Zalmoxis, discovery1)
Destroyer of Hope: 2 (Proletariat, Husar)
Craterus: 1 (Ignoramus)
Sasaki Kojiro: 1 (Sigurd Fafnesbane)
Proletariat: 1 (Silver Rusher)
Drisos: 1 (doc_bean)
Abstained: 8 (Craterus, Kommodus, Reenk Roink, Crazed Rabbit, Drisos, Banquo's Ghost, Dutch_guy, theRTWGuru)
Didn't vote: 2 (Don Corleone, Kagemusha)
But we know that's not true. I've actually voted for someone 6 times now since I've started abstaining.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
I voted Masy for being suspicious and then investigated him as detective to confirm: he was a mafia
I voted Sasaki for extreme suspiciousness in the Kage/Sasaki thing: you were a mafia
I voted Destroyer of Hope in a retaliation vote: he was a mafia
I voted Csar in a retaliation vote: he was a doctor :oops:
I voted and then personally killed AggonyDuck as a vigilante: he was a mafia
I voted Hepcat to save my skin: we don't know what he was
Obviously the good karma for being a responsible voter is there... :wink:
It's much better than the List...~;p
But I will give you guys my thoughts next time so you can do your psychology or what not and stop voting for such a stupid excuse... :rolleyes:
Edit: GH posted the kills and I have read the thread. I'm leaning on Banquo's Ghost because the arguments against him are decent, even though they may have been a bandwagon. That and I don't know much about Divine Wind to have anything incriminating. Not going to vote yet until they talk or time runs out...
Vote: Banquo's Ghost because the coin landed heads.
Vote: Divine Wind
As before.
Vote:DW
Fricken Sasaki spaming the thread.
Vote: Divine Wind.
Either DW, or BG. And I simply don't think it's BG, even though the arguments put forward to contain some logic.
:balloon2:
My reasoning was to save my own neck. There is no conclusive evidence against anyone in this round, so its unfortunate that my comments were blown way out of proportion, and im now in a tie vote for the lynching. :no:Quote:
Originally Posted by Masy
The argument you put against me could be used against anyone, if worded differently. Nevermind.
Vote: Banquo's Ghost
Unvote:DW
Vote:Abstain
Screw that you guys can kill whoever you want.:whip:
Vote:Banquo's Ghost, his defense was suspicious and I don't see any logic at all in the case against divine wind...Masy seemed to accuse him mainly of joking around.
And you accused BG because of Wanax and because his defense is "suspicious" how so Sasaki?Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Quote:
Originally Posted by Masy
Not unique to Divine Wind. There were quite a few lurkers at the time this was posted. Also he has never been a big poster so this isn't suspicious for him.Quote:
2) He was last active at 12:11 today, and yet has not voted in this round. That's fine, on it's own, but compounded with his 'light' posting leads me to believe he is deliberately avoiding a vote (to stay under the radar, no doubt). Perhaps he's trying to mix in with the people who couldn't vote because of the thanksgiving.
Again, there are several people who haven't voted on a wagon:Quote:
3) He claims he wants the crowd gone, yet I believe he's the (pretending to be) neutral one. He votes, yes, but he doesn't want to appear a band wagoner (as mafia sometimes are), so he votes for someone who at that time was not in danger of a lynching. When people look back at folk's posting records, he'll stay under the radar, because he didn't bandwagon, yet nor did he miss many votes. I believe he's trying to be an 'average' player, one who doesn't
miss many votes (because I'm sure he's smart enough to know that inactivity would work against him), and one who doesn't draw attention to himself with the votes he casts. People who are talkative and confrontational (Sasaki, Csar etc) always find themselves under suspicion (as I surely will be soon), and I believe that is what he's trying to avoid.
Destroyer of Hope: 2 (Proletariat, Husar)
Craterus: 1 (Ignoramus)
Sasaki Kojiro: 1 (Sigurd Fafnesbane)
Proletariat: 1 (Silver Rusher)
Drisos: 1 (doc_bean)
So all we're left with is "he is trying to appear innocent" which isn't particularly suspect since townies don't want to appear guilty...it might be mafia behavior it might not.
His defense has been satisfactory to me. I'm not ruling him out but he doesn't seem very guilty and there isn't much of a case against him.
Patience my young apprentice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Csar