-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zack
There are so many contradictions within this one post.
Logic isn't my strong suit. Neither are words. Or making good arguments. I'm bad at everything.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Zack
There are so many contradictions within this one post.
Unlike most contradictions, this one might even be meaningful. Bam!
Like me, Csargo is overworked, except he's defending two contradictory positions at once.
Although some say I'm actually "overloaded".
Both Logic and Csargo have claimed to be inferior players. I don't believe that, I just think they're playing with the opposing pieces.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
Although some say I'm actually "overloaded".
This must be why I do better when I have a space advantage, if you know what I'm sayin'.
We'll have a pizza eating contest, who is going to win? Me.
I'm not making fun, he said this stuff.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Csargo
Logic isn't my strong suit. Neither are words. Or making good arguments. I'm bad at everything.
I think this post makes Csargo most likely to be town.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
This must be why I do better when I have a space advantage, if you know what I'm sayin'.
We'll have a pizza eating contest, who is going to win? Me.
I'm not making fun, he said this stuff.
Multiple interlocking defensive arrangements are effective when you haven't yet made contact with the enemy, so that when you do you can exploit more opportunities?
Who said what stuff?
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dp101
I think this post makes Csargo most likely to be town.
INCORRECT!
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Montmorency
Who said what stuff?
Your favorite grandmaster.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Csargo
Logic isn't my strong suit. Neither are words. Or making good arguments. I'm bad at everything.
My wife would very much you not claim me as a suit.
I am off to bed. This start has given me plenty to think on.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Logic
My wife would very much you not claim me as a suit.
I am off to bed. This start has given me plenty to think on.
You're at minus a whole rook at this point.
Terrible!
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
INCORRECT!
Ehhh, no. I'm not convinced that scum stages that kind of joking breakdown so early and easily, I can't really see Csargo actually deciding to make that kind of post as scum, rather than a more standard rebuttal or backing down.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dp101
Ehhh, no. I'm not convinced that scum stages that kind of joking breakdown so early and easily, I can't really see Csargo actually deciding to make that kind of post as scum, rather than a more standard rebuttal or backing down.
Dp posts his reasoning, Double Question Mark.
Like the confidence though, random and inappropriate as it may be.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
Dp posts his reasoning, Double Question Mark.
Like the confidence though, random and inappropriate as it may be.
...have I not historically posted my reasoning here? Cause I could have sworn that I get scumread here moderately often for trying to solve the game too fast, or at least, me posting analysis on D1 is definitely not unusual for me.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dp101
...have I not historically posted my reasoning here? Cause I could have sworn that I get scumread here moderately often for trying to solve the game too fast, or at least, me posting analysis on D1 is definitely not unusual for me.
Csargo town based on what you reasoned is a double question mark conclusion. Class dismissed!
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
Csargo town based on what you reasoned is a double question mark conclusion. Class dismissed!
分かった。
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
After a couple of opening blunders, black is in danger of either a lost rook or queen or both.
However, there hasn't been enough time to make even more mistakes. White still has several pieces to develop to fully capitalize.
Morphy would get all his pieces involved.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
I'm hoping for some pawn moves that allow for full piece development without opening too many weak squares in the position. If they stay in front of the pieces, there's a chance that black can still develop and get a checkmate in spite of the bad opening.
And when I said class dismissed I do kind have to log off. See you in the next video! Yes, you, in the audience! You can donate to my chess club, and remember, no donation is too large.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
After a couple of opening blunders, black is in danger of either a lost rook or queen or both.
However, there hasn't been enough time to make even more mistakes. White still has several pieces to develop to fully capitalize.
Morphy would get all his pieces involved.
I posted in another language, yet I think I was still more understandable than this. I think you are saying that you think you might have caught 2 scum, but haven't got town on board yet due to them not being obvious enough, but I have no idea what you mean by the last sentence.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
I'm hoping for some pawn moves that allow for full piece development without opening too many weak squares in the position. If they stay in front of the pieces, there's a chance that black can still develop and get a checkmate in spite of the bad opening.
And when I said class dismissed I do kind have to log off. See you in the next video! Yes, you, in the audience! You can donate to my chess club, and remember, no donation is too large.
Pizza translation attempt 2: He wants low posters to post more to allow people to read them, but hopes that they don't screw up and get mislynched. If they do nothing, then scum wins. At least this one was more straightforward.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
I'm bored someone else post for a bit.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
I did a quick re-analysis before log off, and this is the position:
White pieces:
1) Askthepizzaguy (King, obviously)
2) Zack (Queen, how scandalous. Sorry, Sooh. Needs to reposition, IYKWIM)
3) reinoe (Knight, solid development)
4) dp101 (pawn pushed too early leaving weaknesses for black's knight)
5) GH (pawn on a solid square)
Black pieces:
1) Logic (Queen, gonna get trapped, already in danger)
2) Csargo (Knight, albeit on a good square for his team)
The rest of you:
??????
Computer says I'm at plus 5. Also, Zack and GH both in my town, double exclam. Nice.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Well turns out the translation attempt wasn't necessary. Also not sure if I should feel insulted for being called a pawn or not.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Dp101
Well turns out the translation attempt wasn't necessary. Also not sure if I should feel insulted for being called a pawn or not.
Type of piece = day one confidence level, to be adjusted on subsequent days with cause.
Ok seriously, class dismissed. That's as much help as I can give you on this salary. What salary? Exactly.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
Type of piece = day one confidence level, to be adjusted on subsequent days with cause.
Ok seriously, class dismissed. That's as much help as I can give you on this salary. What salary? Exactly.
Ahhhhh, ok then.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Fine DP, that's pretty towny.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
Unlike most contradictions, this one might even be meaningful. Bam!
Like me, Csargo is overworked, except he's defending two contradictory positions at once.
Although some say I'm actually "overloaded".
Both Logic and Csargo have claimed to be inferior players. I don't believe that, I just think they're playing with the opposing pieces.
Am I? I was fully unaware of any such positions.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Askthepizzaguy
I did a quick re-analysis before log off, and this is the position:
White pieces:
1) Askthepizzaguy (King, obviously)
2) Zack (Queen, how scandalous. Sorry, Sooh. Needs to reposition, IYKWIM)
3) reinoe (Knight, solid development)
4) dp101 (pawn pushed too early leaving weaknesses for black's knight)
5) GH (pawn on a solid square)
Black pieces:
1) Logic (Queen, gonna get trapped, already in danger)
2) Csargo (Knight, albeit on a good square for his team)
The rest of you:
??????
Computer says I'm at plus 5. Also, Zack and GH both in my town, double exclam. Nice.
This is the only post I understand from pizza.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Csargo
This is the only post I understand from pizza.
Understandable.
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Csargo
This is the only post I understand from pizza.
INCORRECT!
And when these other students figure it out, you'll be down a knight as well. The truth hurts!
-
Re: Chess - Game Thread [In Play]
White's blindfolded, can't fake not knowing what's happening.
Black on the other hand, not blindfolded and the pretense at imperfect information is your largest blunder so far.
I calculated it out, and it doesn't look good for you. RAAAAAAWWWWWRRRRR!!!