It is indeed good of you to speak up, and I will certainly respond in a proper manner to your queries young Steffen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by OverKnight
Actually, our reputation has fallen from Dubious after the ambush to Untrustworthy during his term. Our Emperor began the Chancellor's term known as "the Chivalrous", at the end he is known as "the Killer". Kaiser Henry did not deserve this blackening of his name. A Saint of Battle and Grand Crusader known as such? It is a terrible shame.
I would ask you to ask any of the scribes assembled in this chamber and ask them what exactly I have said. I explicitly stated that our 'relations with other friendly christians' have improved, yes? What does this have to do with our reputation, or the name-calling?
Considering that I personally have released most prisoners that my forces have taken to boost our reputation, I believe many others have executed them, leading to a decrease in our overall reputation. That is outside of my control as you are well aware I hope.
As for the name-calling of our esteemed emperor, it is unfortunate that our enemies believe all actions to originate from him instead of from the empire as a whole. Everyone who knows our emperor well, knows that he is no mindless killer but a chivalrous example to all of christendom.
Quote:
The Chancellor claims to support the Houses fully, yet why does he ignore our Build Queues seemingly at will? This has happened to all the Duchies. He claims to know better than us, to cherry pick amongst the orders for those he likes and falls back on technicalities in the Charter when we complain.
I would like to believe that you have some respect for our charter. It clearly states that buildings are constructed if their orders are provided in a timely manner. Most of them have not, and as such, it is up to myself to decide which buildings will benefit the settlements the most.
This may be more or less a technicality, but if it is disregarded, what is next? All governors deciding what units to recruit in their towns and whether to aid nearby regions or not? Clearly our charter is in place to arrange for a smooth progression of a chancellor's term and not to slow our overall progress by bickering.
Quote:
The Chancellor had few edicts to fulfill in his term. It is doubtful that he has completely finished Edict 9.3, assistance to our Allies. Most of the Chancellor's energy seems to have been focused on his private war against Sofia and Hungary. Though independent action is within his rights, this was not called for by the Diet. While the BHA rescued Zagreb, while we fought for our lives outside Durazzo, while the Mongols were bearing down on us, the Chancellor pursued vengeance for a personal slight against him many years ago.
While I agree that the exact wording of the edict may not have been fulfilled, I believe that is spirit has been. Our aid to the Byzantine captial certain is not forgotten, yes?
Having stationed our own fleets near our allies' fleets also is support of their military and having Prince Jobst stand by the English to defend them against the Danes.
Considering that our enemies were to cowardly to attack us, this edict has been fulfilled as far as it can be.
Quote:
Does the Diet remember? The young Count Hans had to flee from a massive Hungarian Army during the First Crusade after he impetuosly decided to cross their territory with just his retainers. Is it any coincidence this humiliation took place near Sofia, the very Citadel he took and has the most advanced Army in the Reich operating from now?
If you believe that this was merely a personal vendetta, then I question your state of mind. Surely you ought to visit the graves around Zagreb and find out where those menaces originated from? Or ask our dead breathren who slaughtered them? Most of these barbarians came from Sofia and our borders are much more secure with it in our hands. Do you wish me to gif it back to the Magyars to prove my point?
Quote:
Do you mean the few Militia units under the command of Lothar in Italy? Or the four units of professional soldiers under my command near Innsbruck? Or the three and a half units of professional soldiers in Innsbruck besides a unit of peasants? The BHA, through bribery and adventures into Austria, has melted away and has yet to be fully replaced. I am grateful for the destruction of the Milanese invasion fleet, but the situation is hardly as postive as the Chancellor describes. The Swabian HA is in the same boat, as it is divided and understrength.
Have you ever been chancellor yourself, young man? I thought not.
If you had ever read my recent reports to the diet, you will have noticed that this force was assembled to aid a swift lighting conquest of the islands as the BHA is still being rebuilt and an offer was made to your Duke to accept said force for invasion or wait for the BHA to regain full strength. Any army in retraining is obviously split in several smaller forces to move as quickly as possible to their training centers, especially if those are far from the front.
Also, blaming me for the regiments deserting is proposterous.
Quote:
My lords, what does the Reich stand for? In 1080, it was for restoration of the Empire, taking back the lands that had rebelled. Then, restoration of our standing within the Church and the expansion of our influence with the Pope. After that, it was the completion of the Crusade and the establishment of a bulwark against the infidels named Outremer. Now what our are goals? What is the overarching aspiration of the Reich?
Defense and security I have heard mentioned in the Diet. I have said the same words myself. Yet, what should be our larger goals? How do we accomplish security? Where should our borders be? Should we endeavor to restore our fallen reputation? Should we attempt peace with some of our enemies? Or is that all cast aside in the name of conquest?
Our goals are clear. To fortify our borders and retaliate against those who attack us, without waging an all out war against them that would be too costly for the empire as a whole. To defend christendom and Jerusalem from hostile take-overs, and to convert the heathens to the true faith. Standing by our allies to aid them in their struggles is certainly also worthwhile.
Lastly, and most importantly, our goal is to be the dominant policing force of the mainland of Europe and act as a guardian of law, order and faith.
It is not that I have not tried gaining peace with those nations we are at war with, but all efforts were quickly rebuffed by them, leaving currently no other choice as to either wage a defensive or a partial offensive war.