I installed it LK but noticed nothing differant whats new http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/confused.gif
Or is it an insurance scam http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/rolleyes.gif
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/argue.gif
Printable View
I installed it LK but noticed nothing differant whats new http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/confused.gif
Or is it an insurance scam http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/rolleyes.gif
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/argue.gif
Lk, will this version work for VI?
Just need to know before I download it, as my CD for MTW is still being lent to a friend.
Cheers. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wave.gif
Hmmmm, not exactly Storm. None of us have played enough to get to know everything thoroughly.
TS/RFG|S
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wave.gif Hello friends
Giving myself 2 weeks prior to my holiday to finish adding
all units necessary into bif's Austerlic and Waterloo gona be working on generic principal. We are sqizing nicly 2 Inf units on 1 bif and 6 Cav units on 1 bif too, Reason due to size of download. Back to work now http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ons/smokin.gif
No I just finished that now.Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
I'll post it as soon as I test it. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/smile.gif
apart from the Ten New Units the Howitzer and TwleveQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
Pounder and a couple of tweeks , nothing new really.
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/rolleyes.gif
Let's face it who would insure me. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ns/biggrin.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
If that's what your talking aboutQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
well I changed some graphic errors in the prod11.
Yes graphic errors in the prod11.
The scale was wrong on one unit
and the wrong bif was tagged for another.
The idea was that you would install it before
you noticed. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ns/biggrin.gif
LK http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ons/smokin.gif
Btw the thread has a lot of non relevent posts.
They will be removed soon .
I'm not complaining I'm just telling you how it is. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ns/biggrin.gif
LK http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ons/smokin.gif
very nice job i must say, however i am unsure of how to install the fix. Can you give an idiots version on installing it. Just in case i got it wrong. Thanks and good work.
Hello Guys,
I'm back from vacation - spent two nice weeks of diving in Croatia and can't wait to go on with some new portraits. I'll try to have one more package ready for the weekend.
BTW - did you notice about the custom avatars (sticky on top of the dungeon post list)? Tried it already and looks quite nice.
greetings
Hal
Well Krazy i didnt notice them.... So there we are. Although Stormer and I had problems with the fix. Probably his fault ( http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/joker.gif ), but we get the same old network mismatch. You might wanna run a few tests to prove me wrong and at the same time play me http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/smile.gif
TS/RFG|S
The fix is just aQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
prod11.txt and projectile stats .txt
put the files in the root directory of the MTW folder
that has the 1.8 version of the nap mod in it.
If you both have downloaded and installed the fixQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
Then I can't understand how that could happen http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...s/confused.gif
I will in a couple of weeks but I'm busyQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
getting the new bifs togeather with LBA
at the moment , in between pretending to edit the
prod11.
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/joker.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/joker.gif
Hi Hal http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wave.gif
now back to work.
http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/joker.gif
LK http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ons/smokin.gif
LK, hei
Leave the PROD11 to me. I am fixing it. I am sure that you have enough on your plate.
BTW, to do the uber Waterloo campaign, we still need the following units:
*French Empress' Own Dragoons (Imperial Guard Heavy Cav regiment, always brigaded with the Horse Grenadiers)
*French Lanciers de la Garde (the famous Imperial Guard Red Lancers regiment, always brigaded with the Chasseurs a Cheval de la Garde)
*French Line Lancers
*French Gendarmes d' Elite ( French Mounted Military Police, Guard status, very similar in shape, size, uniform and experience to the Horse Grenadiers, more than capable of charging boot to boot with the heavies in a pinch)
*Dutch-Belgian line infantry
*Dutch-Belgian light infantry
*Nassau line infantry
I will go through my Waterloo OOB to check if I left out some units.
Regards,
Cuirassier http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/smile.gif http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/smile.gif
A new development in the Nap Mod. I have been able to add the Formation "Square" to the AI's formations file, and by increasing the priority quotient the AI is choosing it exclusively for defensive formation. I am in the process of tweaking some of the settings to change the units that comprise the Square. Thanks to GilJaySmith who graciously provided CA's formation Data without which this would not have been possible. Some problems still need to be addressed, in the face of a Cav charge the AI will break ranks so the Square seems useless? I was able to add the command HoldTheLine which only helps the AI to reform into square after the initial charge not literally Hold The Line so it is a mixed blessing ,the AI will now have Square in its defensive repetoir but some things still need to be ironed out. LOS
This is very good news.Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
I was despairing that Square formation would be a complete impossibility
Well done LOS for making this big step in the right direction http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wave.gif
I am not sure if the Brunswikers are available in 1.8 cos i don't have it yet, but if they are not then they will be essential for the Waterloo campaign.Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
To represent this brigade at the very least these units would be needed (off the top of my head):
Avante Guard
Deaths Head Hussars
Lancers
Line Infantry
Light Infantry
Also are French Carabiniers available yet, as they would be needed?
Marines of the Imperial Guard?
Polish lancers?
There is a Brunswick cavalry troop in 1.8.
yea we need some more britih foot troops.
Well, not actual British foot troops, as the current units are quite sufficient for that (perhaps a light infantry unit if 1.8 does not already offer that).Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
What would be usefuel to add would be allied Infantry units, such as Spanish and portugese in British service.
Also if the KGL have not yet been done, they should at the very least recieve a rifle armed light unit.
I suppose a unit of Foot guards would be nice as well.
Not happy with the Square alone I have now added the Defensive formation "The Block" to the AI's repetoir of Defensive formations, I was not pleased with the rudimentary square formed by the AI it is more a 3 sided Rectangle, dont get me wrong I am happy that the AI can now use the Square I just want to add as much dimension to the Battle as possible ."The Block" is just that a solid square with the Royal unit protected in the background. In 1 of my test battles the AI formed up in the Block I sent 4 Cav units over the hill to engage on 3 sides to see what the AI would do, after the initial engagement I withdrew my Cav to lure the AI over the hill to my waiting Infantry, When the AI saw my infantry it immediatley went back to its defensive Block formation embedding the Royal unit to the rear. The gun battle ensued we exchanged fire until slowly each unit got whittled down to nothing, but lo and behold the Royal unit was protected to the last and still intact. So I think this formation although not conventinal might serve some purpose in our campaign. The tweaking continues.
Ive tested it, doesnt look very professional lol, but it does the job. Well done (I think).
TS/RFG|S
Suggestion chaps and something I was thinking of implementing in Jacobite TW. Convert the Camels into gray horses, and convert the Camel riders or whatever elite camel unit there is (dont play Egyptian very often!http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wink.gif into the Scots Greys. The look will be right but the horses will be 'fiercer'
Just a thought,
Lord de Clare
Click on the Link to see 3 screnshots of the New Formations Square and Block. I apologize for the pic quality, but look to the left hand corner mini map to get the idea of how the AI formed up. Thanks LOS Link For Screenshots
The middle picture is what the AI did with me. But the units individually came out and tried to attack my horses http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/mecry.gif And they died horribly.
TS
Come on lads, try and keep it relevant....Lords, as far as the unit descriptions go, which ones are still undone? Since ive done the Intro and chronology, i may turn my hand to a few of those. Let me know which ones are still available to do. I would have sent this by email, but its playing up (again).
I remain, my Lords, your humble servant
Lord Uxbridge
Unit descriptions for each units would be great.
Sadly the AI has so to speak a mind of its own, By inputting the data for the AI to form square and block does not mean the AI will be invincible it is just meant for variety. Like I stated earlier in the face of a cav charge any formation will break ranks unless told to hold and still even then. The data I used for the formations is just that we can not control evry aspect of the AI reactions, what I have noticed if given time the AI will try to reform the square or block when you withdraw and regroup.By changing the priority quotient you can get more of a variety. LOSQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
All of them need to be done . http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ns/biggrin.gifQuote:
Originally Posted by [b
I'll put you in touch with the person that
has agreed to do this . You can work togeather
on this . I would like them to be done by more than one
person anyway . http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/smile.gif
I'll pm you later.
Thanks
LK http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ons/smokin.gif
LK i was wondering if you could make all units 200 men not 120 max http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/frown.gif too ge tthe real feel we need 200.
also i see you have made horses have a chance against men now great http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...ns/biggrin.gif
and the mens fireing is slightly lowerd this is ok i guess.
but men dont shoot aspowerfull now but least they stand longer and battle goes on longer, well unless you get ux bridge charge you in his "coloums" formation which he claims to work, im yet to be stunned http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wink.gif
anyway good job LK this mod is sooooo good you got me playing MTW again even if it is the mod Thansk so much http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...icons/wave.gif
Good idea Stormer. Although perhaps for certain 'elite' units like the Greenjackets this could be lower. If we are taking 200men = a batalion, the Greenjackets should have much less as they tended to operate as companies being assigned individualy to army divisions and brigades.Quote:
Originally Posted by [b
Oh, and Lk, when will the VI cersion be ready?????
I am getting desperate now. http://www.totalwar.org/forum/non-cg...cons/shock.gif
yeah niceone about greenjackets derfel.
200 of them, would be like the whole of hell fighting you.