AW: Re: AW: Re: Babe thread
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Lemur
What do you think, Centurio? As I said in another thread, I'm not interested in making a long list of rules, since that way madness lies. Besides which, once you have a big, thick layer of rules, some clever cretin will always find the thing you missed. "Oh, you didn't say we couldn't post underage girls in clown make-up, so that's okay." Etc.
For the purpose of clarification, though: When I said "swimsuit area skin" I meant your average bikini, not a wicked weasel see-thru special. Which of course you already knew, but were asking as if you didn't.
This thread is PG. Treat it as such, and we'll get along fine.
Well, thank you for the clarification. I just wanted to avoid problems, since this great thread (the greatest thread ever made by man I might say) suffered a bit in the last time. I understand that the rules of the Babe Thread are somewhat case-law.
Though I must say that the removal of the one particular Kelly Brook picture was a bit shocking, since I found that to be totally according to what you call PG-13. And it excludes some really nice photos I found but thought totally harmless. :no:
Please understand that in different countries there are different perceptions of what you can show to someone below 13 and what not. I accept it though that you apply the particular American perception of nudity. Just yesterday I watched The Bounty which is rated "PG" - and honestly, in no movie I have ever seen such an extensive collection of perfectly shaped Tahitian breasts.