Vote: Sarathos
I still don't trust u
Printable View
Vote: Sarathos
I still don't trust u
Okay, this isn't an official talley. I can't believe I bothered to do this but I also didn't think I would get this far. In case of my demise here is another high tech graphic.
A lot of post say a vote or give clarification and a few were interesting when being looked at in the present.
There are some with very view that could raise FoS too. However, from what I have reviewed I think I could FoS mafia members and possible the serial killer and not by lowest post.
It's only one vote. mmmmm let me think here??:inquisitive:
Omanes 11
Stig 17
GH 18
Sasaki 5
KingWarman 1
Warmaster Horus 4
FactionHeir 20
Brave Sir Robin 9
woad&fangs 10
TwilightBlade 10
Sarathos 19 DID NOT POST TILL AFTER NIGHT 2
Husar 12
gibsonsg91921 5
CountArach 7
Xdeathfire 7
sapi 6
Tran 2
Northnovas 6
Xiahou 5
Hepcat 15
The Amazing Me 1
Dutch_guy 2
Jubal Barca 6
Haudegen 3
looking at the posting tally(thanks Nov) my initial impression is that Sarathos has a lot more posts than usual and Sasaki has a lot less. All the other people I have played with seem at about their usual level of participation.
vote: Sarathos
You know, when you're in the Gameroom you can just click the postcount number next to the thread to get exactly the statistic you just made, ordered by highest postcount.Quote:
Originally Posted by Northnovas
That is so cool I learn something everyday. The secrets of the ORG. Thanks,Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Vote: Sarathos
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Husar
Could've saved you a bit of time, eh Nov?
But nice idea and good work Northnovas!
As a dead mercenary wanting revenge for getting killed in the most gross way possible.. I shall continue supporting the towns eventhough im dead (Got nothing better to do)
If you keep killing active members youll find your self in big trouble. Reason of Sarathos having lots and lots of post are because he posted lots of short posts. This is getting too much attention and thus un mafia like behavior from me. I believe mafia was active on the first half and suddenly started to quiet down. So for the sake of game play I suggest leaving the member with lots of posts alone for now. Lynch the people who have posted for 5- 15 posts. The rest of the members under 5 posts can be left for WoG kill.
I would say the mafia are most likely not very experienced for killing the lurker (Zorg) and suicidal idiot (Beefy):clown: .
Theory one is the mafia has something against me and Zorg. Meaning Sarathos or Twilightblade is the mafia. But that is not likely
Theory two is mafia is new comer and killing people randomly.
Theory three is that mafia is highly experienced and if thats the case s/he is too good for my analysis.
Serial killer are probebly active member but he can be left for now because s/he has a possibility of killing the mafia which will save the townie one voting oppotunity.
I dont think Sarathos got any exams today so he can show up and defend him self. and i bet 5 bucks that what i said will be either ignored or half of it is not understandable/not useful.
Hire the real Holmes/ Kommodus. His analysis is far better then the wannabe Holmes/ Beefy:smash:
Oh, real nice way to go.
:help:
It would have saved me some time!! Why would those 2 not be mafia? There was something in the exchange of post that made me suspicious and Sarathos did post after the 2nd night.Quote:
Originally Posted by Beefy187
... seems like I've been ignored this entire time, and the only person who's said anything to me is Andres, when I asked him some questions.
Am I invisible? Or am I just the noob that nobody cares for?
My vote for sarathos still stands but we should avoid lynching active players unless we are confident of their guilt. The mafia has already won to many games by getting rid of active members early and then just barely avoiding the WoG.
Very tempted to bandwagon on Sarathos atm.
But, when looking at post count, Tran seems a bit too inactive given his usualy style of playing so
Vote:Tran
Just to remind you guys, don't listen to those who say let teh lurkers get Woged, becuase in a lot of mafia games, when I was mafia, I usually lurk and no one votes for me, and then I slowly get rid of everyone and win, look at farmtown, me and Tran lurked and won.
True that.. Then Sasaki will get suspecious.
Andres when is the lurkers getting WoGged? How many more nights do they have?
Actually, I ran the post count thing as Husar suggested and found that everyone still alive seems to have posted at least twice in this topic, i.e. 1 for sign up, 1 during game (assumedly), so there won't be any WoGs sadly...
That said, it could be a Mafia lurker among them.
Still, I still suspect CA, so vote: CA
No response once again?Quote:
Originally Posted by Zain
Wind must be funny today. Thought I hear voices or so. *shrug* :wink:
Hi Zain! :laugh4:
Who do you think the mafia is?
I'm sure it's CountArach, I don't trust him one bit. The only other person I have suspicions about is Sarathos, but I think CountArach is more likely. I think maybe he hasn't killed me because if he did it would look suspicious if the person who said he was Mafia died.
But I see through your tricks. :inquisitive:
Vote: CountArach
It's because I'm Australian you filthy sheep shagger :wink:
FactionHeir, can you point me to the post where you summed up your suspisions of me?
As to Sarathos being guilty, I am not so sure. The kills so far seem to be those who he associates with in real life, and I highly doubt he would kill them for that reason. However, it wcould be argued we could invoke WIFOM and indeed that is why he is killing them. I would like to hear something from Sarathos.
Gibsong has been tweaking my suspicion a bit. Look at his last post for example:
A pure and blatant bandwagon. So I shall Vote: GibsongQuote:
Vote: Sarathos
I still don't trust u
Vote: Sarathos
You still haven't replied to this. Neither has woad&fangs, but his comment could have simply been a mistake. Sarathos currently has no excuse for his peculiar and abnormal behaviour.
Guys settle down, the reason i didnt post till night two is that its exam week at school. I was strangly enough studing fo these and did know that game had started, I posted after night two so i didnt get WOGEd. And Stig if you think im too active i will lurk again if you want, i always get lynched for being inactive/lurking and now i am active and trying to help and im still suspious and prob going to be lynched...wtf guys :inquisitive:
Same thing applies to you Omanes
So being active and trying to help the town is abnormal...?????Quote:
Originally Posted by Omanes Alexandrapolites
And what do you want me to answer??? The only reason im posting alot is to help everyone and try not to look suspious by not posting and considered be a lurker, I really could care about my post count or number of posts in a thread.
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
I knew that comment was coming sooner or later. ~D
But the truth is that I still don't trust you. The first time I voted for you was because you are an Aussie, the other times are because I think you're an evil Mafioso.
:inquisitive:
Vote: Omanes
Sarathos isnt being unusuall, he lurks spams and then lurks again its what he does
Sarathos has been getting way too much attention. Sarathos isnt complete dumb ass like me. Im sure he would be more cautious and play in role (Lurk like always). If the game doesnt finish in the next 2 or 3 rounds then go for it. But unless you got no one better to vote for, Sarathos should be left alone. Right now there are some good lynch option available like CA and Tran.
Ask away CAQuote:
Originally Posted by CountArach
That is not how I remember playing with him - he used to be a rather quiet player who most certainly didn't repetitively post like he is doing at current.Quote:
Originally Posted by Twilightblade
My vote still stands - it's clear that he still has post editing abilities, so the only excuse he could possibly provide to appease me cannot be used. He also contradicts himself here.
On a different note, why are you so eager to defend Sarathos twilightblade? Do you honestly trust in his innocence, or is the reason a little more sinister?
Reminds you of the chat in some way, doesn't it? :laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Proletariat
Vote: Sarathos
Well, two reasons:
1. he might be guilty because some of you say so
2. if he is innocent, we can finally stop talking about him and concentrate on someone else
for now he looks like the best choice because discussion is focused around him.
Vote: Sarathos
- We're focusing too much on him, as Husar pointed out.
- I buy much of Omanes' case
- Double posting irritates me ~:)