Printable View
Hitler wasn't interested in administration. He left all that to the various ministries and gave his backing to the most radical bill. It's not really worthwhile trying to apply political terms to him. He was just a militaristic nationalist. He wanted an empire of the master race. The general ruling between 1933-1945 was chaotic and that's why policies fluctuated so much. Hitler was indecisive, lazy and uninterested with general administration.Quote:
Originally Posted by Caledonian Rhyfelwyr
Oh please, discussion is such a liberal fetish. :juggle2:Quote:
Originally Posted by Caledonian Rhyfelwyr
Actually, following those definitions (that shows how limited they actually are), more of a radical reactionary (the third reich, aryans, purifying the blood, all to return to an imaginary golden age), with some progressive moves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasaki Kojiro
Lemur, are you continuing on the joke or are you going to argue that DDR (Deutsche Demokratische Republik) was democratic next?
:laugh4:Quote:
Originally Posted by Ironside
I was joking when I said Hitler was a socialist. Its just when the topic of Hitler being conservative came up, it reminder me of an exam question at my Uni asking if Hitler was a socialist, which seems ridiculous IMO.
:laugh4: :laugh4: Where's Frag when you need him?Quote:
Originally Posted by HoreTore
Well, looks as though the time for serious replies is over, and it's all-Hitler-all-the-time from now on. Could some kindly mod please lock this thread?
Hitler.
Spoiler Alert, click show to read:
Sorry, Kukri's asleep. So you'll have to put up with me instead.Quote:
Originally Posted by Lemur
Thank you all for contributions.
:closed: