Why do you think that? Didn't Iraq just ask for 400 billion from us to get on it's feet after 5 years?
Printable View
I blame Clinton. Because of the allowing of out sourcing on such a large scale, in turn lowering the amount of jobs for the american populace. Thus increasing un employment, thus making it so our consumer prices would go down but less people could afford to buy things, then giving us a false idea that we were actually making a better economy when all we were doing was filling up a balloon which in the end popped. Then as it popped Bush decided to goto war for too long. Thus turning us into a declining economy.
Now if you disagree that one country can cause a total global recession look at it this way
America buys the resources -> Ships to cheap labor countries or gets labor from other countries(such as central valley california) -> reships it back and sells it -> american economy shows signs of increase in profits -> other countries purchase stock in american based economies -> American based economy crashes -> PRICES GO UP!!^^^^^ -> People can't afford as much as they normally would -> other countries lost money on certain American based companies -> watch as the world bleeds to death
DOCTOR DOCTOR QUICK THE ONLY WAY TO FIX THE PROBLEM IS TO POOR MORE AND MORE BLOOD INTO THE GAPING WOUND!!!
:help: (I DONT KNOW WHAT IM SAYING!!)
In CommieAmerica, BUSH BLAMES YOU.
Yes, it's right.
He had the powers to prevent it, and as such he can't hide from the responsibility. He is responsibe simply because he was president at the time of the crisis. He didn't see it coming, and is to blame.
well, considering things didnt cost nearly as much then as it does now.....
who knows? if everything was the same price, maybe WWII would have cost us many billions more than the iraq war.
but i think the key is to not annouce our planned withdrawl until it already happened. then the terroist cant just sit tight until we pull out then go in full force.