Dion may be going sooner than expected.
Printable View
Prime ministers are technicly not elected, but in parliamentary systems its convention (sometimes expicitly required) that the leader of the largest faction in parliament gets the position.
In the Netherlands, where coalitions are the norm and minority governments rare, there's been only one instance of the largest party ending in opposition.
Oh yeah, party subsidies = bad.
But political party leaders are elected. By the party membership rather than the electorate. And in theory the PM is elected by the parliment. The parties just so happen to vote for their leader.
And Canada follows the British tradtion on deputy PM's (a near pointless honourific). We haven't had one since Harper took office.
Yeah. The last federal Liberal leadership convention was televised live. They are big political shows here. All card holding members of the party vote for their new leader in 2 or 3 rounds of voting. Although as leader Dion could step down today and appoint an interim leader from the hopefulls for leadership until the convention in May.
Here it's just a title given to a cabinet minister. Who can then lead cabinet meetings if the PM is out of the country. I read up on yours and it's an actual cabinet post.
Our public funding scheme isn't as bad as it's been made out to be. Your party gets a few dollars for every vote you get. And there is a minimum % thresshold of the popular vote you to get too to qualify. 2% or 3% I think. While it does benefit the large parties more than the smaller ones, obviously. Since it's been implemented the NDP and Greens have been able to get their message out better and have done pregressively better in elections. I think it's a good system.
In Canada, big businesses and unions aren't allowed to...and so on.
By the by, he's gone.
I would rather my governments were not slaves to big business.
seconded!
political donations are nothing more than bribery imo, the most capable of this bribery are the very rich, this leaves politicians responsible for voters and political donators, if campaigns are publically financied then they only have one master, the public as it should be.... not that i want huge amounts spent on campaigning anyway
Honestoly we shouold have olearned oour olesson forom cash for honoours scandal, it was obvious to me as a teenager that poolitical donations is a logically flawed system and i cannot for the life of me understand people who support it....
Problem with you "o" key LG? :wink:
Edit: I shouldn't pick a fight just to pick one
Edit 2: NO FIGHTS